I think MIF2Go is less buggy, more configurable, and better supported
than either version of webworks. It also allows more output options.
I believe there is a trial version of MIF2Go available...
Art
On 4/2/06, Zimerman Orly wrote:
For that you would have to use either WebWorks or MIF2GO.
>
:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Brad Digest (E-mail)
Subject: [Brad Digest] Re: converting text to HTML--which tool is best?
I used to create HTML pages from Frame very frequently (at least from 6
years ago) simply by saving to HTML as well (after importing a FM template
appropriate for the online
: Saturday, April 01, 2006 10:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Brad Digest (E-mail)
Subject: [Brad Digest] Re: converting text to HTML--which tool is best?
I used to create HTML pages from Frame very frequently (at least from 6
years ago) simply by saving to HTML as well (after importing a FM template
exeros.com at lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of
Zimerman Orly
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 10:04 PM
To: gflato at nanometrics.com; Brad Digest (E-mail)
Subject: [Brad Digest] Re: converting text to HTML-->which tool is best?
I used to create HTML pages from Frame very frequently (at least fro
: Monday, April 03, 2006 12:46 PM
To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: converting text to HTML-->which tool is best?
We're facing the same decision (how to best convert FM to HTML) and would
also like to hear suggestions and comments. I've used the purchased WebWorks
before with g
I used to create HTML pages from Frame very frequently (at least from 6 years
ago) simply by saving to HTML as well (after importing a FM template
appropriate for the online files).
I'm not sure if that's what you mean by 'control/access the code".
Do you need to change the output filenames
