[Framework-Team] Re: [plone4] - Initial PLIP drafts coming in

In your PLIPs you wrote i.e. here https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/8593 to remove parts out of "Plone the Product". I fully agree to remove features from the core! But I think if we do so, there should be a set of "Managed Plone Products". Important add-ons like LinguaPlone or the removed pa

[Framework-Team] PLIPs for milestone 4 and beyond in Trac: occasional conversion from type 'Feature Request'?

I assume that in exceptional circumstances (imagine a very well formed Feature Request) a Feature Request (type) in Trac may be converted to a PLIP (type). True or false? Too soon to ask? ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.o

[Framework-Team] Trac report {24} for Improvement Proposals (PLIPs) for milestone 4 and beyond

On 23 Dec 2008, at 02:00, Alexander Limi wrote: And here's a first stab at a report to track these: http://dev.plone.org/plone/report/24 Excellent to see Trac being used in this way. Thanks. I wondered about a column to indicate priority, then realised that priority is already indicated by

Re: [Framework-Team] Trac report {24} for Improvement Proposals (PLIPs) for milestone 4 and beyond

On 23 Dec 2008, at 12:50, Graham Perrin wrote: Excellent to see Trac being used in this way. Thanks. Ah, hadn't noticed this thread yet, sorry. If we're going to use Trac for PLIPs I'd say we need the same or similar workflow to what we currently have and have some policy on priorities,

Re: [Framework-Team] PLIPs for milestone 4 and beyond in Trac: occasional conversion from type 'Feature Request'?

On 23 Dec 2008, at 12:47, Graham Perrin wrote: I assume that in exceptional circumstances (imagine a very well formed Feature Request) a Feature Request (type) in Trac may be converted to a PLIP (type). PLIPs have their own numbering and are currently stored exclusively on plone.org. I'

[Framework-Team] PLIP equality, priorities, workflow

On 23 Dec 2008, at 13:01, Matthew Wilkes wrote: all PLIPs should be created equal. +1 If we're going to use Trac for PLIPs +1 some policy on priorities A primary guide to prioritising is: the milestone. some policy on priorities Already at I

[Framework-Team] PLIP numbering scheme in PHC on plone.org and PLIPs in Trac

On 23 Dec 2008, at 12:55, Matthew Wilkes wrote: PLIPs have their own numbering and are currently stored exclusively on plone.org. On 23 Dec 2008, at 13:01, Matthew wrote: the same or similar workflow to what we currently have To what extent does the plone.org (PHC) tradition, with or with

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: [plone4] - Initial PLIP drafts coming in

Alexander Limi wrote: On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:06:38 -0800, Hanno Schlichting wrote: I've started to write up initial PLIP drafts for the major changes that have already been implemented on SVN trunk and that I want to do for 4.0. They can be found in Trac and are associated with the 4.0 miles

[Framework-Team] FWT trac user for CC's that will post trac activity to this list

I just subscribed my RSS reader to the feed for the 4.0 PLIP report and then added myself as a CC to every ticket in that report so that I can keep an eye on activity. I'll also have to keep an eye for new tickets on the feed to make sure I'm on the CC list. It occurred to me that I would prefer