RE: Relative vs. absolute links

2013-02-28 Thread Wim Hooghwinkel - idtp
Hi Peggy,

it's your workflow that creates the confusion in references.

You say: ''3) I opened all of the files in FM 9, therefore converting them to 
FM 9 format. I did my cleanup, including fixing the graphics path to the 
Graphics subfolder and fixing cross-reference links that were broken. In 
retrospect I believe cross-references within the same file were okay but 
cross-references between files were all broken.''

If you open the files individually in FM9, it can't resolve cross refs because 
these are in FM7 files. If you didn't change names (didn't you …?) best 
approach is to use a book file for all the docs, open the book in FM9, open all 
files in the book accepting all errors and then save al files in the book, 
next: update all references. Now at least the cross refs should be resolved.

Then you say: ''4) When I finished my work I saved each individual file and the 
book file in MIF 7.0 format. I saved the MIF files in a different folder than 
the FM 9 files and copied the Graphics directory to the same folder as the 
MIF files.'' 

If you save a file in a different folder, all references will still point to 
the original locations. So saving the FM9 files in a FM7 folder will not let 
them point to the graphics folder in the FM7 folder.  So you should first save, 
then move.

Your paths are not 'changing to absolute' but are still relative, although 
pointing to the wrong folder. (note that when you read a MIF file all paths are 
written as absolute paths).

You better use a book mover utility….



Vriendelijke groet / Kind regards,
 
Wim Hooghwinkel

Information Energy 2013 – Leading Conference on Innovation in Knowledge and 
Information Exchange
IEn2013
 
tel. +31652036811
Skype wimhooghwinkel
Twitter @idtp @NLDITA @ien2013
i...@idtp.eu 
www.idtp.eu
 
FrameMaker support: framema...@idtp.eu 

___


You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com.

Send list messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com.

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.


RE: Relative vs. absolute links

2013-02-28 Thread Harvey, Peggy
Hi Rick,

Thank you for the information, it sounds like an interesting tool. In my case 
no folders or files have been renamed so that isn’t the problem.

Like Alison, I’d like to know *why* FrameMaker seems to be changing relative 
references to absolute ones when I’ve followed the rules and kept all files in 
the same directory with graphics neatly organized in a single subdirectory. My 
understanding of FrameMaker was that maintaining relative references was one of 
the program’s claims to fame; now it seems that “feature” is a lot more fragile 
than I thought.

Thanks,

Peggy

From: Rick Quatro [mailto:r...@rickquatro.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 2:15 PM
To: 'Alison Craig'; 'Paul Wilbraham'; Harvey, Peggy
Subject: RE: Relative vs. absolute links

Hi Alison and Peggy,

Please forgive me if I have sent you this link before. Please let me know if 
you have any questions or comments. Thank you very much.

http://frameautomation.com/2010/02/23/managing-imported-images-solution/

Rick

Rick Quatro
Carmen Publishing Inc.
585-283-5045
r...@frameexpert.commailto:r...@frameexpert.com



From: 
framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.commailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
 [mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Alison Craig
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 2:06 PM
To: Paul Wilbraham; 'framers@lists.frameusers.com'; Harvey, Peggy
Subject: RE: Relative vs. absolute links

I would agree, as when I send the files out – all on the same drive – 
everything works fine with relative paths.

But when they come back – still all on the same drive – they are returned with 
absolute paths.

That’s my dilemma. The relative positions of the files don’t change – but the 
paths become absolute anyway.

Note that while my version control database is on a network drive, all files 
are checked out to a local drive when they are being worked on, so there is no 
network issue, at least on my end.

Alison

From: Paul Wilbraham [mailto:paul.wilbra...@m-ais.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:30 AM
To: Alison Craig; 'framers@lists.frameusers.com'; Harvey, Peggy
Subject: RE: Relative vs. absolute links

Alison
We find that graphics on the same drive as the original files are relative. 
Graphics on a separate drive are absolute.

--Paul
On 27 February 2013 at 18:09 Alison Craig 
alison.cr...@ultrasonix.commailto:alison.cr...@ultrasonix.com wrote:
I’d love to hear an explanation as I often have the same relative/absolute 
issue with graphics and xrefs when my files are returned from the translators.

Although in my case, everything is done in FM 9 or with the MIF 9 format – so 
my issue has nothing to do with Frame versioning.

Alison

PS: All FM files used to create the Book are in a single folder with graphics 
in a series of subfolders.

From: 
framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.commailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
 [mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Harvey, Peggy
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 7:41 AM
To: 'framers@lists.frameusers.com'
Subject: Relative vs. absolute links

Hi Framers,

FM 9 p 237 and FM 7 p576

Situation: Converting files between FM 7 and FM 9. All links and file 
references are relative when I start but appear to become absolute when I 
convert either way.

I need to share files with a coworker at another site. I have FM 9 and he has 
FM 7. The files, including the book file, are always all in a single directory 
with a “Graphics” subdirectory for all graphics.

Here’s the sequence of events:

1) The files were originally in FM 7. (When I inherited them, at least.) I put 
them on a network drive in that form, without converting them to FM 9.
2) My coworker edited the files, then put them back on the network drive so I 
could do some clean up work on them. I moved them to a different network drive 
to do the work.
3) I opened all of the files in FM 9, therefore converting them to FM 9 format. 
I did my cleanup, including fixing the graphics path to the “Graphics” 
subfolder and fixing cross-reference links that were broken. In retrospect I 
believe cross-references within the same file were okay but cross-references 
between files were all broken.
4) When I finished my work I saved each individual file and the book file in 
MIF 7.0 format. I saved the MIF files in a different folder than the FM 9 files 
and copied the “Graphics” directory to the same folder as the MIF files.
5) I opened each MIF file and the MIF book file in FM 7, then saved each one in 
.fm (or .book) format.
6) I noticed that the book file seemed to be referring to the the previous 
files – the FM 9 files with the same names in the different folder. I deleted 
all of the file references and added all of the FM 7 files that I’d just 
created. So the FM 7 book file and individual files were all in the same folder.
6) When I went to generate the book I got an error log that all of the 
cross-references I’d fixed in FM 9 were unresolved again. Upon further 
inspection I

RE: Relative vs. absolute links

2013-02-28 Thread Harvey, Peggy
Hi Wim,

Thanks for your input. When I opened each file individually I did do it from 
the book file, saved each file, and updated the book (including references) - 
for both the FM 9 and FM 7 files the xrefs were still unresolved.

I'll have to try saving first, then moving, maybe that will do the trick. 
Thought I'd save time by doing both in one step but apparently not.

Thanks,

Peggy


From: Wim Hooghwinkel - idtp [mailto:w...@idtp.eu]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 2:24 PM
To: Harvey, Peggy
Cc: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Relative vs. absolute links

Hi Peggy,

it's your workflow that creates the confusion in references.

You say: ''3) I opened all of the files in FM 9, therefore converting them to 
FM 9 format. I did my cleanup, including fixing the graphics path to the 
Graphics subfolder and fixing cross-reference links that were broken. In 
retrospect I believe cross-references within the same file were okay but 
cross-references between files were all broken.''

If you open the files individually in FM9, it can't resolve cross refs because 
these are in FM7 files. If you didn't change names (didn't you ...?) best 
approach is to use a book file for all the docs, open the book in FM9, open all 
files in the book accepting all errors and then save al files in the book, 
next: update all references. Now at least the cross refs should be resolved.

Then you say: ''4) When I finished my work I saved each individual file and the 
book file in MIF 7.0 format. I saved the MIF files in a different folder than 
the FM 9 files and copied the Graphics directory to the same folder as the 
MIF files.''

If you save a file in a different folder, all references will still point to 
the original locations. So saving the FM9 files in a FM7 folder will not let 
them point to the graphics folder in the FM7 folder.  So you should first save, 
then move.

Your paths are not 'changing to absolute' but are still relative, although 
pointing to the wrong folder. (note that when you read a MIF file all paths are 
written as absolute paths).

You better use a book mover utility


Vriendelijke groet / Kind regards,

Wim Hooghwinkel

Information Energy 2013 - Leading Conference on Innovation in Knowledge and 
Information Exchange
IEn2013http://informationenergy.org/

tel. +31652036811
Skype wimhooghwinkel
Twitter @idtp @NLDITA @ien2013
i...@idtp.eumailto:i...@idtp.eu
www.idtp.euhttp://www.idtp.eu

FrameMaker support: framema...@idtp.eumailto:framema...@idtp.eu

___


You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com.

Send list messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com.

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.


RE: Relative vs. absolute links

2013-02-27 Thread Alison Craig
I'd love to hear an explanation as I often have the same relative/absolute 
issue with graphics and xrefs when my files are returned from the translators.

Although in my case, everything is done in FM 9 or with the MIF 9 format - so 
my issue has nothing to do with Frame versioning.

Alison

PS: All FM files used to create the Book are in a single folder with graphics 
in a series of subfolders.

From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com 
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Harvey, Peggy
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 7:41 AM
To: 'framers@lists.frameusers.com'
Subject: Relative vs. absolute links

Hi Framers,

FM 9 p 237 and FM 7 p576

Situation: Converting files between FM 7 and FM 9. All links and file 
references are relative when I start but appear to become absolute when I 
convert either way.

I need to share files with a coworker at another site. I have FM 9 and he has 
FM 7. The files, including the book file, are always all in a single directory 
with a Graphics subdirectory for all graphics.

Here's the sequence of events:

1) The files were originally in FM 7. (When I inherited them, at least.) I put 
them on a network drive in that form, without converting them to FM 9.
2) My coworker edited the files, then put them back on the network drive so I 
could do some clean up work on them. I moved them to a different network drive 
to do the work.
3) I opened all of the files in FM 9, therefore converting them to FM 9 format. 
I did my cleanup, including fixing the graphics path to the Graphics 
subfolder and fixing cross-reference links that were broken. In retrospect I 
believe cross-references within the same file were okay but cross-references 
between files were all broken.
4) When I finished my work I saved each individual file and the book file in 
MIF 7.0 format. I saved the MIF files in a different folder than the FM 9 files 
and copied the Graphics directory to the same folder as the MIF files.
5) I opened each MIF file and the MIF book file in FM 7, then saved each one in 
.fm (or .book) format.
6) I noticed that the book file seemed to be referring to the the previous 
files - the FM 9 files with the same names in the different folder. I deleted 
all of the file references and added all of the FM 7 files that I'd just 
created. So the FM 7 book file and individual files were all in the same folder.
6) When I went to generate the book I got an error log that all of the 
cross-references I'd fixed in FM 9 were unresolved again. Upon further 
inspection I discovered all of the graphics had the wrong path, too - they were 
linked absolutely to the Graphics folder in my FM 9 folder, not to the 
relative Graphics folder I'd copied to the FM 7 folder.

My question: Why are the links and references to files (graphics and 
cross-references) changing from relative to absolute paths when I convert from 
one version to another? At least that's what seems to be happening, either when 
I open FM 7 files directly in FM 9 or when I go through the MIF to convert from 
FM 9 back to FM 7. Anyone have any insight to this?

FYI: Our final solution is we're STRONGLY recommending my coworker upgrade to 
FM 9 as soon as possible. I'm hoping he'll be able to even though Adobe is on 
FM 11 now. I've seen the traffic on the list about FM 11; I have no desire to 
update to it at this time so I'm hoping he doesn't have to, either.

Thanks,

Peggy
___


You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com.

Send list messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com.

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.


RE: Relative vs. absolute links

2013-02-27 Thread Paul Wilbraham
Alison
We find that graphics on the same drive as the original files are relative.
Graphics on a separate drive are absolute.

--Paul

 On 27 February 2013 at 18:09 Alison Craig alison.cr...@ultrasonix.com wrote:
 
 
  I’d love to hear an explanation as I often have the same relative/absolute
 issue with graphics and xrefs when my files are returned from the translators.
 
 
 
  Although in my case, everything is done in FM 9 or with the MIF 9 format – so
 my issue has nothing to do with Frame versioning.
 
 
 
  Alison
 
 
 
  PS: All FM files used to create the Book are in a single folder with graphics
 in a series of subfolders.
 
 
 
  From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
 [mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Harvey, Peggy
  Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 7:41 AM
  To: 'framers@lists.frameusers.com'
  Subject: Relative vs. absolute links
 
 
 
  Hi Framers,
 
 
 
  FM 9 p 237 and FM 7 p576
 
 
 
  Situation: Converting files between FM 7 and FM 9. All links and file
 references are relative when I start but appear to become absolute when I
 convert either way.
 
 
 
  I need to share files with a coworker at another site. I have FM 9 and he
 has FM 7. The files, including the book file, are always all in a single
 directory with a “Graphics” subdirectory for all graphics.
 
 
 
  Here’s the sequence of events:
 
 
 
  1) The files were originally in FM 7. (When I inherited them, at least.)
 I put them on a network drive in that form, without converting them to FM 9.
 
  2) My coworker edited the files, then put them back on the network drive
 so I could do some clean up work on them. I moved them to a different network
 drive to do the work.
 
  3) I opened all of the files in FM 9, therefore converting them to FM 9
 format. I did my cleanup, including fixing the graphics path to the “Graphics”
 subfolder and fixing cross-reference links that were broken. In retrospect I
 believe cross-references within the same file were okay but cross-references
 between files were all broken.
 
  4) When I finished my work I saved each individual file and the book file
 in MIF 7.0 format. I saved the MIF files in a different folder than the FM 9
 files and copied the “Graphics” directory to the same folder as the MIF files.
 
  5) I opened each MIF file and the MIF book file in FM 7, then saved each
 one in .fm (or .book) format.
 
  6) I noticed that the book file seemed to be referring to the the
 previous files – the FM 9 files with the same names in the different folder. I
 deleted all of the file references and added all of the FM 7 files that I’d
 just created. So the FM 7 book file and individual files were all in the same
 folder.
 
  6) When I went to generate the book I got an error log that all of the
 cross-references I’d fixed in FM 9 were unresolved again. Upon further
 inspection I discovered all of the graphics had the wrong path, too – they
 were linked absolutely to the “Graphics” folder in my FM 9 folder, not to the
 relative “Graphics” folder I’d copied to the FM 7 folder.
 
 
 
  My question: Why are the links and references to files (graphics and
 cross-references) changing from relative to absolute paths when I convert from
 one version to another? At least that’s what seems to be happening, either
 when I open FM 7 files directly in FM 9 or when I go through the MIF to
 convert from FM 9 back to FM 7. Anyone have any insight to this?
 
 
 
  FYI: Our final solution is we’re STRONGLY recommending my coworker
 upgrade to FM 9 as soon as possible. I’m hoping he’ll be able to even though
 Adobe is on FM 11 now. I’ve seen the traffic on the list about FM 11; I have
 no desire to update to it at this time so I’m hoping he doesn’t have to,
 either.
 
 
 
  Thanks,
 
 
 
  Peggy
 

___


You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com.

Send list messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com.

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.


RE: Relative vs. absolute links

2013-02-27 Thread Alison Craig
I would agree, as when I send the files out – all on the same drive – 
everything works fine with relative paths.

But when they come back – still all on the same drive – they are returned with 
absolute paths.

That’s my dilemma. The relative positions of the files don’t change – but the 
paths become absolute anyway.

Note that while my version control database is on a network drive, all files 
are checked out to a local drive when they are being worked on, so there is no 
network issue, at least on my end.

Alison

From: Paul Wilbraham [mailto:paul.wilbra...@m-ais.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:30 AM
To: Alison Craig; 'framers@lists.frameusers.com'; Harvey, Peggy
Subject: RE: Relative vs. absolute links

Alison
We find that graphics on the same drive as the original files are relative. 
Graphics on a separate drive are absolute.

--Paul
On 27 February 2013 at 18:09 Alison Craig 
alison.cr...@ultrasonix.commailto:alison.cr...@ultrasonix.com wrote:
I’d love to hear an explanation as I often have the same relative/absolute 
issue with graphics and xrefs when my files are returned from the translators.

Although in my case, everything is done in FM 9 or with the MIF 9 format – so 
my issue has nothing to do with Frame versioning.

Alison

PS: All FM files used to create the Book are in a single folder with graphics 
in a series of subfolders.

From: 
framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.commailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
 [mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Harvey, Peggy
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 7:41 AM
To: 'framers@lists.frameusers.com'
Subject: Relative vs. absolute links

Hi Framers,

FM 9 p 237 and FM 7 p576

Situation: Converting files between FM 7 and FM 9. All links and file 
references are relative when I start but appear to become absolute when I 
convert either way.

I need to share files with a coworker at another site. I have FM 9 and he has 
FM 7. The files, including the book file, are always all in a single directory 
with a “Graphics” subdirectory for all graphics.

Here’s the sequence of events:

1) The files were originally in FM 7. (When I inherited them, at least.) I put 
them on a network drive in that form, without converting them to FM 9.
2) My coworker edited the files, then put them back on the network drive so I 
could do some clean up work on them. I moved them to a different network drive 
to do the work.
3) I opened all of the files in FM 9, therefore converting them to FM 9 format. 
I did my cleanup, including fixing the graphics path to the “Graphics” 
subfolder and fixing cross-reference links that were broken. In retrospect I 
believe cross-references within the same file were okay but cross-references 
between files were all broken.
4) When I finished my work I saved each individual file and the book file in 
MIF 7.0 format. I saved the MIF files in a different folder than the FM 9 files 
and copied the “Graphics” directory to the same folder as the MIF files.
5) I opened each MIF file and the MIF book file in FM 7, then saved each one in 
.fm (or .book) format.
6) I noticed that the book file seemed to be referring to the the previous 
files – the FM 9 files with the same names in the different folder. I deleted 
all of the file references and added all of the FM 7 files that I’d just 
created. So the FM 7 book file and individual files were all in the same folder.
6) When I went to generate the book I got an error log that all of the 
cross-references I’d fixed in FM 9 were unresolved again. Upon further 
inspection I discovered all of the graphics had the wrong path, too – they were 
linked absolutely to the “Graphics” folder in my FM 9 folder, not to the 
relative “Graphics” folder I’d copied to the FM 7 folder.

My question: Why are the links and references to files (graphics and 
cross-references) changing from relative to absolute paths when I convert from 
one version to another? At least that’s what seems to be happening, either when 
I open FM 7 files directly in FM 9 or when I go through the MIF to convert from 
FM 9 back to FM 7. Anyone have any insight to this?

FYI: Our final solution is we’re STRONGLY recommending my coworker upgrade to 
FM 9 as soon as possible. I’m hoping he’ll be able to even though Adobe is on 
FM 11 now. I’ve seen the traffic on the list about FM 11; I have no desire to 
update to it at this time so I’m hoping he doesn’t have to, either.

Thanks,

Peggy


___


You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com.

Send list messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com.

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.


RE: Relative vs. absolute links

2013-02-27 Thread Reng, Dr. Winfried
Hi Alison,

I would ask your translation agency what they exactly do
with your FrameMaker and graphics files. If they store the
graphics files on another drive, the paths become absolute.
That should not happen.
The agency should use the very same directory structure as
you have.

Best regards

Winfried

From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com 
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Alison Craig
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 8:06 PM
To: Paul Wilbraham; 'framers@lists.frameusers.com'; Harvey, Peggy
Subject: RE: Relative vs. absolute links

I would agree, as when I send the files out – all on the same drive – 
everything works fine with relative paths.

But when they come back – still all on the same drive – they are returned with 
absolute paths.

That’s my dilemma. The relative positions of the files don’t change – but the 
paths become absolute anyway.

Note that while my version control database is on a network drive, all files 
are checked out to a local drive when they are being worked on, so there is no 
network issue, at least on my end.

Alison

From: Paul Wilbraham [mailto:paul.wilbra...@m-ais.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:30 AM
To: Alison Craig; 'framers@lists.frameusers.com'; Harvey, Peggy
Subject: RE: Relative vs. absolute links

Alison
We find that graphics on the same drive as the original files are relative. 
Graphics on a separate drive are absolute.

--Paul
On 27 February 2013 at 18:09 Alison Craig 
alison.cr...@ultrasonix.commailto:alison.cr...@ultrasonix.com wrote:
I’d love to hear an explanation as I often have the same relative/absolute 
issue with graphics and xrefs when my files are returned from the translators.

Although in my case, everything is done in FM 9 or with the MIF 9 format – so 
my issue has nothing to do with Frame versioning.

Alison

PS: All FM files used to create the Book are in a single folder with graphics 
in a series of subfolders.

From: 
framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.commailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
 [mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Harvey, Peggy
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 7:41 AM
To: 'framers@lists.frameusers.com'
Subject: Relative vs. absolute links

Hi Framers,

FM 9 p 237 and FM 7 p576

Situation: Converting files between FM 7 and FM 9. All links and file 
references are relative when I start but appear to become absolute when I 
convert either way.

I need to share files with a coworker at another site. I have FM 9 and he has 
FM 7. The files, including the book file, are always all in a single directory 
with a “Graphics” subdirectory for all graphics.

Here’s the sequence of events:

1) The files were originally in FM 7. (When I inherited them, at least.) I put 
them on a network drive in that form, without converting them to FM 9.
2) My coworker edited the files, then put them back on the network drive so I 
could do some clean up work on them. I moved them to a different network drive 
to do the work.
3) I opened all of the files in FM 9, therefore converting them to FM 9 format. 
I did my cleanup, including fixing the graphics path to the “Graphics” 
subfolder and fixing cross-reference links that were broken. In retrospect I 
believe cross-references within the same file were okay but cross-references 
between files were all broken.
4) When I finished my work I saved each individual file and the book file in 
MIF 7.0 format. I saved the MIF files in a different folder than the FM 9 files 
and copied the “Graphics” directory to the same folder as the MIF files.
5) I opened each MIF file and the MIF book file in FM 7, then saved each one in 
.fm (or .book) format.
6) I noticed that the book file seemed to be referring to the the previous 
files – the FM 9 files with the same names in the different folder. I deleted 
all of the file references and added all of the FM 7 files that I’d just 
created. So the FM 7 book file and individual files were all in the same folder.
6) When I went to generate the book I got an error log that all of the 
cross-references I’d fixed in FM 9 were unresolved again. Upon further 
inspection I discovered all of the graphics had the wrong path, too – they were 
linked absolutely to the “Graphics” folder in my FM 9 folder, not to the 
relative “Graphics” folder I’d copied to the FM 7 folder.

My question: Why are the links and references to files (graphics and 
cross-references) changing from relative to absolute paths when I convert from 
one version to another? At least that’s what seems to be happening, either when 
I open FM 7 files directly in FM 9 or when I go through the MIF to convert from 
FM 9 back to FM 7. Anyone have any insight to this?

FYI: Our final solution is we’re STRONGLY recommending my coworker upgrade to 
FM 9 as soon as possible. I’m hoping he’ll be able to even though Adobe is on 
FM 11 now. I’ve seen the traffic on the list about FM 11; I have no desire to 
update to it at this time so I’m hoping he doesn’t