On Tue, 05 May 2009 16:57:21 +0200, Hanno Schlichting
wrote:
Hi.
To summarize the feedback from the European time zone, I think that the
proposal in general meets the favor of everyone.
The controversial issue is the exact version number to use for the
release. There seems to be broad suppo
On May 27, 2009, at 1:47 PM, Matthew Wilkes wrote:
On 26 May 2009, at 10:59, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
I think someone has to try and see what kind of changes are acutally
required to make a current Plone 3.3rc3 run on Zope 2.12 or even
better
a real client side with a collection of add-ons.
On 30 May 2009, at 22:23, David Glick wrote:
Raphael raised a question about the consequences of backwards-
incompatible changes for add-on developers. Switching to a newer
Zope and CMF will indeed probably have some consequences. But this
is a major version bump of Plone, so I think it's
On May 30, 2009, at 3:01 PM, Matthew Wilkes wrote:
On 30 May 2009, at 22:23, David Glick wrote:
Raphael raised a question about the consequences of backwards-
incompatible changes for add-on developers. Switching to a newer
Zope and CMF will indeed probably have some consequences. But this
Eric-
Congratulations... at our last meeting this past Thursday, May 28, the
Plone Foundation board officially voted to appoint you release manager
for Plone 4!
On behalf of the entire Plone community, we offer you our deepest
appreciation -- Plone is an amazing volunteer effort from hundred
