Hi Hanno and framework team members,
just a quick question in passing: looking at plip 148
(move to CMF 2.1) I noticed that Plone has a hard
dependency on PIL there at the moment. Moving
'scale_image' into CMFPlone/utils.py resulted in
an unconditioned
from PIL import Image
which of course
Hello from the St. Augustin sprint :)
Raphael Ritz wrote:
Hello again,
this is just a service to those of you who do not follow the svn/plone
commits ;-)
2006-09-12 Raphael Ritz ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
My test set-up: Python 2.4.3, Zope 2.10.0b2 release on Linux (FC5)
First
On 3:12 pm 09/12/06 Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think a dependency is probably OK, even though it would annoy me to
have to do it for all development instances. The swinger for me is
the recent security problems that we've had to use PIL to get around.
Is it possible to disable
Previously Alec Mitchell wrote:
It's not possible to start Plone if PIL is not installed currently
(due to the member image fix). PIL is included in all the installers
AFAIK, and is a package in every distro I've known. So installing PIL
is generally as easy as installing python (whether you
Raphael Ritz wrote:
What would be really nice to have for our add-on developers:
- a hands-on, fool-proof guide on how to update 3rd-party products
for Plone 3.0. In particular this should contain (pointers to)
instructions on supporting and using GenericSetup
I don't think we
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Raphael Ritz wrote:
What would be really nice to have for our add-on developers:
- a hands-on, fool-proof guide on how to update 3rd-party products
for Plone 3.0. In particular this should contain (pointers to)
instructions on supporting and using
Alec Mitchell wrote:
On 9/12/06, Raphael Ritz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hanno Schlichting schrieb:
What would be really nice to have for our add-on developers:
- a hands-on, fool-proof guide on how to update 3rd-party products
for Plone 3.0. In particular this should contain
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
- It doesn't show up in the control panel's Add/Remove Products pages
- There not really a sane way to uninstall a GS extension profile
Now this statements isn't completely true for some minutes anymore.
People watching the collective-checkins mailing list closely
Changes from stock Plone
This bundle features two modifications from standard Plone:
* adds the new SessionCrumbler product from collective
* Uses a modified PlonePAS
PlonePAS modifications
--
The PlonePAS modifications are restricted to
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 13:15:08 -0700, wichert
svn-changes-z4DKO/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+Using sessions means that ZEO clusters will not work out of the box: the
+session storage is not shared between ZEO clients. This needs to be
explicitly
+documented in release notes.
Not only
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:53:46 -0700, Hanno Schlichting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course this is not a good long term approach as it still has the QI
problems, but I think this is a good option for the time we need to
build proper uninstall into GenericSetup (or based on it).
Has anyone
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:34:33 -0700, Alec Mitchell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We need to make sure that it can be easily disabled in case the
performance overhead of using Sessions is too much for some
applications.
Does anyone have any idea what approach people like Google (Gmail etc) use
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 08:19:21PM -0700, Alexander Limi wrote:
| On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 13:15:08 -0700, wichert
| svn-changes-z4DKO/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| +Using sessions means that ZEO clusters will not work out of the box: the
| +session storage is not shared between ZEO clients. This
On 9/12/06, Alexander Limi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:34:33 -0700, Alec Mitchell
apm13-WLbs8XpHrcb2fBVCVOL8/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We need to make sure that it can be easily disabled in case the
performance overhead of using Sessions is too much for some
14 matches
Mail list logo
