On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 25/08/2012 13:52 Vitaly Magerya said the following:
On 08/07/2012, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
I would like to propose the following change for review and testing:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 05/09/2012 18:17 Kevin Oberman said the following:
Thanks so much! This should finally make Cx states work on my
ThinkPad! I really appreciate it. Guess it's time to do my weekly
upgrade of this system.
I haven't sneaked
on 05/09/2012 19:23 Kevin Oberman said the following:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 05/09/2012 18:17 Kevin Oberman said the following:
Thanks so much! This should finally make Cx states work on my
ThinkPad! I really appreciate it. Guess it's time to do
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 05/09/2012 19:23 Kevin Oberman said the following:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 05/09/2012 18:17 Kevin Oberman said the following:
Thanks so much! This should finally make Cx
on 05/09/2012 20:41 Kevin Oberman said the following:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 05/09/2012 19:23 Kevin Oberman said the following:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 05/09/2012 18:17 Kevin Oberman said the
on 10/07/2012 18:49 Sean Bruno said the following:
On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 03:22 -0700, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I would like to propose the following change for review and testing:
http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/acpi_cpu_cx_lowest.diff
Very nice. After a review I went ahead and applied it for
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 09:31:26 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 07:27 -0700, Ian Smith wrote:
I wonder if that explains why setting C3 on aforesaid T23 has no
effect
(in terms of dev.cpu.0.cx_usage indicating any time spent in C3)
unless
the machine happened to be
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 13:22:49 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I would like to propose the following change for review and testing:
http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/acpi_cpu_cx_lowest.diff
The idea is to separate effective cx_lowest (the limit that the idling code
should not currently exceed)
On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 03:22 -0700, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I would like to propose the following change for review and testing:
http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/acpi_cpu_cx_lowest.diff
Very nice. After a review I went ahead and applied it for testing. All
seems to be well on battery and A/C on my
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 07:27 -0700, Ian Smith wrote:
I wonder if that explains why setting C3 on aforesaid T23 has no
effect
(in terms of dev.cpu.0.cx_usage indicating any time spent in C3)
unless
the machine happened to be booted up on battery, in which case C3 is
shown as working
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
I would like to propose the following change for review and testing:
http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/acpi_cpu_cx_lowest.diff
It seems good to me.
--
Gianni
___
11 matches
Mail list logo