At 11:13 -0800 12/11/13, David Creamer wrote:
There is no direct conversion of ID to Frame. (There is a Frame to ID
conversion, however.)
Ah... maybe that was what I was thinking about: sorry...
At 10:14 -0800 12/11/13, Robert Lauriston wrote:
There's a FrameMaker MIF InDesign converter.
Which, once again, gives support to the speculation of Adobe wanting to get
rid of FM. :-(
Brgds,
Bodvar Bjorgvinsson
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Steve Rickaby
srick...@wordmongers.demon.co.uk wrote:
At 11:13 -0800 12/11/13, David Creamer wrote:
There is no direct conversion of ID
No, not really. Just that the software designers have not thought much
past their immediate brief.
They are both end-of-production-process applications and the output from
them is considered to be what will be required for output purposes not
for further post-processing by other programs that
At 11:13 -0800 12/11/13, David Creamer wrote:
>There is no direct conversion of ID to Frame. (There is a Frame to ID
>conversion, however.)
Ah... maybe that was what I was thinking about: sorry...
At 10:14 -0800 12/11/13, Robert Lauriston wrote:
>There's a FrameMaker > MIF > InDesign
---
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20131116/2438a64c/attachment.html>
eusers.com/ for more resources and info.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20131116/5ee76daa/attachment.html>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed
Not really. MIF FIlter has been around since at least 2005 and it's
not an Adobe product.
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 6:11 AM, B??var Bj?rgvinsson
wrote:
>
> Which, once again, gives support to the speculation of Adobe wanting to get
> rid of FM. :-(
>
> Brgds,
> Bodvar Bjorgvinsson
>
>
>
>
> On
