hi guys,
i'm afraid i'm pretty much swamped with work- and family obligations
until february 12th when i'll return from the GSM World trade fair in
barcelona. until then i'm daily at a client where we are prepping a
(plone based!) demo app for the tradeshow and/or at home looking after
a big 'thank you' from me, too. i think the changes you mentioned are
well worth including in 3.1 and i will definitely review this plip,
too (also it fits quite nicely with florian's jquery plip)
again, i will try to fit this in before the 12th (but no promises...)
cheers,
tom
On
On Jan 31, 2008, at 5:22 PM, Tom Lazar wrote:
a big 'thank you' from me, too. i think the changes you mentioned
are well worth including in 3.1 and i will definitely review this
plip, too (also it fits quite nicely with florian's jquery plip)
as well as this one, too[*].
andi
[*]
On Jan 31, 2008, at 5:12 PM, Tom Lazar wrote:
hi guys,
hey there,
i'm afraid i'm pretty much swamped with work- and family obligations
until february 12th [...]
well, not so good news, but thanks for replying anyway.
i am however, for instance, extremely interested in florian's jquery
On Jan 30, 2008, at 10:37 AM, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
ok, fair enough. but again, could you go ahead and assign the
tickets you're planning to work on to yourself asap? we really need
to have someone responsible for each ticket, or else i'm afraid
they'll just linger...
guys, we still
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
See http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/224 for details.
I absolutely hate to do this since it violates our process and we
already have a large number of PLIPs waiting for review, but I am
proposing this PLIP for Plone 3.1.
Anarchist as I am I have no problem
Previously Raphael Ritz wrote:
There is one question I have already now: Who feels responsible
for updating the forms that ship with Plone/AT to make use of
this? (or am I missing something?) And don't get me wrong:
I have no problem shipping it even without using it right away
just to make
On Jan 31, 2008, at 9:32 PM, Raphael Ritz wrote:
Sorry Andy, this should have gone to the list.
np :)
Andreas Zeidler wrote:
oh, and raphael, could you let us know which ones you started with,
please? or better yet, assign them to yourself.
At the moment I've prepared for (aka
On Jan 31, 2008, at 7:15 PM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
See http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/224 for details.
I absolutely hate to do this since it violates our process and we
already have a large number of PLIPs waiting for review, but I am
proposing this PLIP for Plone 3.1.
definitely a
On Jan 31, 2008, at 9:20 PM, Raphael Ritz wrote:
At this moment I do not have a review bundle ready; I'm hoping that
someone will beat me to it since I have very little time to work on
it.
OK, so I'll take on the role of beating you to this and I'll
try to sneak in a review during the sprint
how about getting the important ones done for 3.1 and perhaps making
generic support a PLIP for 3.2?
andi
ps: thanks wichert for coming up with those two packages so quickly,
btw!
On Jan 31, 2008, at 9:55 PM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
A few quick comments:
It is only important for the
11 matches
Mail list logo
