Re: [Framework-Team] Draft Call for Team Membership Applications

2008-11-05 Thread Andreas Zeidler

On Nov 1, 2008, at 11:48 PM, David Glick wrote:
Nomination doesn't have to be formalized.  If you have people in  
mind, why not contact them directly and encourage them to submit a  
self-nomination?  Then a shy person would know that they are  
welcome, but would still have to demonstrate some initiative.


so david, please feel very welcome and demonstrate that initiative! ;)


andi

--
zeidler it consulting - http://zitc.de/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
friedelstraße 31 - 12047 berlin - telefon +49 30 25563779
pgp key at http://zitc.de/pgp - http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net/
plone 3.1.6 released! -- http://plone.org/products/plone/



PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team


Re: [Framework-Team] Draft Call for Team Membership Applications

2008-11-05 Thread Andreas Zeidler

On Nov 2, 2008, at 12:14 AM, Martijn Pieters wrote:
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 23:48, David Glick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
wrote:
Nomination doesn't have to be formalized.  If you have people in  
mind, why
not contact them directly and encourage them to submit a self- 
nomination?
Then a shy person would know that they are welcome, but would still  
have to

demonstrate some initiative.


I am speaking from personal experience here; Geir Bækholt nominated
me; I would not have come forward myself, I don't think. Perhaps if
encouraged, but that's a toss-up, I think.


just for the record:  same here.


andi

--
zeidler it consulting - http://zitc.de/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
friedelstraße 31 - 12047 berlin - telefon +49 30 25563779
pgp key at http://zitc.de/pgp - http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net/
plone 3.1.6 released! -- http://plone.org/products/plone/



PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team


Re: [Framework-Team] Draft Call for Team Membership Applications

2008-11-05 Thread Andreas Zeidler

On Nov 4, 2008, at 5:16 PM, Steve McMahon wrote:

It's off. I've posted to Plone.Org news plus the developers,
product-developers, users and doc-team lists.


i'm catching up with fwt mail a bit too late, but big thanks again,  
steve!  the final version does sound very smooth indeed...  nice  
work! :)



andi

--
zeidler it consulting - http://zitc.de/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
friedelstraße 31 - 12047 berlin - telefon +49 30 25563779
pgp key at http://zitc.de/pgp - http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net/
plone 3.1.6 released! -- http://plone.org/products/plone/



PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team


Re: [Framework-Team] Draft Call for Team Membership Applications

2008-11-04 Thread Steve McMahon
It's off. I've posted to Plone.Org news plus the developers,
product-developers, users and doc-team lists.

On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Tom Lazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 02.11.2008, at 12:17, Martijn Pieters wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 00:31, Steve McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Got it. How's this?
>>
>> +1 from me :-)
>
> me, too. the new version does sound a bit more inviting than the old one,
> good feedback, martijn!
>
> cheers,
>
> tom
>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Martijn Pieters
>>
>> ___
>> Framework-Team mailing list
>> Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
>> http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
>>
>
>



-- 

Steve McMahon
Reid-McMahon, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team


Re: [Framework-Team] Draft Call for Team Membership Applications

2008-11-04 Thread Tom Lazar

On 02.11.2008, at 12:17, Martijn Pieters wrote:


On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 00:31, Steve McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Got it. How's this?


+1 from me :-)


me, too. the new version does sound a bit more inviting than the old  
one, good feedback, martijn!


cheers,

tom




--
Martijn Pieters

___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team




___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team


Re: [Framework-Team] Draft Call for Team Membership Applications

2008-11-02 Thread Martijn Pieters
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 00:31, Steve McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Got it. How's this?

+1 from me :-)

-- 
Martijn Pieters

___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team


Re: [Framework-Team] Draft Call for Team Membership Applications

2008-11-01 Thread Steve McMahon
Got it. How's this?

DRAFT Call for Plone 4.x Framework Team Members

Would you like to help choose what goes into Plone 4?

The Plone Framework team is now receiving applications and nominations
for membership in the Plone 4 Framework Team.

The Framework Team will be responsible for evaluating PLone
Improvement Proposals (PLIPS) and implementations for Plone 4.x. The
team also nominates the release manager to the Plone Foundation Board,
which does the hiring. PLIP evaluation consists of considering the
benefits and risks associated with a PLIP and casting a reasoned and
explained +/- 1 vote on each proposal. Framework Team members also
follow PLIP implementation, and make acceptance recommendations to the
Release Manager.

Qualifications include:

* An awareness of community strategic discussions about Plone's development;
* Ability to make a long-term committment. Plone 4 will take some
time, and the team will stay together to work on the entire 4.x
series.
* A good understanding of Plone's architecture and UI: enough to
weigh risks and benefits;
* Time to keep up with discussions on the Framework Team mailing lists;
* The ability to occasionally budget a significant amount of time
for evaluating PLIPs or implementations in detail as deadlines
approach;
* The ability to work with SVN well enough to test PLIP
integration and implementation for final evaluation;
* The personality to get along well in a flexible, give-and-take
group process and to accept and support group decisions.

New Framework Team members will be chosen by existing Framework Team
members and involved FWT alumni. Considerations will include many
criteria beyond the simply technical. The new team must be balanced in
skills and likely to work well together.

Please note something new: the Plone 3.x Framework Team will continue
to work on enhancing Plone 3.x during the development of Plone 4 and
possibly afterwards.

If you're interested or would like to nominate someone, please send an
introductory note, explaining you or your nominee's interest and
qualifications, to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Postings from
non-subscribers are rejected, so if you're not a subscriber, send your
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a request for forwarding.



On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Martijn Pieters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 23:48, David Glick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Nomination doesn't have to be formalized.  If you have people in mind, why
>> not contact them directly and encourage them to submit a self-nomination?
>>  Then a shy person would know that they are welcome, but would still have to
>> demonstrate some initiative.
>
> I am speaking from personal experience here; Geir Bækholt nominated
> me; I would not have come forward myself, I don't think. Perhaps if
> encouraged, but that's a toss-up, I think.
>
> I am not asking for a formal nomination process, I am asking for some
> reworking the text a little to also encouraging informal nominations.
> I agree that to require someone to officially second or endorse you is
> too much overhead.
>
> --
> Martijn Pieters
>
> ___
> Framework-Team mailing list
> Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
> http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
>
>



-- 

Steve McMahon
Reid-McMahon, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team


Re: [Framework-Team] Draft Call for Team Membership Applications

2008-11-01 Thread Martijn Pieters
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 23:48, David Glick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nomination doesn't have to be formalized.  If you have people in mind, why
> not contact them directly and encourage them to submit a self-nomination?
>  Then a shy person would know that they are welcome, but would still have to
> demonstrate some initiative.

I am speaking from personal experience here; Geir Bækholt nominated
me; I would not have come forward myself, I don't think. Perhaps if
encouraged, but that's a toss-up, I think.

I am not asking for a formal nomination process, I am asking for some
reworking the text a little to also encouraging informal nominations.
I agree that to require someone to officially second or endorse you is
too much overhead.

-- 
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team


Re: [Framework-Team] Draft Call for Team Membership Applications

2008-11-01 Thread David Glick


On Nov 1, 2008, at 3:29 PM, Martijn Pieters wrote:

On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 22:37, Steve McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Martijn Pieters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
wrote:

I'd like to see people nominated as well; perhaps candidates need to
have someone second them? Not sure what standing we'd expect from  
the

nominator.


Do you think you'll get a lot of candidates? If not, I'd say keep the
process low-overhead and just take self-nominations.


Okay; I guess we review the candidates anyway. I am just concerned
that suitable candidates may be shy to step up themselves; it can take
some guts to step up to the plate and say "I want to help decide what
the future of Plone is going to be like". Nominating should be an
option too, something like "if you know someone you think is perfect
for the job, let us know".



Nomination doesn't have to be formalized.  If you have people in mind,  
why not contact them directly and encourage them to submit a self- 
nomination?  Then a shy person would know that they are welcome, but  
would still have to demonstrate some initiative.


David Glick
Web Developer
ONE/Northwest

New tools and strategies for engaging people in protecting the  
environment


http://www.onenw.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
work: (206) 286-1235 x32
mobile: (206) 679-3833

Subscribe to ONEList, our email newsletter!
Practical advice for effective online engagement
http://www.onenw.org/full_signup





___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team


Re: [Framework-Team] Draft Call for Team Membership Applications

2008-11-01 Thread Martijn Pieters
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 22:37, Steve McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Martijn Pieters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'd like to see people nominated as well; perhaps candidates need to
>> have someone second them? Not sure what standing we'd expect from the
>> nominator.
>
> Do you think you'll get a lot of candidates? If not, I'd say keep the
> process low-overhead and just take self-nominations.

Okay; I guess we review the candidates anyway. I am just concerned
that suitable candidates may be shy to step up themselves; it can take
some guts to step up to the plate and say "I want to help decide what
the future of Plone is going to be like". Nominating should be an
option too, something like "if you know someone you think is perfect
for the job, let us know".

-- 
Martijn Pieters

___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team


Re: [Framework-Team] Draft Call for Team Membership Applications

2008-11-01 Thread Steve McMahon
Do you think you'll get a lot of candidates? If not, I'd say keep the
process low-overhead and just take self-nominations.

Steve

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Martijn Pieters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 17:10, Steve McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Would you like to help choose what goes into Plone 4?
>>
>> The Plone Framework team is now receiving applications for membership in the
>> Plone 4 Framework Team.
> ...
>
>> If you're interested, please send an introductory note, explaining your
>> interest and qualifications, to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Postings
>> from non-subscribers are rejected, so if you're not a subscriber, send your
>> message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a request for forwarding.
>
> I'd like to see people nominated as well; perhaps candidates need to
> have someone second them? Not sure what standing we'd expect from the
> nominator.
>
> --
> Martijn Pieters
>



-- 

Steve McMahon
Reid-McMahon, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team


Re: [Framework-Team] Draft Call for Team Membership Applications

2008-10-31 Thread Martijn Pieters
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 17:10, Steve McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would you like to help choose what goes into Plone 4?
>
> The Plone Framework team is now receiving applications for membership in the
> Plone 4 Framework Team.
...

> If you're interested, please send an introductory note, explaining your
> interest and qualifications, to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Postings
> from non-subscribers are rejected, so if you're not a subscriber, send your
> message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a request for forwarding.

I'd like to see people nominated as well; perhaps candidates need to
have someone second them? Not sure what standing we'd expect from the
nominator.

-- 
Martijn Pieters

___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team


Re: [Framework-Team] Draft Call for Team Membership Applications

2008-10-29 Thread Tom Lazar

thanks for the draft, steve!

i wouldn't change anything, but unless my cold is still clogging up my  
brain too much, it doesn't seem to state the number of members the  
team will have, which might be worth mentioning to applicants.


so perhaps we could stick that in there somewhere?

cheers,

tom

On Oct 28, 2008, at 5:10 PM, Steve McMahon wrote:


DRAFT Call for Plone 4.x Framework Team Members

Would you like to help choose what goes into Plone 4?

The Plone Framework team is now receiving applications for  
membership in the Plone 4 Framework Team.


The Framework Team will be responsible for evaluating the PLone  
Improvement Proposals (PLIPS) for Plone 4.x. The team also nominates  
the release manager to the Plone Foundation Board, which does the  
hiring. PLIP evaluation consists of considering the benefits and  
risks associated with a PLIP and casting a reasoned and explained  
+/- 1 vote on each proposal. Framework Team members also follow PLIP  
implementation, and make recommendations to the Release Manager.


Qualifications include:
	• An awareness of community strategic discussions about Plone's  
development;
	• Ability to make a long-term committment. Plone 4 will take some  
time, and the team will stay together to work on the entire 4.x  
series.
	• A good understanding of Plone's architecture and UI: enough to  
weigh risks and benefits;
	• Time to keep up with discussions on the Framework Team mailing  
lists;
	• The ability to occasionally budget a significant amount of time  
for evaluating PLIPs in detail as feature-lock deadlines approach;
	• The ability to work with SVN well enough to test PLIP integration  
and implementation for final evaluation;
	• The personality to get along well in a flexible, give-and-take  
group process and to accept and support group decisions.
New Framework Team members will be chosen by existing Framework Team  
members and involved FWT alumni. Considerations will include many  
criteria beyond the simply technical. The new team must be balanced  
in skills and likely to work well together.


Please note something new: the Plone 3.x Framework Team will  
continue to work on enhancing Plone 3.x during the development of  
Plone 4 and possibly afterwards.


If you're interested, please send an introductory note, explaining  
your interest and qualifications, to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
Postings from non-subscribers are rejected, so if you're not a  
subscriber, send your message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a request for  
forwarding.



___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team



___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team