On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 06:40:34 -0800, Ricardo Alves
wrote:
Sorry if I missed some discussion/decision on this, but the place for
PLIP submission is now trac? Or are these just drafts that will
eventually origin PLIP's at plone.org?
There has been some informal discussion here and there, an
On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 06:20:34 -0800, Martijn Pieters
wrote:
It's a pity Trac doesn't support ticket detail changes; there is a
plugin for Trac 0.11 that supports this (see
http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/DetailedRssFeedPlugin) but dev.plone.org
still runs on 0.10.
Hopefully not for much longer. :
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 04:55:34 -0800, Matthew Wilkes
wrote:
PLIPs have their own numbering and are currently stored exclusively on
plone.org.
Actually, for 4.0 and later, we're moving them all to Trac. That way, we
can assign them to releases, track them separately, and use the update
fe
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 23:52, Ross Patterson wrote:
> I just subscribed my RSS reader to the feed for the 4.0 PLIP report and
> then added myself as a CC to every ticket in that report so that I can
> keep an eye on activity. I'll also have to keep an eye for new tickets
> on the feed to make su
Jens W. Klein wrote:
> In your PLIPs you wrote i.e. here https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/8593
> to remove parts out of "Plone the Product". I fully agree to remove
> features from the core!
>
> But I think if we do so, there should be a set of "Managed Plone
> Products". Important add-ons l
