On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Laurence Rowe wrote:
> What happened in the 3.x series, I thought the 3.0 team stayed on.
No. One member of the team stayed on from the 3.0 team for the 3.1
team. The 3.1 team then stayed the same for the 3.2 and 3.3 releases.
The main idea here was that the x.0
On 12 March 2010 01:24, Matthew Wilkes wrote:
>
> On 2010-03-09, at 0250, Eric Steele wrote:
>
>> So... now that those bums are out the door, how do we go about appointing
>> a 4.x team for me to abuse?
>
> Well, on a more general note, I think we need a bit better separation
> between the 4.x and
On 2010-03-09, at 0250, Eric Steele wrote:
So... now that those bums are out the door, how do we go about
appointing a 4.x team for me to abuse?
Well, on a more general note, I think we need a bit better separation
between the 4.x and 5.x teams to avoid conflicts between the needs of
4.x
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Eric Steele wrote:
> I've just finished getting the last bits of 4.0b1 to wherever they need to
> be. I'll give it another 24 hours of soft-release before handing it over to
> the installers folks to make sure everything is there. If I understand this
> whole Plo
I've just finished getting the last bits of 4.0b1 to wherever they need to be.
I'll give it another 24 hours of soft-release before handing it over to the
installers folks to make sure everything is there. If I understand this whole
Plone process correctly (and I'm not at all sure I do), this me
