On Dec 23, 2007, at 3:14 PM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
To be clear, I believe the only -1 vote on #187 was primarily due to
some concerns about the shortage of detail in the PLIP text. A
concern I share. I'm hoping Sidnei fleshes out the details
soon. :-)
I would gladly answer any
Thanks again Sidnei,
[note to framework list: let me know if I should take this
discussion off list]
Maybe I'm missing something but there doesn't seem to be any reason
to return a 404 (Not Found) or 403 (Forbidding) response. Why not
just silently discard the offending files, along
On Dec 24, 2007 6:36 PM, Ricardo Newbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks again Sidnei,
[note to framework list: let me know if I should take this
discussion off list]
Maybe I'm missing something but there doesn't seem to be any reason
to return a 404 (Not Found) or 403 (Forbidding)
Ricardo Newbery wrote:
Thanks again Sidnei,
[note to framework list: let me know if I should take this discussion
off list]
No problem with me. You might want to consider cross-posting
or moving to plone-devel depending on the audience you want
to reach.
Just my 2 cents,
Raphael
On Dec 23, 2007, at 12:47 PM, Raphael Ritz wrote:
Andreas Zeidler wrote:
[..]
* Rapahel on #187
please also try to cast those asap. that said, how long do we
want to wait for those missing votes and do we have a plan on how
to proceed if they don't arrive? i'd suggest waiting
To be clear, I believe the only -1 vote on #187 was primarily due to
some concerns about the shortage of detail in the PLIP text. A
concern I share. I'm hoping Sidnei fleshes out the details soon. :-)
I would gladly answer any questions. The PLIP doesn't have much detail
because there ain't
