On 21/07/13 13:02, Ben Finney wrote:
I think that trademark has a significant benefit to society, which is to
limit the tendencies of vendors to misrepresent their modified works as
though being whatever the customer is looking for — even if that vendor
has made incompatible or undesirable
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 04:50:51PM +1000, Adrian Colomitchi wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Ben Finney
ben+freesoftw...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Adam Bolte abo...@systemsaviour.com
writes:
Once again, your definition conflicts with what the legal Free
Dictionary appears to
Adrian Colomitchi acolomit...@gmail.com
writes:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Ben Finney
ben+freesoftw...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Adam Bolte abo...@systemsaviour.com
writes:
Once again, your definition conflicts with what the legal Free
Dictionary appears to be (linked above). A
Glenn McIntosh neonsig...@memepress.org
writes:
Ben, I'd be interested in your (and others) opinion on the way Trisquel
have given guidelines for the use of their trademark
(http://trisquel.info/en/wiki/trademark-guidelines). Though I'm not sure
what the legal status of such guidelines are.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Ben Finney
ben+freesoftw...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Ben Finney ben+freesoftw...@benfinney.id.au
writes:
Rather, my point is that these categories are not exclusive. Works
commonly inhabit several of these categories simultaneously, and it's
clearly false
Adrian Colomitchi acolomit...@gmail.com
writes:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Ben Finney
ben+freesoftw...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
From that it follows that it's unjust to deny the freedoms that accrue
for functional use of a work, merely because the copyright holder
doesn't think it
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Ben Finney
ben+freesoftw...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Adrian Colomitchi acolomit...@gmail.com
writes:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Ben Finney
ben+freesoftw...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
From that it follows that it's unjust to deny the freedoms that
