On 28 Feb, Valters Vingolds wrote:
> hmm, it's nice to see how freeamp gets accepted more and more!
>
> however, what do you say about that coca cola theme 'licence agreement'?
> 1) they are referring to .fat as "mp3 skin" ... huh?!
> 2) forbiding to "reverse assemble, reverse compile and otherwi
hmm, it's nice to see how freeamp gets accepted more and more!
however, what do you say about that coca cola theme 'licence agreement'?
1) they are referring to .fat as "mp3 skin" ... huh?!
2) forbiding to "reverse assemble, reverse compile and otherwise attempt to
create source code" - that incl
