On 08/03/17 12:23, Russell Coker wrote:
> This isn't really news. After Snowden's information this is something most
> people expected.
>
> https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/01/assange-man-in-the-news/512243/
>
> Also remember that Assange seems to be a Russian agent.
Hi
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/03/09/opinion/the-truth-about-the-wikileaks-cia-cache.html?smid=fb-nytimes=cur=http://m.facebook.com/
--
Sent from my Nexus 6P with K-9 Mail.
___
Free-software-melb mailing list
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 06:41:00PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> I agree that reducing the attack surface is good, but I doubt that dealing
> with BIOS bugs actually achieves that goal. To get to the BIOS an attacker
> has to either compromise the kernel/acpid or gain physical access to the
>
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 07:41:37 AM Jookia wrote:
> I don't plan to make my system resistant to a full-scale CIA attack, but I
> do like having a BIOS that isn't a complete and buggy operating system in
> itself. I think reducing the attack surface is always a worthy goal.
I agree that reducing the
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 05:12:18PM +1100, Glenn McIntosh wrote:
> You'll be pleased to see that selinux gets a few mentions in the CIA
> leaks :-), particularly in the Android context (eg that it prevents
> normal installation of their 'RoidRage' malware, and how they get around
> it).
>
> It is
On 08/03/17 14:14, Russell Coker wrote:
> True. I think I've done my share of work in securing Linux systems both
> directly through working on SE Linux and indirectly through finding bugs in
> various daemons and applications (often due to SE Linux policy revealing
> inappropriate things).
free-software-melb@lists.softwarefreedom.com.au
Cc: ja...@cleeland.org
Subject: Re: [free-software-melb] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: WIKILEAKS, Vault 7:
CIA Hacking Tools Revealed
On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 02:39:58 PM ja...@cleeland.org wrote:
> If the information is all that matters, wikileaks will rel
On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 01:46:00 PM Andri Effendi wrote:
> I think people who dismiss Assange or Snowden as "Russian Agent(s)" are
> bonkers and have been manipulated by the MSM.
I have never suggested that Snowden is a Russian agent. He merely resides in
Russia, there is no evidence of him favoring
On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 01:12:16 PM Adrian Colomitchi wrote:
> > Also remember that Assange seems to be a Russian agent.
>
> Oh, really?
Yes, anyone who claims that Russia has an open government is on the Russian
side. For all the flaws of the US government it doesn't openly kill
journalists that
> This isn't really news.
From the two messages: "Security by obscurity in these areas" vs "Assange
is ..." - which one would you consider relevant for you?
The very page linked in the original poster:
"The CIA made these systems unclassified.
Why the CIA chose to make its cyberarsenal
This isn't really news. After Snowden's information this is something most
people expected.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/01/assange-man-in-the-news/512243/
Also remember that Assange seems to be a Russian agent.
--
Sent from my Nexus 6P with K-9 Mail.
11 matches
Mail list logo
