Check youtube-dl, an Open Source command line utility that is highly
versatile and configurable:
http://rg3.github.com/youtube-dl
If you want to download a whole batch of YouTube videos, write each URL as
one line of a plain text file 'videos.txt' and simply run, on the
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X command
This works, nothin' to it.
http://keepvid.com
owen
On Jan 2, 2012, at 9:26 PM, Jon Perez wrote:
> Here's two different ways that work every time:
>
> The first way sounds complicated but is very straightforward. If you're
> working on a mac install a utility called Perian. Open the video you wa
MIT's List Visual Arts Center recently held an exhibition of Otto Piene's work.
In conjunction there were numerous panels and screenings (though no Group Zero
public access episodes to my knowledge)
You might check the Nov. 17 listing on this calendar
http://listart.mit.edu/past_programs
J. Ketner
On Mac with Safari, I recently started using this:
http://www.verticalforest.com/2011/12/06/downloading-videos-with-
youtube5/
It seems to work very well, and despite what he says on the
website, I found it very easy to get the hang of.
Hope this helps:
Peter
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012, at 09:26 PM, Jon
Thanks everyone - I'm going with the mpeg streamclip method and its
working great
-LJ
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Jon Perez wrote:
> Here's two different ways that work every time:
>
> The first way sounds complicated but is very straightforward. If you're
> working on a mac install a utility
Hey all,
I have a 400' roll of 16mm Vision stock I need cut up and put on daylight
spools, any suggestions? Any kind souls with dark rooms and rewind cranks that
are willing to trade use of them for a six pack?
Alex
___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWo
Hey guys
does anyone have any good solutions for making photographic prints off 16mm
film? I talked to fotokep about it and it's kinda pricey. Any home-made
solutions? like a loupe on the lens of a 35mm still camera type of thing?
trying to avoid both optical printing and scanning digitally.
--
__
http://www.ebay.com/sch/?
_nkw=cinelarger&clk_rvr_id=304125622581&mfe=search
On Jan 3, 2012, at 10:02 AM, mariah garnett wrote:
> Hey guys
> does anyone have any good solutions for making photographic prints
> off 16mm film? I talked to fotokep about it and it's kinda pricey.
> Any home-mad
Mariah,
have you tried 35mm macro lens photography?
that way you could even take a quick picture and then crop the area you don't
want to print in the darkroom.
best wishes,pablo.
--- On Tue, 1/3/12, mariah garnett wrote:
From: mariah garnett
Subject: [Frameworks] 16mm stills in LA
To: framew
I was recently recanning a large amount of 16mm reversal original, and wanted
to capture frames just to get a sense of what was on each roll.
I had a cheap Panasonic Lumix camera with macro capability, and found that if
it was 32mm (two 16mm cores) from the film over a lightbox I could get
sur
I am looking to purchase two Bolex cameras in LA. Reflex would be best.
Anyone selling one or two? Where can I get these cameras in good working
order? Thanks!
Best,
Stephanie
Stephanie Hutin
Director of Production
Intercollegiate Media Studies
Pitzer College
1050 North
The Cinelarger and Duplikin are total pieces of junk. Don't waste your time.
On Jan 3, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Myron Ort wrote:
> http://www.ebay.com/sch/?
> _nkw=cinelarger&clk_rvr_id=304125622581&mfe=search
>
>
> On Jan 3, 2012, at 10:02 AM, mariah garnett wrote:
>
>> Hey guys
>> does anyone
Sorry for the repost, I forgot to change the subject line.
I am looking to purchase two Bolex cameras in LA. Reflex would be best.
Anyone selling one or two? Where can I get these cameras in good working
order? Thanks!
Best,
Stephanie
Stephanie Hutin
Director of Prod
Cinelarger For $20 (ebay # 160701580221) you get it onto 620 film,
of questionable quality, then you have to get that film processed
and printed.
Century Precision Optics also made their version which mounted onto
your 35mm camera. Some say this quality isn't tops either, but then
you
agreed.
unless fuzzy pictures work for you for some reason.
On Jan 3, 2012, at 10:14 AM, Jeff Kreines wrote:
> The Cinelarger and Duplikin are total pieces of junk. Don't waste
> your time.
>
>
>
> On Jan 3, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Myron Ort wrote:
>
>> http://www.ebay.com/sch/?
>> _nkw=cinelarger
Put your 16mm in the negative carrier of a photographic enlarger and mask
it as you like. Then you're ready to strike prints from it without any
digital intervention!
On Jan 3, 2012 1:20 PM, "Myron Ort" wrote:
> agreed.
> unless fuzzy pictures work for you for some reason.
>
>
> On Jan 3, 2012, a
If working with originals positive you'll have to contact print your results
On Jan 3, 2012 1:36 PM, "Philippe Leonard" wrote:
> Put your 16mm in the negative carrier of a photographic enlarger and mask
> it as you like. Then you're ready to strike prints from it without any
> digital interventio
thanks guys -
i think i was thinking of the century precision optics version of the
cinelarger.
i'd prefer to print directly off my neg but don't really have much
experience printing photos and i don't want to scratch my neg (not this one
at least and this is time sensitive). plus i have like a mil
David Bordwell has a simple but very effective setup for making stills from
prints with a 35mm camera, though I don't know its precise composition. He's
made an unreal amount of amazing looking stills over many many years, still
doing it in 35mm last I knew. Someone else on this list might kno
Hi!
I'm selling on on eBay right now.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/290652734318?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649
Daina Krumins
http://www.dainakrumins.com
--- On Tue, 1/3/12, Stephanie Hutin wrote:
From: Stephanie Hutin
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] 16mm stills in LA
To: "Expe
I used to put the 16mm film in an enlarger to make prints.
However, the quality is really not all that good because when film goes
through a projector the grain, which is different for each frame, kind of
vanishes because it's only on the screen for 1/2 of 1/24 of a second. The
viewers mind a
Recipes for Disaster had a good sounding solution - photo enlarger pointed
at a 35mm camera with its lens taken off, use the internal light meter to
judge the correct shutter speed.
I tried it on my DSLR and it looked pretty good.
Allie
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Daina Krumins wrote:
> Hi
Thanks Daina. Do I have to bid or is there a "buy it now" option?
Stephanie Hutin
Director of Production
Intercollegiate Media Studies
Pitzer College
1050 North Mills Ave
Claremont, CA 91711
909.607.3889
stephanie_hu...@pitzer.edu
On Jan 3, 2012, at 11:03 AM, Daina Krumins wr
Try PC Color Lab in Lil Tokyo:
http://www.pccolour.com/
Or the film cage at CalArts has a 35mm SLR with an adapted filter for
16mm...
___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
You have to bid. I had no idea what it's worth, so I just made it an auction.
Daina
--- On Tue, 1/3/12, Stephanie Hutin wrote:
From: Stephanie Hutin
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] 16mm stills in LA
To: "Experimental Film Discussion List"
Date: Tuesday, January 3, 2012, 2:24 PM
Thanks Daina. Do
Many are available on EBay. I have a non-reflex Bolex ( body only),
good condition, that I will sell you for $75. I am in LA.
-- Sandy Maliga
sa...@maliga.com
On Jan 3, 2012, at 10:15 AM, Stephanie Hutin wrote:
> Sorry for the repost, I forgot to change the subject line.
>
> I am looking to p
hi,
i've had some 16mm stills drum-scanned by a guy called nathan baker who was
in chicago, now ny. the drum scanner goes well beyond grain structure, deep
through your film at 7200+ dpi. it has an amazing softness, color space,
and of course resolution. i have never seen such good results from
cov
Hi, I love Digital Pickle in Pasadena, they do slide scanning at INSANE
resolutions, so they could do the 16mm frame and probably come up with
something printable at a larger size, barring that I have a black and white
enlarger in my darkroom (bathroom). If you grab some paper and developer
you're
me!
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Alex wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have a 400' roll of 16mm Vision stock I need cut up and put on daylight
> spools, any suggestions? Any kind souls with dark rooms and rewind cranks
> that are willing to trade use of them for a six pack?
>
> Alex
> ___
hello-
I would be glad to rewind.. how about for some of that vision stock?
soon
Bill Santen
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Colleen Kwok TungShuen wrote:
> me!
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Alex wrote:
>>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I have a 400' roll of 16mm Vision stock I need cut up and put o
Hello
My suggestion-
I use a slide duplicator lens. The lens is about 8 inches long and
screws into my slr camera. There is a slot for a slide/ I actually
have 16mm slide-holders (for 110 slides when presented in a 35mm slide
projector).
After selecting a 16mm frame- I hold it up to the sky an
Can you elaborate on this process with a DSLR? were you putting the the
16mm in the enlarger and focusing the image to the sensor? I'm intrigued...
-Carrie
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Alex McCarron wrote:
> Recipes for Disaster had a good sounding solution - photo enlarger pointed
> at a 35m
I do not have experience with a DSLR and slide duper- After some research-
a flatbed scanner seems to be the best choice for the digital route-
I have embraced the slide-duper technique as an alternative to digital-
and as an approach to enlarging 16mm stills in my darkroom.
Sales of silver or
Hi folks,
I've posted another video on You Tube at http://youtu.be/KQIDnSiZJaU
Gong Show with Clouds is the second piece in my
Improvisation/Construction series. These pieces combine video imagery
taken at a concert of improvised music. a live recording of the show,
and video from my library.
34 matches
Mail list logo
