[ Is the #freeamp hidden? It was not on the list, but I could join
it... ]
Theme for this whole thread of discussion:
[chrisk@kuklewicz ~/www]$ fortune
Nothing endures but change.
-- Heraclitus
An update on my progress,
Yesterday I replaced how metadata is stored internally
So I am interested in hearing how much memory savings we are seeing from all this. Can
you run freeamp on your machine pre-patch and post-patch with the same
playlists, etc. and let us know the memory footprints?
elrod
Chris Kuklewicz wrote:
[ Is the #freeamp hidden? It was not on the list,
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 08:13:08AM -0700, Mark B. Elrod wrote:
So I am interested in hearing how much memory savings we are seeing
from all this. Can you run freeamp on your machine pre-patch and
post-patch with the same playlists, etc. and let us know the memory
footprints? elrod
Patience.
I couldn't help but notice that there is not much support for searching a
playlist. I've seen the proposals for regexp-based searching and having a
dialog of search results, but that method does not work well for the
text-based interfaces. I was wondering if it would be appropriate to add a
Um. That's the desired behaviour, else there's going to be a mem leak. the
'meta' in this instance is a local variable -- why set it to null when the
function returns a line later? If you're having problems with this, I'd say
it's because you changed the MetaData class so that it needs an
I have the current stable version of freeamp, 2.0.8, and I
think the program rules! No really, it is way better than
winamp, I am very impressed. I think you need to improve
your "marketing" though, since I just heard about it
recently from a slashdot post and would have used it a long
time ago
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 11:45:12PM -0400, Isaac Richards wrote:
Um. That's the desired behaviour, else there's going to be a mem leak. the
'meta' in this instance is a local variable -- why set it to null when the
function returns a line later? If you're having problems with this, I'd say
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 09:18:40PM -0700, gunnm wrote:
I have the current stable version of freeamp, 2.0.8, and I
think the program rules! No really, it is way better than
winamp, I am very impressed. I think you need to improve
your "marketing" though, since I just heard about it
recently
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 12:22:06AM -0400, Chris Kuklewicz wrote:
Freeamp is playing right now...But opening the music browser causes a segfault.
Ah..found the cause...compiling...
Ah..the music plays, as before.
Ah...now the music browser comes up without segfaulting.
The tree looks good
On 27-Sep-2000 Chris Kuklewicz wrote:
I'll ask for a second opinion: when a pointer is passed as the string
data for a column of the clist widget, what memory management is
required? I am assuming it keeps the pointer, and you are not
supposed to alter the string it points to. Metadata
10 matches
Mail list logo
