Re: [Framework-Team] FWT Meeting Notes: 8 March, 2011

2011-03-14 Thread Steve McMahon
But if you need assistance — sprint funding, facilitators ... — just ask! On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Jon Stahl wrote: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Hanno Schlichting > wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Eric Steele wrote: > >>• Eric will contact board RE: increasing t

Re: [Framework-Team] FWT Meeting Notes: 8 March, 2011

2011-03-09 Thread Jon Stahl
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Hanno Schlichting wrote: > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Eric Steele wrote: >>        • Eric will contact board RE: increasing team size to 10. > > The board isn't involved in any matters concerning the way we develop > Plone - this is up to the active developmen

Re: [Framework-Team] FWT Meeting Notes: 8 March, 2011

2011-03-09 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Eric Steele wrote: >        • Eric will contact board RE: increasing team size to 10. The board isn't involved in any matters concerning the way we develop Plone - this is up to the active development community. The framework team members have so far been selected

Re: [Framework-Team] FWT Meeting Notes: 8 March, 2011

2011-03-09 Thread Wichert Akkerman
On 3/9/11 00:10 , Ross Patterson wrote: Elizabeth Leddy writes: How to do an initial PLIP review I'm not even sure where to start here. Ideas? - is it formatted correctly - what dependencies would it introduce - what backwards compatibility impacts will it have (different for mi

Re: [Framework-Team] FWT Meeting Notes: 8 March, 2011

2011-03-08 Thread Ross Patterson
Elizabeth Leddy writes: >    How to do an initial PLIP review > > I'm not even sure where to start here. Ideas? - is it formatted correctly - what dependencies would it introduce - what backwards compatibility impacts will it have (different for minor vs major versions) - does this belong

Re: [Framework-Team] FWT Meeting Notes: 8 March, 2011

2011-03-08 Thread Elizabeth Leddy
> > Is there any documentation floating around on how to actually do a proper > review? > > I feel like I saw some at some point but I can't find it again. I think > we need to > > have this ready so that we don't get bad reviews from the non FWT > reviewers. > > Yeah, I'd really like to see a numb

Re: [Framework-Team] FWT Meeting Notes: 8 March, 2011

2011-03-08 Thread Ross Patterson
Eric Steele writes: > • TODO: Go through existing PLIPs to cull dead ones, find implementers > for others > • https://dev.plone.org/plone/report/24 > • Move existing PLIPS to "Orphaned" > • Ross will contact orphaned plip implementers to see if they're still > interested

Re: [Framework-Team] FWT Meeting Notes: 8 March, 2011

2011-03-08 Thread Ross Patterson
Elizabeth Leddy writes: > Is there any documentation floating around on how to actually do a proper > review? > I feel like I saw some at some point but I can't find it again. I think we > need to > have this ready so that we don't get bad reviews from the non FWT reviewers. Yeah, I'd really l

Re: [Framework-Team] FWT Meeting Notes: 8 March, 2011

2011-03-08 Thread Elizabeth Leddy
Is there any documentation floating around on how to actually do a proper review? I feel like I saw some at some point but I can't find it again. I think we need to have this ready so that we don't get bad reviews from the non FWT reviewers. Liz On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Eric Steele wrot

[Framework-Team] FWT Meeting Notes: 8 March, 2011

2011-03-08 Thread Eric Steele
Attending: Eric Steele, Craig Haynal, Alec Mitchell, Elizabeth Leddy, Ross Patterson, Martijn Pieters Absent: Laurence Rowe, Rob Gietema, Matthew Wilkes • Empower the release manager and PLIP authors to demand what they should expect from the FWT • Each PLIP should have a designa