On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:08:11 +0100, whit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Helge Tesdal wrote:
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 18:18:20 +0100, whit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My personal feeling(somewhat reinforced by what I saw at the symposium)
is that our ui layer is on a crash course with it's self. At bes
Helge Tesdal wrote:
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 18:18:20 +0100, whit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My personal feeling(somewhat reinforced by what I saw at the symposium)
is that our ui layer is on a crash course with it's self. At best, this
offers an opportunity to rethink how we want to work with UI a
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 18:18:20 +0100, whit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My personal feeling(somewhat reinforced by what I saw at the symposium)
is that our ui layer is on a crash course with it's self. At best, this
offers an opportunity to rethink how we want to work with UI as
developers, designe
On Monday 13 March 2006 09:18, whit wrote:
> just to piggy back a bit on this:
>
> I think one consideration that needs to be made is how much you guys
> want to start pursuing new style development. By the time Plone 3
> ships, CMF 2.0 will have full customization of views(the technology is
> not
