[Frameworks] From the industry:

2012-01-25 Thread Sandra Maliga


Subject: The transition is speeding up exponentially


http://www.studiodaily.com/blog/?p=8384


___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks


Re: [Frameworks] seeking double perf film

2012-01-25 Thread Myron Ort
Another thing that could be explored is multiple exposures advancing  
the film by one-half  (16mm) frame, eg. one double-8 sprocket hole at  
a time, then either splitting or not splitting.
I have to admit there are still techniques here which I never got  
around to exploring. There are actually quite a few combinations and  
permutations utilizing the Double8mm/16mm transconvertability.
I hate to see perfectly good weird techniques go unexplored and of  
course it has already been shown that every conceivable technique  
has its metaphorical analog right, I mean, if it is manifestable in  
the physical world it had its origin somewhere in the human brain.

It is the extension of BillyBitzerism to infinity.

Myron Ort



On Jan 25, 2012, at 12:05 AM, Sean Weitzel wrote:

I know this is getting off topic in terms of seeking double perf  
stock but I thought it would include well in this thread. My cousin  
taught me a neat effect easily achievable with R8 stock. Load your  
R8 camera and shoot the first half of a roll in ordinary fashion.  
Reload in preparation to shoot then 2nd half of the film but turn  
the camera upside down and shoot the 2nd half of the roll with the  
camera inverted. At this point you have two options, 1. take the  
roll out and have it processed but left unslit. Thread and project  
on a 16mm projector and you will see a grid of 4 frames two on the  
left are two adjacent frames of one scene and the two on the right  
are two adjacent frames of another scene.
The 2nd option would be to take this existing exposed unprocessed  
roll of R8 (now at the head of the roll) and load it into a 16mm  
camera. The resulting processed roll of film projected on a 16mm  
projector would yield a grid of 4 frames as described above with a  
full image covering all 4 frames double exposed on top of it. Very  
cool effect.


On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Myron Ort z...@sonic.net wrote:
There is double perf 16mm, and Double 8mm which is double perf 16
with an extra set of sprocket holes such that if split it becomes
Reg. 8mm.
Yes Double 8mm could be shot in a 16mm camera or in a Reg.8 mm camera.
Then it could be spit or not split, yielding several possible
special effects:


1. shot in Reg. 8 camera, not split= frame quarters seen, one side
upside down unless anticipated in shooting.
2. shot in 16mm, then split = flicker effect, alternate frame
quadrants.  See example below.
3. shot in 16mm camera, projected one sprocket displaced= half screen
effect, horizontal split, top and bottom of frame.
4. shot in 16mm camera, double exposed in 8mm camera, then split. Any
number of possible variations or possible multiple exposures with
this kind of thinking.
5. who knows what you might come up with.


Here is a film that was  double 8mm film stock shot in a 16mm camera,
meant to be used simply as 16mm, but I accidentally slit  it, so
there ended up two rolls (the two halves) of Reg. 8
with the flicker effect of alternating quadrants, then, after
telecine,  I juxtaposed the two halves side by side in chronological
shooting order  in fcp, yielding this double screen effect with the
rather mysterious
connections between the two halves. Note that one half of the split
double 8mm had to be telecined as A-wind, the other half B-wind in
order for this to properly work out.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=l4cNZLv5o9Mlist=UUhNv2f1M4EKeyTB68E_n5dgindex=8feature=plcp

Myron Ort







On Jan 23, 2012, at 4:03 PM, Steven Gladstone wrote:

 On 1/23/12 6:21 PM, Myron Ort wrote:
 double perf versus double 8mm

 I always thought you could shoot double 8mm in 16mm, and when it was
 processed you would just have an extra set of unused perfs (might  
be a
 problem with frame lines if you were off by a perf.) I never  
tried it,

 so I might be wrong, but I thought the perfs were the same size.

 On another note. I have a Redlake Hycam, and would really be  
happy if

 someone wanted to come take it off my hands. While I'd prefer a
 501C for
 tax purposes, in the end I'd like it to go to a good home that
 would use it.

 I'm located in Brooklyn, N.Y.


 --
 Steven Gladstone
 New York Based Cinematographer
 Gladstone films
 Blog - http://indiekicker.reelgrok.com/
 http://www.blakehousemovie.com
 http://www.gladstonefilms.com
 917-886-5858
 ___
 FrameWorks mailing list
 FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
 https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks


___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks


___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks


Re: [Frameworks] double perf stock needed (Ireland / UK)

2012-01-25 Thread ev petrol
hey Sarah
if you get stuck let me know, could probably source some for you here in NY
cheers Moira

 
www.moiratierney.net
www.soluscollective.org



 From: sarah browne sarahjbro...@yahoo.ie
To: Frameworks Postings frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com 
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 10:36 AM
Subject: [Frameworks] double perf stock needed (Ireland / UK)
 

Hi everyone,

Anyone have any leads for double perf stock in Ireland / UK?

Ardmore / Kodak, Fuji UK and filmclearance.co.uk have so far drawn a blank. 
Tips very welcome! 

Thanks

Sarah

www.sarahbrowne.info
 
___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks


Re: [Frameworks] Millennium Film Workshop Served with Papers from the Landlord

2012-01-25 Thread sef208
Good luck! Keep up the fight

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Jay Hudson jkh30...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi All:

 Just a late breaking development.  The Millennium has just gotten
 served with papers for their landlord fifteen minutes ago.  They are
 taking us to court to get us evicted.  Stay tuned for developments.
 There will be a full public meeting scheduled shortly.

 Jay
 ___
 FrameWorks mailing list
 FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
 https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks


Re: [Frameworks] Millennium Film Workshop Served with Papers from the Landlord

2012-01-25 Thread Jay Hudson
It is totally on right now.  This is the moment of truth for the
Millennium.  I am calling my friend who is an attorney to talk about
the situation, both internally and in connection with the current
service of papers.  Perhaps we could settle them down, but I do
believe that they have crossed the Rubican.  Going to court mean that
they want us out.

There is an intriguing possibility.  The building is not technically
owned by La Mama, but instead by 66-68 E 4th Street entity, which is a
nonprofit.  Two of the founding board members were Howard Guttenplan
and Jerry Tartaglia.  Howard signed the charter as in incorporator.
It was mentioned that they would change the board at the first meeting
so it is possible that everyone that wasn't with La Mama was removed
at the first meeting.  However, it is possible and I would say likely
that Howard is still on that board.

This entity was just created and left alone.  It never filed anything
after incorporation, never did notices or 990s to the IRS.  It lost
it's exempt status in 2010.  It is possible that the Millennium is a
member of the entity.  It could sue to remove the other board members
and basically take over the building.  Have to check with an attorney
on that one, but it could be a possibility.

Jay

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 8:17 PM, sef208 sef...@gmail.com wrote:
 Good luck! Keep up the fight

 On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Jay Hudson jkh30...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi All:

 Just a late breaking development.  The Millennium has just gotten
 served with papers for their landlord fifteen minutes ago.  They are
 taking us to court to get us evicted.  Stay tuned for developments.
 There will be a full public meeting scheduled shortly.

 Jay
 ___
 FrameWorks mailing list
 FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
 https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks



 ___
 FrameWorks mailing list
 FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
 https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks


Re: [Frameworks] From the industry:

2012-01-25 Thread Tim Halloran

Thanks for linking this.
 
I actually get sick thinking about a day when I won't be able to go see a real 
projected film print. There are already films that will likely never be seen 
again this way. As the author of the blog article laments, I too would have 
savored all of the great real film prints I've watched even more had I known 
that it was last time I was going to see them.
 
Tim
 



From: neor...@maliga.com
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:16:03 -0800
To: frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com
Subject: [Frameworks] From the industry:







Subject: The transition is speeding up exponentially




http://www.studiodaily.com/blog/?p=8384



___ FrameWorks mailing list 
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com 
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
   ___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks


Re: [Frameworks] Alchemy / James Whitney's Dwija (1973)

2012-01-25 Thread Richard Ashrowan
Many thanks to the list - I have had some very helpful and interesting 
suggestions, both on and off list, in terms of filmmakers who reference 
alchemical ideas, or who might be said to work in a consciously alchemical way 
with film - Christian Farrell / Silt, Sociedade Abissologica, Daniel Higgs 
'Alchemist', Werner Nekes, Jim Davis, Ken Paul Rosenthal.

I want to say also that May at the Academy has been very helpful in terms of 
organising a way of viewing James Whitney's Dwija. 

I am aware of William Moritz's writing on Dwija (thanks to CVM), also the 
discussion of Dwija in William Wees. If anyone knows of any other sources or 
commentaries I should know about in relation to this (or indeed his other 
'elemental' film - Wu Ming) , please do let me know.  

Thanks again to everyone for such helpfulness.

Richard

Richard Ashrowan
rich...@ashrowan.com
Web: www.ashrowan.com
Blog: http://richardashrowan.tumblr.com
Alchemy: www.alchemyfilmfestival.org.uk


















___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks