#10846: Include plone.testing and plone.app.testing in KGS
+---
Reporter: optilude|Owner: optilude
Type: PLIP| Status: closed
Priority: minor |Milestone: 4.1
#9472: Include plone.app.registry
+---
Reporter: erikrose|Owner: optilude
Type: PLIP| Status: closed
Priority: major |Milestone: 4.1
Component:
#10877: Separate Products.CMFPlone from the Plone egg and its optional
dependencies
+---
Reporter: ldr |Owner: ldr
Type: PLIP| Status: closed
Priority: minor |
#10886: plone.app.event - new eventtype for plone
+---
Reporter: thet| Owner: thet
Type: PLIP| Status: new
Priority: minor |
#10778: Standalone UUID implementation
+---
Reporter: optilude|Owner: optilude
Type: PLIP| Status: closed
Priority: minor |Milestone: 4.1
Component:
#10745: Packaging updates for 3rd party Javascript
+---
Reporter: MatthewWilkes |Type: PLIP
Status: closed |Priority: minor
Milestone: 4.1| Component: Javascript
#9938: factor custom output transformations out of the editors
+---
Reporter: davisagli |Owner: davisagli
Type: PLIP| Status: closed
Priority: minor |Milestone: 4.1
Attending: Eric Steele, Craig Haynal, Alec Mitchell, Elizabeth Leddy, Ross
Patterson, Martijn Pieters
Absent: Laurence Rowe, Rob Gietema, Matthew Wilkes
• Empower the release manager and PLIP authors to demand what they
should expect from the FWT
• Each PLIP should have a
Is there any documentation floating around on how to actually do a proper
review? I feel like I saw some at some point but I can't find it again. I
think we need to have this ready so that we don't get bad reviews from the
non FWT reviewers.
Liz
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Eric Steele
#10886: plone.app.event - new eventtype for plone
+---
Reporter: thet| Owner: thet
Type: PLIP| Status: new
Priority: minor |
#10888: Make KSS optional
+---
Reporter: davisagli | Owner: davisagli
Type: PLIP| Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Future
Component: KSS (Ajax) |Keywords:
#10900: Use popup forms (overlays) for portlet editing
+---
Reporter: smcmahon| Owner: smcmahon
Type: PLIP| Status: assigned
Priority: minor | Milestone: Future
Component:
#10959: API for password validation policy
-+--
Reporter: djay | Owner:
Type: PLIP | Status: new
Priority: minor| Milestone: Future
Component: Unknown |Keywords:
#10902: New collections (merged plip)
-+--
Reporter: elvix| Owner: jaroel
Type: PLIP | Status: new
Priority: minor| Milestone: 4.2
Component: Unknown |Keywords:
#9324: Use Amberjack to offer guided help for first-time users
---+
Reporter: limi | Owner: massimo
Type: PLIP | Status: new
Priority: n/a| Milestone: Future
Is there any documentation floating around on how to actually do a proper
review?
I feel like I saw some at some point but I can't find it again. I think
we need to
have this ready so that we don't get bad reviews from the non FWT
reviewers.
Yeah, I'd really like to see a number of PLIP
Elizabeth Leddy ele...@umich.edu writes:
How to do an initial PLIP review
I'm not even sure where to start here. Ideas?
- is it formatted correctly
- what dependencies would it introduce
- what backwards compatibility impacts will it have
(different for minor vs major versions)
-
#10902: New collections (merged plip)
-+--
Reporter: elvix| Owner: jaroel
Type: PLIP | Status: new
Priority: minor| Milestone: 4.2
Component: Unknown |Keywords:
18 matches
Mail list logo