I wrote:
cringe at the idea of project management software
CalDAV ... blah blah
On 7 Feb 2008, at 08:56, Martin Aspeli wrote:
I fear that doing project management on a per-PLIP basis adds more
overhead than value, at least if people don't actually live the
project management software
On Feb 14, 2008, at 7:19 AM, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Feb 7, 2008, at 1:01 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Once you post your reviews (here?) what happens? How does the team
arrive at a final yes/no vote? How long does that take?
hmm, i can't decide on these, of course, but i'd still like to try
Steve McMahon wrote:
Thanks for the great review and suggestions, Martijn!
I'm pleased to report that the PID problem is taken care of. Nouri
fixed it for zope2instance in:
http://dev.plone.org/collective/changeset/55898
and for zope2zeoserver in:
On Feb 14, 2008, at 1:22 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
otherwise we should have a complete set of votes by monday night, at
which point i'll post the verdict or rather the recommendations of
the framework team. that should leave enough time for merging and
last-minute polishing before the alpha
Graham Perrin wrote:
[..]
High quality improvements to Plone, and actions from (for example) the
Summit, are to me far more satisfying than a fixed schedule for
upgrading.
Glad you see it this way ;-)
And to add to the general theme (process):
At least in my case it wasn't about lack of
This is about kss inline validation of formlib fields.
Functionally, it works as advertised but there's a
little issue with the feedback to the user as the
portal status message can get out of sync.
For more see
http://dev.plone.org/plone/changeset/19238
and for the implementation of the
Raphael, 2008-02-12:
nothing to add to Andi's comments; +1 from me as well
On the cosmetic side I'd like to see the following warnings disappear:
/home/ritz/.buildout/zope/Zope-2.10.5-final/lib/python/zope/configuration/fields.py:417:
UserWarning: You did not specify an i18n translation
Previously Florian Schulze wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:38:56 +0100, Raphael Ritz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(i) when describing start/stop/status we might want to add
'fg' (foreground) as a simple means to start in debug mode
without changing the configuration
AFAIK this doesn't work
Florian Schulze wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:23:41 +0100, Wichert Akkerman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Previously Florian Schulze wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:38:56 +0100, Raphael Ritz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(i) when describing start/stop/status we might want to add
'fg' (foreground) as a
It runs, yes, but it doesn't switch to debug mode.
This should have been fixed in plone.recipe.zope2instance 1.2 by:
http://dev.plone.org/collective/changeset/56654
If you've got that version or later and bin/instance fg isn't
working for you, please file a ticket at
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Raphael Ritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:38:56 +0100, Raphael Ritz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(i) when describing start/stop/status we might want to add
'fg' (foreground) as a simple means to start in debug mode
without
11 matches
Mail list logo
