#10846: Include plone.testing and plone.app.testing in KGS
+---
Reporter: optilude|Owner: optilude
Type: PLIP| Status: new
Priority: minor |Milestone: 4.1
FWT,
At last week's meeting, we agreed that we need 3 reviews per PLIP. I want to
get the first 5 wrapped up during tomorrow's meeting so we can move on to the
slew that'll be coming in over the next week.
We're nearly there, most just need one more completed review.
Needs 1 more review:
Dear Framework Team!
The name plone.app.event for the event improvement package (see:
http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/10886 ) was proposed by me at the
cathedral sprint in Cologne. But since then I often think that this
wasn't the best possible name. It's too ambiguous because it may impose
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
plone.app.calendar is even more misleading since plone.app.event
provides only the event core implementation but not calendar
functionality (or?). I think plone.app.event is fine since Plone
developers know of ATEvent and speaking of plone.app.event
#10776: Update to Zope 2.13
+---
Reporter: hannosch|Owner: hannosch
Type: PLIP| Status: assigned
Priority: minor |Milestone: 4.1
Component: Infrastructure |
#10776: Update to Zope 2.13
+---
Reporter: hannosch|Owner: hannosch
Type: PLIP| Status: assigned
Priority: minor |Milestone: 4.1
Component: Infrastructure |
#10776: Update to Zope 2.13
+---
Reporter: hannosch|Owner: hannosch
Type: PLIP| Status: assigned
Priority: minor |Milestone: 4.1
Component: Infrastructure |
#10778: Standalone UUID implementation
+---
Reporter: optilude|Owner: optilude
Type: PLIP| Status: new
Priority: minor |Milestone: 4.1
Component:
#10776: Update to Zope 2.13
+---
Reporter: hannosch|Owner: hannosch
Type: PLIP| Status: assigned
Priority: minor |Milestone: 4.1
Component: Infrastructure |
