Julian H. Stacey said:
>> FreeBSD.org describes advocacy@ as:
>> "Furthering the Use of FreeBSD
>> Share ideas and plan to increase the number of companies and
>> individuals using FreeBSD".
>
> Fine
>
>> The original poster had an idea that he thought could increase the
>> number of FreeBSD users,
"Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Clearly, improving the website or writing new documentation does not
> qualify in your eyes, so Im kind of curious on exactly how you define
> advocacy?
Discussions about the web site belong on freebsd-www; discussions
about documentation (n
"Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg" wrote:
> Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> >>I feel the handbook could be made clearer in some areas, but I
> >>believe it is good in general.
> >
> >
> > ( This Not directed at sender above, so sender's name omitted, but the above
> > is a mild example of much worse noise fr
Julian H. Stacey wrote:
I feel the handbook could be made clearer in some areas, but I
believe it is good in general.
( This Not directed at sender above, so sender's name omitted, but the above
is a mild example of much worse noise from other hollow vessels on this list.
If it doesn't hel
> Hi Julian,
Hi Carsten
>
> I wouldn't agree. When you consider the sheer amount of unresolved PRs, I
> have a problem with adding another one to that list.
Yes, worrying, but a seperate problem.
I suggested send-pr also for the Method:
Regular cross posters of hot air on advocacy@ seem proba
Hi Julian,
I wouldn't agree. When you consider the sheer amount of unresolved PRs, I
have a problem with adding another one to that list. All the more when I
don't know that my PR is backed by a greater part of the community. Only
the fact that I can handle send-pr and I find me somebody with
comm
