Wichert Akkerman wrote:
[..]
If you draw this up you basically get a matrix of views with a
content-type axis and a tile-type axes. Something like:
| main content | portlet | search result | folderlisting
---+---+---+-+
Raphael Ritz wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
[..]
If you draw this up you basically get a matrix of views with a
content-type axis and a tile-type axes. Something like:
| main content | portlet | search result | folderlisting
---+---+---+--
Previously Raphael Ritz wrote:
> Tom Lazar wrote:
> >there is, however, one issue i'd like to bring up, namely if it would
> >be a desirable behaviour, if uninstalling ProductOne would also
> >uninstall ProductTwo. since there is a current trend of 'exploding'
> >products into smaller, re-usable
Martin Aspeli wrote:
[..]
In the spirit of thinking aloud, I think even that is not general
enough. I think the easiest approach will be to use "pure" Zope 3 and
register these as different views providing different marker interfaces
or something like that. That way, you can tile something
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
[..]
There are enough utility methods to figure that out: QI has some methods
to determine which GS profile belongs to a package and GS can give you
the list of dependencies for a profile.
But it can only do so if the product/add-on author has
formalized the depen
