Re: [Frameworks] Fundraising

2012-03-13 Thread Lilly Husbands
Hey Mariah, It's Lilly, from Brown. I meant to contact you a while back because my buddy Bradford (Nordeen) was screening one of your films (or promoting its screening, at least) through Dirty Looks, and I was stoked to see your name on the list. I'll make one of the DL screenings one of thes

Re: [Frameworks] Fundraising

2012-03-13 Thread Lilly Husbands
Sorry, everyone. I haven't gotten the hang of this list yet... On Mar 13, 2012, at 9:52 AM, Lilly Husbands wrote: > Hey Mariah, > > It's Lilly, from Brown. I meant to contact you a while back because my buddy > Bradford (Nordeen) was screening one of your films (or promoting its > screening,

[Frameworks] DEEP LEAP MICROCINEMA in NY Tomorrow / Deadlines Extended

2012-03-13 Thread Jesse Malmed
Friends- Tomorrow night we're showing some videos and films by Rick Silva, Roger Beebe, Laurel Degutis, Ben Russell, Leigh Brodie, Eric Fleischauer, Theo Darst, Evan Meaney, Clint Enns, Benjamin Schultz-Figueroa, Michael Hubbard, Lee Webster, Pete McPartlan and Jeff Guay that borrow, steal, remix

[Frameworks] FLAMINGO FILM FESTIVAL 2012 (Posting for FAU students.)

2012-03-13 Thread Shane Christian Eason
Greetings: I'm forwarding information for this year'sĀ Flamingo Film Festival: A Showcase of International Student Film and Video. The entry deadline is April 13, 2012 @ 6 p.m. It's open to all post secondary students in North America and abroad. All relevant information pertaining to the event,

[Frameworks] digital Bolex

2012-03-13 Thread Christian Bruno
Someone just sent this to me, and I was curious if anyone has seen it too.The Digital Bolex.www.kickstarter.com/projects/joedp/the-digital-bolex-the-1st-affordable-digital-cinem?ref=card and if anyone has some thoughts on it. bestChristian __

Re: [Frameworks] digital Bolex

2012-03-13 Thread ben . weinstein
ew -Original Message- From: Christian Bruno Sent: Mar 13, 2012 12:16 PM To: Frame works Subject: [Frameworks] digital Bolex Someone just sent this to me, and I was curious if anyone has seen it too. The Digital Bolex. www.kickstarter.com/projects/joedp/the-digital-bolex-the-1st-affordab

Re: [Frameworks] digital Bolex

2012-03-13 Thread Alistair Stray
Yeah, I saw this today as well. http://www.digitalbolex.com/ Thats a very, very impressive price for a 12bit 2K RAW recording camera, especially at 32 fps. Standard C-Mount for lenses as well as options for PL, EF and B4. Its a bit odd that the live video out is only B&W. I'll beleive it when

Re: [Frameworks] digital Bolex

2012-03-13 Thread Aaron F. Ross
Wow, that looks fantastic. Thanks for sharing. Aaron At 3/13/2012, you wrote: >Someone just sent this to me, and I was curious if anyone has seen it too. >The Digital Bolex. >www.kickstarter.com/projects/joedp/the-digital-bolex-the-1st-affordable-digital-cinem?ref=card > > > >and if anyone has

Re: [Frameworks] digital Bolex

2012-03-13 Thread Carrie Schreck
It's the file-handling that scares me, working with Indiecams a year ago that also produced DNGs was difficult to say the least. Looks like there's a proprietary software that transcodes but I'd be wary. The real question is not the ISO (SI-2Ks only have around 200 and they are fantastic cameras) i

Re: [Frameworks] digital Bolex

2012-03-13 Thread Alistair Stray
Yep thats true. The sensor is actually a CCD rather than a CMOS, so it will have a far better signal to noise ratio and a wider dynamic range. Also, CCD means no rolling shutter problems. Apparently that particular Kodak CCD gives 11 stops. The workflow will be as painful as any raw workflow rea

Re: [Frameworks] digital Bolex

2012-03-13 Thread Carrie Schreck
Hmm, rated 11 means actually 8 :D so we'll see. Love to get my hands on one of the first 100 and do some tests. Carrie On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Alistair Stray wrote: > Yep thats true. The sensor is actually a CCD rather than a CMOS, so it > will have a far better signal to noise ratio

Re: [Frameworks] digital Bolex

2012-03-13 Thread David Tetzlaff
This is bizarre. For $3300 you get an awkward, non-orientable b+w finder, and a silly faux crank mechanism and non-ergonomic handgrip to make it kinda resemble a Bolex? Since the sensor and the viewfinder are spec'ed at 4:3, why are the two output resolutions spec'ed at 16:9? Why don't they m

Re: [Frameworks] digital Bolex

2012-03-13 Thread Carrie Schreck
Well let me point out there's some copy on the site the indicates you may be able to use an SSD as the mag, in which case (as with the SI-2K with cinedecks) you should be able to get over a half-hour plus recording time. Carrie carrieschreck.com On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:24 PM, David Tetzlaff wro

Re: [Frameworks] digital Bolex

2012-03-13 Thread Alistair Stray
Well, yeah 10 bit 4:2:2 would be good enough really, but I'm guessing putting out 4:4:4 at 12 bit isn't actually something difficult/costly for this camera to do instead. The consumer DSLRs you mention mostly give you 8 bit 4:2:0 and that can fall apart in post if you're doing anything excessive

Re: [Frameworks] digital Bolex

2012-03-13 Thread Herb Theriault
Here's an interesting take on it, from Stu Maschwitz http://prolost.com/bolex Christian Bruno wrote: > >Someone just sent this to me, and I was curious if anyone has seen it too.The >Digital >Bolex.www.kickstarter.com/projects/joedp/the-digital-bolex-the-1st-affordable-digital-cinem?ref=c

Re: [Frameworks] digital Bolex

2012-03-13 Thread Ryder White
Can't wait until they come out with an S8 one, maybe a digi-Nizo? 8mm sensor! Comes with its own "classic cartridge design" removable media. Or maybe just a pistol grip and faux-chrome-and-leatherette housing for your iPhone so you can use that S8 instagram app without having to look like "that guy