+mike.feimster=acstechnologies.com at lists.frameuse
rs.com] On Behalf Of Milan Davidovic
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 11:52 AM
To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: anticipating a move to Structured Frame
--- russ at weststreetconsulting.com wrote:
> I'd like to point out that structured Fr
--- russ at weststreetconsulting.com wrote:
> I'd like to point out that structured Frame does not
> necessarily mean topic-based authoring, XML,
> information mapping, or DITA. You can get lots of
> benefit from it without any of those things.
Such as facilitating compliance with house style?
M
11:52 AM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: anticipating a move to Structured Frame
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'd like to point out that structured Frame does not
> necessarily mean topic-based authoring, XML,
> information mapping, or DITA. You can get lots of
>
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'd like to point out that structured Frame does not
> necessarily mean topic-based authoring, XML,
> information mapping, or DITA. You can get lots of
> benefit from it without any of those things.
Such as facilitating compliance with house style?
Milan
http://alt
Among other news, getting data into one structured
format makes it much easier to convert to others
later.
--- russ at weststreetconsulting.com wrote:
> "Paradigm shifts" and all those things the DITA camp
> seems to believe are a bit frightening to the
> average author, and for good reason. You
Yves (and Milan),
I'd like to point out that structured Frame does not necessarily mean
topic-based authoring, XML, information mapping, or DITA. You can get lots of
benefit from it without any of those things. I think that when you present
structured Frame in this light, you misrepresent the p
Among other news, getting data into one structured
format makes it much easier to convert to others
later.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "Paradigm shifts" and all those things the DITA camp
> seems to believe are a bit frightening to the
> average author, and for good reason. You can use
> struc
Yves (and Milan),
I'd like to point out that structured Frame does not necessarily mean
topic-based authoring, XML, information mapping, or DITA. You can get lots of
benefit from it without any of those things. I think that when you present
structured Frame in this light, you misrepresent the p
