Hi all,
I'd like to open a public discussion on where tracs should be. As
some of you may know, I'm very much against the PLIPs-in-trac system
that has been implemented following out-of-band discussions last year.
I think we need to make a proper decision, I'm not sure how that will
happ
I'm in agreement that the plone.org system is preferable; however I
think it's probably a little late to change this. It does seem like
the "PLIPs" submitted so far are mostly unstructured feature requests.
Even the better ones are pretty minimal.
Alec
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Matthew
W
Alec Mitchell wrote:
I'm in agreement that the plone.org system is preferable; however I
think it's probably a little late to change this. It does seem like
the "PLIPs" submitted so far are mostly unstructured feature requests.
Even the better ones are pretty minimal.
I think the same, most
Hi.
Where and how to manage PLIP's is both a matter of a defined process
and some software supporting this process.
One of the main driving reasons to move all Plone Core development
related information into Trac, was to have one place to manage and get
an overview of all relevant information. If
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:48:24PM +0100, Matthew Wilkes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to open a public discussion on where tracs should be. As some
> of you may know, I'm very much against the PLIPs-in-trac system that has
> been implemented following out-of-band discussions last year.
>
> I th
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 2:03 AM, Maurits van Rees wrote:
> I do not really mind either way. But I talked with Jean-Paul Ladage
> about this today and he is right in saying that end users wanting to
> know the future of Plone will look at the roadmap on plone.org and
> they will not be impressed: h
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Hi.
Where and how to manage PLIP's is both a matter of a defined process
and some software supporting this process.
One of the main driving reasons to move all Plone Core development
related information into Trac, was to have one place to manage and get
an overview of a
Martin Aspeli
writes:
> Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>
> I wrote a big reply to Matt, and ditched it. +100 to everything you
> said. :)
One of these days I'm gonna have to disagree with Hanno and Martin just
cause I always agree with them, but not today. +100 also and seriously,
for all the exact r
