Re: [Framework-Team] Re: update on supporting Python 2.6 / Zope 2.12 / CMF 2.2

2009-06-25 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On Jun 20, 2009, at 5:54 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote: On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Martin Aspeli> wrote: - c20188, c20190, c23197 — removal of PloneFolder (hannosch) — need to double check whether this requires a migration for any persistent objects, and write that if necessary +0 to

[Framework-Team] Re: update on supporting Python 2.6 / Zope 2.12 / CMF 2.2

2009-06-22 Thread Alexander Limi
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 17:21:55 -0700, Hanno Schlichting wrote: This uses PTS trunk which doesn't have a persistent representation in the ZMI Control_Panel anymore, but hooks directly into zope.i18n and registers all po files independent of their location in locales or i18n folders as zope.i18n

[Framework-Team] Re: update on supporting Python 2.6 / Zope 2.12 / CMF 2.2

2009-06-22 Thread Alexander Limi
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:38:28 -0700, Martin Aspeli wrote: I think it's important that Plone has at least a welcome page when you install it. Staring at a blank folder_listing is going to put off new users. We can probably bet rid of the News and Events collections, though. We can potent

[Framework-Team] Re: update on supporting Python 2.6 / Zope 2.12 / CMF 2.2

2009-06-21 Thread Laurence Rowe
Ross Patterson wrote: I think it's important that Plone has at least a welcome page when you install it. Staring at a blank folder_listing is going to put off new users. We can probably bet rid of the News and Events collections, though. I think I'd be opposed to removing the initial content, i

[Framework-Team] Re: update on supporting Python 2.6 / Zope 2.12 / CMF 2.2

2009-06-21 Thread Ross Patterson
Martin Aspeli writes: >> >> Well, I really hate having default content around, that I have to >> delete all the time and people use in tests that later on break if we >> change it. The initial content just won't make sense for many sites >> and people waste huge amount of times to try to get the

[Framework-Team] Re: update on supporting Python 2.6 / Zope 2.12 / CMF 2.2

2009-06-20 Thread Martin Aspeli
Hi Hanno, Well, I really hate having default content around, that I have to delete all the time and people use in tests that later on break if we change it. The initial content just won't make sense for many sites and people waste huge amount of times to try to get the initial content to match

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: update on supporting Python 2.6 / Zope 2.12 / CMF 2.2

2009-06-20 Thread Maurits van Rees
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 05:54:17PM +0200, Hanno Schlichting wrote: > On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote: > > +1 to make Plone all unicode, all of the time. I defer to Hanno, though. > > There's quite a number of interesting implications with this, for > example what is getting c

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: update on supporting Python 2.6 / Zope 2.12 / CMF 2.2

2009-06-20 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote: >> - c20188, c20190, c23197 — removal of PloneFolder (hannosch) — need to >>  double check whether this requires a migration for any persistent  objects, >> and write that if necessary > > +0 to remove. There's no persistent stuff based on tha

[Framework-Team] Re: update on supporting Python 2.6 / Zope 2.12 / CMF 2.2

2009-06-20 Thread Martin Aspeli
Hi David, Hello! I'm hoping to give an update on my work this past week and get some feedback on whether I'm heading in the right direction. I suspect you are. ;-) And let me just say I, for one, am really grateful you're doing this. As some of you may have noticed, I've been working on a