On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Hanno Schlichtingha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
Hi.
Where and how to manage PLIP's is both a matter of a defined process
and some software supporting this process.
One of the main driving reasons to move all Plone Core development
related information into Trac,
Hi all,
I'd like to open a public discussion on where tracs should be. As
some of you may know, I'm very much against the PLIPs-in-trac system
that has been implemented following out-of-band discussions last year.
I think we need to make a proper decision, I'm not sure how that will
I'm in agreement that the plone.org system is preferable; however I
think it's probably a little late to change this. It does seem like
the PLIPs submitted so far are mostly unstructured feature requests.
Even the better ones are pretty minimal.
Alec
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Matthew
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:48:24PM +0100, Matthew Wilkes wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to open a public discussion on where tracs should be. As some
of you may know, I'm very much against the PLIPs-in-trac system that has
been implemented following out-of-band discussions last year.
I think we
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 2:03 AM, Maurits van Reesmaur...@vanrees.org wrote:
I do not really mind either way. But I talked with Jean-Paul Ladage
about this today and he is right in saying that end users wanting to
know the future of Plone will look at the roadmap on plone.org and
they will not
