Re: [Framework-Team] Re: first merges

2006-10-08 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Hanno Schlichting wrote: Aren't we supposed to have an official vote on what PLIP's we think are ready for inclusion? We are supposed to decide, I'm not sure if we need to actually vote. I'ld like to turn this around a little bit: the four PLIPs that are currently ready for merging

[Framework-Team] Re: first merges

2006-10-08 Thread Martin Aspeli
Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously Hanno Schlichting wrote: Aren't we supposed to have an official vote on what PLIP's we think are ready for inclusion? We are supposed to decide, I'm not sure if we need to actually vote. I'ld like to turn this around a little bit: the four PLIPs that are

[Framework-Team] Re: first merges

2006-10-08 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi again. Wichert Akkerman wrote: If there are no objections I think we should merge these four PLIPs into trunk in the next couple of days: PLIP 8 - Versioning PLIP 118 - Portlets engine based on PlonePortlets and Viewlets

[Framework-Team] Re: first merges

2006-10-07 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. Wichert Akkerman wrote: If there are no objections I think we should merge these four PLIPs into trunk in the next couple of days: Aren't we supposed to have an official vote on what PLIP's we think are ready for inclusion? In case anybody agrees with me, here are my votes: PLIP 8 -

[Framework-Team] Re: first merges

2006-10-06 Thread Rocky Burt
On Fri, 2006-06-10 at 14:11 +0100, Martin Aspeli wrote: Also - is anyone reviewing the content rules bundle? I want to put some more time into that, and harass Markus into doing so as well. It's in a similar state to the portlets bundle - needs more actions/conditions and UI improvements and a