Re: [Frameworks] super-8 to 16mm blow ups?

2013-12-09 Thread mike rice
As someone who has recently been an employee (contact and limited optical printer) at Colorlab, I can say that Super 8mm to 16mm are on the way out. IF they would agree to do it for you, it would unfortunately take a VERY long time for the project to be completed. I LOVE Colorlab for a lot of

Re: [Frameworks] Super 8 to 16mm Blow Up

2013-12-08 Thread Jack Rizzo
Hello Jerrett Here at Metropolis Post we can scan your Super 8 footage on a laser graphics Scan Station then record out to a 16mm Negative on our Laser Graphics Film Recorder, the results will be superior to doing it on any optical printer which usually yield very high contrast blown out

Re: [Frameworks] Super 8 to 16mm Blow Up

2013-12-08 Thread Scott Dorsey
On which subject, I have one of the 5/8 f/2.1 Bell and Howell lenses for the later BH projectors (500-series and on), for sale. I never liked the things, they are just not all that sharp, but if you're stuck with a short throw they do the job. --scott

Re: [Frameworks] super-8 to 16mm blow ups?

2013-12-07 Thread Jon Behrens
Hello Jerrett I personally think you'd be much better off to do it yourself on an optical printer. Or maybe find a friend who uses an optical printer that can do it for you. I think having a lab do it might end up turning out to be very expensive. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 6, 2013, at 7:59

Re: [Frameworks] super-8 to 16mm blow ups?

2013-12-07 Thread Jeff Kreines
You have to be careful. I have recently scanned S8 film that had been blown up on a JK printer, and there was severe perf damage that entered the image area. This was caused by a slightly misaligned JK projector head. These days I am not sure if 16mm blowups from S8 are the best way to go

Re: [Frameworks] super-8 to 16mm blow ups?

2013-12-07 Thread Jon Behrens
Good point Jeff Sent from my iPhone On Dec 7, 2013, at 10:41 AM, Jeff Kreines j...@kinetta.com wrote: You have to be careful. I have recently scanned S8 film that had been blown up on a JK printer, and there was severe perf damage that entered the image area. This was caused by a

Re: [Frameworks] super-8 to 16mm blow ups?

2013-12-07 Thread Roger Wilson
Hi Jarrett, I have completed numerous Super 8mm to 16mm blow ups using a JK printer in the past and have had great results. The main thing to take into consideration is the quality of the Super 8mm footage. Is it recently shot and processed film or is it older stock that has been sitting around

Re: [Frameworks] super-8 to 16mm blow ups?

2013-12-07 Thread Jarrett Hayman
Thanks all, that certainly gives me plenty to think about. I don't know where to find an optical printer. My primary motivation for doing blow-ups is the fact that super-8 reversal is getting harder to find, and I'd like to find a way to avoid shipping negatives to Andec in Germany to have prints

Re: [Frameworks] super-8 to 16mm blow ups?

2013-12-07 Thread Beebe, Roger
Just wanted to say RE: 35mm vs. 16mm, that Scott's sentiments seem to echo the traditional wisdom about the omnipresence of 35mm, but with the rapid scrapping of 35mm projectors from almost every multiplex (and most of the art houses) in the U.S., it seems the scales may be tipping back in the

Re: [Frameworks] super-8 to 16mm blow ups?

2013-12-07 Thread David Tetzlaff
Well, first, the only way the scales are tipping in any venue is toward digital projection. Setting up a 16mm micro-cinema requires finding a working projector that won't eat prints, finding the increasingly rare short and fast lenses that will fill a decent sized screen, and dealing with

Re: [Frameworks] Super 8 to 16mm

2012-09-09 Thread Pablo Marin
Thanks Bernd, i know Andec by its reputation. I'm in Buenos Aires, so it's the same if its in Europe or North America. best,p. --- On Sun, 9/9/12, Bernd Luetzeler fi...@gmx.de wrote: From: Bernd Luetzeler fi...@gmx.de Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Super 8 to 16mm To: Experimental Film Discussion