Re: [Frameworks] Safelight Spec for Processing Kodak 7363

2013-01-02 Thread Cathy
Hi Roger Thanks for the reply, that's great I'm going to give it a go. I'm just testing some film shot in a pinhole camera so it would be good to see the exposure time needed. Thanks again. Cathy Sent from my iPhone On 31 Dec 2012, at 15:45, "Beebe, Roger" wrote: > I've used a red safeli

Re: [Frameworks] Safelight Spec for Processing Kodak 7363

2012-12-31 Thread Cathy
Brilliant thanks Scott, I'll check out the sodium light and give it a go. Thanks for responding so quickly. Sent from my iPhone On 31 Dec 2012, at 16:01, Scott Dorsey wrote: > A red light will work just fine, but it will be a whole lot harder to > see what you're doing with a #1 or #2 safelig

Re: [Frameworks] Safelight Spec for Processing Kodak 7363

2012-12-31 Thread Scott Dorsey
A red light will work just fine, but it will be a whole lot harder to see what you're doing with a #1 or #2 safelight filter, compared with an OC. What I would most recommend would be one of the sodium lights sold for B&W printing work. They are so bright you could read a book comfortably and wil

Re: [Frameworks] Safelight Spec for Processing Kodak 7363

2012-12-31 Thread Beebe, Roger
I've used a red safelight routinely. I've even just used a couple of red filters doubled over a desk lamp in a pinch. I noticed that when leaving the film exposed to red light for an extended time (like while setting up to do rayograms), there is a noticeable effect on the processed film, but