Re: [Framework-Team] today's meeting

2009-07-29 Thread Eric Steele
On Jul 29, 2009, at 12:26 PM, David Glick wrote: ... * PLIP handoffs. What sort of info do we expect from PLIP authors when they submit their PLIPs? For my 3.3 PLIPs I did a writeup like http://svn.plone.org/svn/plone/review/plip240-locking-improvements/PLIP_240_README.txt ...now that I'm i

Re: [Framework-Team] today's meeting

2009-07-29 Thread Eric Steele
On Jul 29, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote: On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 6:26 PM, David Glick wrote: A couple things I'd like to talk about: * Upgrade policy. Currently Plone 3 supports migrations from Plone <= 2.0.5. I was hoping to be able to do that for Plone 4 as well, but there

Re: [Framework-Team] today's meeting

2009-07-29 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 6:26 PM, David Glick wrote: > A couple things I'd like to talk about: > * Upgrade policy.  Currently Plone 3 supports migrations from Plone <= > 2.0.5.  I was hoping to be able to do that for Plone 4 as well, but there is > a tradeoff.  Plone 4 no longer has any runtime depe

[Framework-Team] today's meeting

2009-07-29 Thread David Glick
A couple things I'd like to talk about: * Upgrade policy. Currently Plone 3 supports migrations from Plone <= 2.0.5. I was hoping to be able to do that for Plone 4 as well, but there is a tradeoff. Plone 4 no longer has any runtime dependency on GroupUserFolder, so I was hoping we wouldn

[Framework-Team] today's meeting

2009-07-29 Thread David Glick
A couple things I'd like to talk about: * Upgrade policy. Currently Plone 3 supports migrations from Plone <= 2.0.5. I was hoping to be able to do that for Plone 4 as well, but there is a tradeoff. Plone 4 no longer has any runtime dependency on GroupUserFolder, so I was hoping we wouldn