Unless things have changed a lot, bde counts 50x most people. This
isn't a democracy.
It may not be a democracy, but it's also not a monarchy. :-)
If recent core events have taught us anything at all, it's that nobody
in core escapes being accountable to the developers at large and if
the
In message 6892.917596...@zippy.cdrom.com, Jordan K. Hubbard writes:
style(9) is not KNF, and never was intended to be. It's a FreeBSD style
guide that bears similarity to KNF because that's what it used as a
starting point.
I think we can safely presume that Bruce has been overruled on this
We spend so much of our time looking up our own collective asses searching
for the meaning of life that it is no wonder FreeBSD doesn't feel like it
has a clear direction for the future. All people seem to want to do is
stomp on others who try to contribute something.
I think the amount of
Matthew Dillon dil...@apollo.backplane.com wrote:
:Judicious use of inline functions (and macros) should help move
:code to the left - and may even make it more understandable.
More then judicious use -- inlines are an incredible advantage. Most
people don't realize that GCC will
KNF is propogating what I consider to be bad practice, and that annoys me.
I'm happy to say that often they should be dropped, but to FORCE the
dropping of braces etc. with no regard to readbility is too much.
I wasn't aware that KNF or style(9) actually forced anything so much
as suggested it
On Fri, 29 Jan 1999 00:55:21 EST, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Everybody's goal is to keep/make code readable (accusations of trying
to obfuscate are silly). You, people, are just not agreeing what
readable means. Hoping to aid in the ending of this thread(s),
Thank you very much. This is
not-so-loudly agree. Ask yourself: in the last 6 months, how many
things have been shot down and what has survived? From my point
of view, not much progress has been achieved. As far as I can see,
FreeBSD has reached critical mass and for each new developer coming
on board, one drops off or
Given that there is a good potential to introduce bugs, the age old
have another committer review it would likely allay many of the
fears that have been expressed. In the past that has been the MO for
this group.
Are you volunteering to review Matt's stuff? It's something I'm sure
he'd be
In message 7032.917598...@zippy.cdrom.com, Jordan K. Hubbard writes:
Many of us refuse to follow style(9), will NEVER follow style(9),
and to insist on it for others would be hypocritical at best. Bruce
is more of a microcosm and shouldn't be taken as indicative of general
trends. :)
... Unless
Hello,
as Matthew said in freebsd-current@ vfs_bio:getblk() still
needs work (B_CACHE/B_DELWRI stuff).
Running 3.0-stable (Jan 26) it still happens that some NFS
writes seem to remain uncommited on the server.
Is there a chance to get it into -stable before releasing
in mid February?
Thanks,
Unfortunately the AXP is still hosed :(
Hmmm. Let me look at this - I may have failed to adjust one of the
constants for the AXP case.
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
: Given that there is a good potential to introduce bugs, the age old
: have another committer review it would likely allay many of the
: fears that have been expressed. In the past that has been the MO for
: this group.
:
:Are you volunteering to review Matt's stuff? It's something I'm sure
In message 88592.917598...@axl.noc.iafrica.com, Sheldon Hearn writes:
On Fri, 29 Jan 1999 00:55:21 EST, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Everybody's goal is to keep/make code readable (accusations of trying
to obfuscate are silly). You, people, are just not agreeing what
readable means. Hoping to aid
... Unless we're talking about modifications to existing files where
either style(9) or other systematic styles apply, in which case we
should all try to adapt our changes to that style to avoid babelized
codelayout.
Absolutely. I was talking only about my own code, and code which I
modify
:Are you volunteering to review Matt's stuff? It's something I'm sure
:he'd be more than happy to take you up on, Warner! :-) As usual, the
:amount of work which various folks would more than love to have
:reviewed outstrips the number of people willing to do such review work
:in any serious way.
On Fri, 29 Jan 1999 09:53:08 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
The parans have the same function as commas in most latin alphabet
based languages: to convey structure.
I think you've picked the wrong analogy. The rules of the language
dictate certain cases in which commas are required.
:Hello,
:
:as Matthew said in freebsd-current@ vfs_bio:getblk() still
:needs work (B_CACHE/B_DELWRI stuff).
:
:Running 3.0-stable (Jan 26) it still happens that some NFS
:writes seem to remain uncommited on the server.
:
:Is there a chance to get it into -stable before releasing
:in mid February?
:Hello,
:
:as Matthew said in freebsd-current@ vfs_bio:getblk() still
:needs work (B_CACHE/B_DELWRI stuff).
:
:Running 3.0-stable (Jan 26) it still happens that some NFS
:writes seem to remain uncommited on the server.
:
:Is there a chance to get it into -stable before releasing
:in mid February?
On Friday, 29 January 1999 at 10:27:00 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jan 1999 00:55:21 EST, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Everybody's goal is to keep/make code readable (accusations of trying
to obfuscate are silly). You, people, are just not agreeing what
readable means. Hoping to aid in
The parans have the same function as commas in most latin alphabet
based languages: to convey structure.
I think you've picked the wrong analogy. The rules of the language
dictate certain cases in which commas are required. Extraneous use of
commas decreases readability.
Wrong, there are 3
On Fri, 29 Jan 1999, Gary Palmer wrote:
John W. DeBoskey wrote in message ID
199901271433.jaa75...@bb01f39.unx.sas.com:
A note of thanks to Jordan and everyone else who's been working
on the new 4.0 code... We have our first complete processing of
cd /usr/src make world cd release
so far you are the first and only objector..
which makes you outnumbered by 10 to 1 on email counts..
I agree completely, saving a few bytes in the source code is not
worth the obfuscation that results, writing correct programs is hard
enough as it is, without having to suffer from
On Fri, 29 Jan 1999 20:01:23 +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
I can't imagine how unnecessary parens are going to improve
readability for anyone who knows his/her operator precedence.
What about the others?
I'd like to know that people who don't know operator precedence are
leaving the kernel
On Fri, 29 Jan 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jan 1999 20:01:23 +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
I can't imagine how unnecessary parens are going to improve
readability for anyone who knows his/her operator precedence.
What about the others?
I'd like to know that people who
Robert Nordier wrote:
The boot manager menu, for example
F1 FreeBSD
F2 UNIX
F5 Drive 1
Default: F1
Y'know, in my computer that F5 is Drive 0, and the system will not
boot unless I select it first. Selecting it, makes the OSes boot and
F5 disappear.
--
Daniel C.
It was my understanding that the kernel would continue to support
a.out, and I think that's important. If FreeBSD can support SCO,
Linux, Solaris, BSDI, NetBSD and OpenBSD, it seems important that it
should also contain support for FreeBSD, even old, obsolete versions.
May I assume that this is
+[ Doug Rabson ]-
| On Fri, 29 Jan 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
|
| The reason I'm interested in this (now tiresome) thread is that I'd much
| rather have to read
|
| /*
| * Bail out if the time left to next transaction is less than
|
I'm moving this to FreeBSD-arch, due to taking the discussion quite a
bit in that direction.
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 11:44:35AM -0800, Sean Eric Fagan wrote:
In article
29763.917434096.kithrup.freebsd.curr...@critter.freebsd.dk you
write:
The biggest impact of this is a new argument to the
*Yes, a.out execution support will be standard in FreeBSD for at least
* several more years. At some point it may become an option, but that's a
* long way off.
*The only thing people are talking about is support for building the
* system binaries in a.out. We're moving to ELF because
On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 12:05:04PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jan 1999 20:01:23 +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
I can't imagine how unnecessary parens are going to improve
readability for anyone who knows his/her operator precedence.
What about the others?
I'd like to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 29-Jan-99 Sheldon Hearn wrote:
When it comes to code, do you not agree that the trained eye knows which
operators to seek to first in an expression? I can't think of an analogy
in the English language, since one doesn't seek to commas, one simply
reads
Would it be possible to add an exponential delay when connecting fails for
either reason?
I just received my specified phone-bill. It filled 42 pages, with hundreds
of calls with a duration of 17 seconds. (Because my modem needs to be
software-reset; I have mentioned this before).
Each
+[ Julian Elischer ]-
| yeah but not a SINGLE person has said to not commit the patch to style(9)
| so I'm going to do it later tonight..
| (It doesn't make extra braces MANDATORY but it does ALLOW them.)
|
| julian
| (if this doesn't bring
On Fri, 29 Jan 1999, Brian Somers wrote:
[...]
But where do you draw the line in style(9) ? Dunno.
Err on the side of redundancy, which cam be mechanically removed if you
don't happen to like it.
--
Bob Bishop +44 118 977 4017
r...@gid.co.uk fax +44 118 989 4254
To
Sheldon Hearn wrote:
As far as I see it, there are a lot of people who are saying
I want to use parens to improve readability
when what they really mean is
I want to use parens to obviate the need to learn operator precedence.
I can't imagine how unnecessary parens are going to
Sheldon Hearn wrote:
I didn't have a problem reading the sentence, even though you left out
required commas. The only thing that caused a problem was your use of
split infinitive. ;-)
Split infinitive is a urban legend. It has *never* been outlawed in
the english language, except for some
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 04:10:26PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:In libc_r, I don't think the code in uthread_kern.c's
:_thread_kern_select() scales at all.
:
:As the number of network connections (TCP) to my application grows, I
:believe this routine takes longer and longer and my CPU goes
As for noise, there are situations where excess punctuation is just
noise, and there are situations that benefit from more than the bare
minumum of decorations. Anyone doing kernel programming ought to know
the difference.
And that is where we disagree. Style is religion, and one man's
Unless things have changed a lot, bde counts 50x most people. This
isn't a democracy.
It may not be a democracy, but it's also not a monarchy. :-)
...
Bruce only gets 50x the vote on occasion by generally being the only
one to comment at all.
Bruce should get 50X the vote since he's
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Nate Williams wrote:
Some people when confronted by people wanting to have extra braces
say change style(9).
Well, here is my change..
You can count my vote.
I would also add a paragraph like this:
If possible code should complile cleanly with
David O'Brien wrote:
Driver is readonly, specialy developed for freebsd,
supports most of NTFS's features.
Source is at http://iclub.nsu.ru/~semen/ntfs/
Sounds like a good idea. Do you have a reviewer?
I'm looking at it now for 4.0-C.
I'm quite sure it has already been corrected
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Mike Smith wrote:
Are there any disagrees with an idea to commit a NTFS
driver into current:
I can commit/maintain driver mentioned at
http://www.freebsd.org/projects/
Driver is readonly, specialy developed for freebsd,
supports most of NTFS's features.
In message 19990129103757.a...@nagual.pp.ruyou write:
I saw it several times with very recent -current
Is your machine getting a lot of incoming connections? I'd like to
try to replicate this. If it's a problem for you you can try
reverting rev 1.52 of /sys/kern/uipc_socket.c .
Thanks,
Bill
I seem to remember there once was a comment in a well-known body of code, which
went something like:
You are not supposed to understand this.
Brian Feldman_ __ ___ ___ ___
gr...@unixhelp.org _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \
In message 199901291121.vaa01...@zeus.theinternet.com.au Andrew Kenneth
Milton writes:
: The only arguments I've seen for less 'punctuation' are
:
: a) I don't need them
: b) I don't like what it looks like with them
: c) There might be bugs introduced due to parens.
:
: Well a and b are crap,
In message 199901291530.iaa06...@mt.sri.com Nate Williams writes:
: Bruce should get 50X the vote since he's the only one willing to enforce
: the rules. Without Bruce the code would become inconsistant. By
: over-ruling we are essentially
Essentially what?
I appreciate the work that bruce has
#define quoting(Satoshi Asami)
// That sounds fine. However, there are still people stuck with a.out
// libraries out there (netscape comes to mind). Is the 3.1R installer
// going to include a.out libraries as an option?
Please, please...
compat22 would be a historical name. :)
On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 08:22:38AM -0800, Bill Fenner wrote:
Is your machine getting a lot of incoming connections? I'd like to
Yes.
try to replicate this. If it's a problem for you you can try
reverting rev 1.52 of /sys/kern/uipc_socket.c .
Ok, I'll revert back for a while and wait for
On Fri, 29 Jan 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
When it comes to code, do you not agree that the trained eye knows which
operators to seek to first in an expression? I can't think of an analogy
in the English language, since one doesn't seek to commas, one simply
reads from left to right.
The
On Fri, 29 Jan 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
Giving folks the go-ahead to use parens as a form of documentation is
misguided and will end in tears. MHO.
Giving people the ability to quickly prove that the code matches the
comments when they're upto their behinds in alligators is not going to
Hi,
I am having a few problems with my v.small network.
I have 2 boxes both pc's, one running FreeBSD nearly current (Updated
begin Jan) and the other running 3.0 release.
Firstly I was able to telnet to 127.0.0.1 and log in as root, however
now even this seems to be causing problems the same
On Fri, 29 Jan 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
if ((a 0) (b 0))
Personally while I KNOW (after wasting a second thinking about it) that
the example below is the same as that above, I ALWAYS code as above.
It takes me about 1/5th the time to know what it means.
if (a 0 b 0)
If
Dear Tim,
Your problem with telnet session is very simple - by default FreeBSD
doesn't allow anybody to login as root through insecure connection (see
/etc/ttys). This can be changed by editing /etc/ttys to make Pseudo
terminals to be secure (hovewer it compromises the security, you need to
know
: If I were working on this code written by someone else it'd leave my
: editor looking like the top example, that's for sure. I think that
: How easy is it to edit a piece of code and still have it do what you
: expect is an important consideration, because people DO edit things.
Agreed.
: I
This code looks pretty bad, all right. It looks like it is O(N^2)
in PS_SELECT_WAIT(), especially if descriptors get randomly strewn
amoungst the threads. It also looks like it is regenerating the FDS
masks
on each call completely from scratch. It also looks
As Jordan K. Hubbard wrote...
Unfortunately the AXP is still hosed :(
Hmmm. Let me look at this - I may have failed to adjust one of the
constants for the AXP case.
Sidestepping a bit: will there be AXP specific CDROMs in the WC
CDROM distribution?
Wilko
_
[NOTE: this article has nothing technical, but since I assume most of
the developers are reading here, I'am posting this here.]
Tomorrow, I will celebrate my 1-year anniversary with FreeBSD.
When I started with fbsd, I wasn't exactly an Unix newbie. In fact, I
have been using Linux and
I should probably backport the getpbuf/relpbuf changes from -4.x to
-3.x so the drivers remain reasonably portable.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
dil...@backplane.com
:
:I'm
-Original Message-
From: Doug Rabson [mailto:d...@nlsystems.com]
Sent: 29 January 1999 10:49
To: Sheldon Hearn
Cc: Greg Lehey; curr...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: btokup().. patch to STYLE(9) (fwd)
On Fri, 29 Jan 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jan 1999 20:01:23 +1030,
-Original Message-
From: Julian Elischer [mailto:jul...@whistle.com]
Sent: 29 January 1999 17:48
To: Warner Losh
Cc: Andrew Kenneth Milton; curr...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: btokup().. patch to STYLE(9) (fwd)
On Fri, 29 Jan 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
if ((a 0) (b
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 08:01:33AM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
not speaking about vinum, but to me, the indentation of 8 char and
line length of 80 chars are almost mutually exclusive.
I've managed to do this for years without much problem. When it
is un-avoidable, you can always use a macro.
I hope I'm not just being really stupid, but I think there's a problem
somewhere. If it's a configuration error on my part, then I think I'd
better take a vacation, considering what my job is supposed to be.
Anyway, I have a machine that is exhibiting a weird network problem.
My guess is that
Can you run a tcpdump arp on the machine that is having the problem,
as well? This could help to determine if it's a driver problem (e.g.
if the replies don't show up) or an ARP problem (e.g. if the replies
do show up but arp doesn't use them).
Bill
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 02:52:07PM -0800, Bill Fenner wrote:
Can you run a tcpdump arp on the machine that is having the problem,
as well? This could help to determine if it's a driver problem (e.g.
if the replies don't show up) or an ARP problem (e.g. if the replies
do show up but arp
bde, I don't mind you removing c_caddr_t as long as you also fix the
warnings that it fixed, but it would have been appropriate to notify
me of what you were doing rather then slamming me in the CVS commit
comments. I find that sort of behavior to be highly inappropriate.
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Christopher
Masto had to walk into mine and say:
On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 02:52:07PM -0800, Bill Fenner wrote:
Can you run a tcpdump arp on the machine that is having the problem,
as well? This could help to determine if it's a driver
Big Clue. Run tcpdump -p and see if the problem doesn't go away.
(tcpdump puts the card in promiscuous mode, tcpdump -p does not).
Bill
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 06:02:16PM -0500, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jan 1999, Christopher Masto wrote:
I hope I'm not just being really stupid, but I think there's a problem
somewhere. If it's a configuration error on my part, then I think I'd
better take a vacation, considering
On Fri, 29 Jan 1999, Tim Preece wrote:
scratch2 login: LOGIN root REFUSED (NOROOT) from scratch1.netlink on TTY
ttyp0
As long as I can remember, root logins have always been refused over
network connections. If you want to login as root over a network (bad
habbit, but ok for your own, private
On Fri, 29 Jan 1999, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Your problem with telnet session is very simple - by default FreeBSD
doesn't allow anybody to login as root through insecure connection (see
/etc/ttys). This can be changed by editing /etc/ttys to make Pseudo
*doh* Yes, it's /etc/ttys *not*
On Friday, 29 January 1999 at 9:13:39 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
It would also be nice if somebody whould coerse ident to DTRT.
I've already mentioned that I have a version of indent with DABT.
Shall I polish it up a bit?
Greg
--
See complete headers for address, home page and phone
Christopher Masto writes:
Can you run a tcpdump arp on the machine that is having the problem,
as well? This could help to determine if it's a driver problem (e.g.
if the replies don't show up) or an ARP problem (e.g. if the replies
do show up but arp doesn't use them).
Good idea.
On Friday, 29 January 1999 at 11:02:48 -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
If I were working on this code written by someone else it'd leave my
editor looking like the top example, that's for sure. I think that
How easy is it to edit a piece of code and still have it do what you
expect is an important
On Friday, 29 January 1999 at 9:13:39 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
It would also be nice if somebody whould coerse ident to DTRT.
I've already mentioned that I have a version of indent with DABT.
Shall I polish it up a bit?
You've got my vote.
Greg
--
See complete headers for
Question: how many people still limit their editor windows to 80
characters?
Almost everyone in my group, since alot of development is done on
laptops with small screens, or done remotely.
Nate
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body
On Sat, 30 Jan 1999, Greg Lehey wrote:
of intelligibility. Consider one possible expansion
if (((allocationfail | (IGNOREFAILUREMASK (incount %
BLKSIZE))) ^ failures) != 0)
or
if (((allocationfail |
(IGNOREFAILUREMASK (incount %
: Question: how many people still limit their editor windows to 80
: characters?
:
:Almost everyone in my group, since alot of development is done on
:laptops with small screens, or done remotely.
:
:Nate
I do, because if use anything larger some lines will inevitably go
over and I'll get
I hope I'm not just being really stupid, but I think there's a problem
somewhere. If it's a configuration error on my part, then I think I'd
better take a vacation, considering what my job is supposed to be.
Anyway, I have a machine that is exhibiting a weird network problem.
My guess is
Question: how many people still limit their editor windows to 80
characters?
I do :-/ So that I don't write code 80 columns.
Greg
--
Brian br...@awfulhak.org br...@freebsd.org br...@openbsd.org
http://www.Awfulhak.org
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour !
To Unsubscribe: send
On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 06:28:46PM -0500, Bill Paul wrote:
Hmm. Running tcpdump seems to make the problem go away. The ARP
replies show up immediately appear in the table. Clue.
You should have tried that first.
I'm sorry. I ran tcpdump on a different host precisely because I
didn't
4.0-current of a few days ago.
rebuilt XFree and a bunch of other stuff
build emacs or emacs20
either runs fine in an x-term
either freezes when started with its own window
it puts up the window
paints the grey menu bar
freeze
emacs20 stack at freeze
#0 0x282c4824 in select ()
#1
On Sat, 30 Jan 1999 10:49:43 +1030, Greg Lehey g...@lemis.com said:
Question: how many people still limit their editor windows to 80
characters?
Probably almost anyone who uses the default settings.
Many people like to be able to see more than one thing on the desktop
at a time. Even with a
On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 11:02:48AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
Yes. I agree with that.
if (a | b c % d ^ e)
should have been written as:
if (((a | (b (c % d))) ^ e) != 0)
I don't know why I'm getting into this, but to prove the point that this
expression takes careful thought,
Sidestepping a bit: will there be AXP specific CDROMs in the WC
CDROM distribution?
Probably - it's just far too early to say.
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
In message 199901292317.paa84...@apollo.backplane.com Matthew Dillon writes:
: bde, I don't mind you removing c_caddr_t as long as you also fix the
: warnings that it fixed, but it would have been appropriate to notify
: me of what you were doing rather then slamming me in the CVS
It's also something that bde has slammed more than a few other people
on when they do such things [Commit messages are not for this
purpose!] so he of all people ought to know better (stern look at
Bruce for getting hypocritical in his old age :).
- Jordan
bde, I don't mind you removing
Matt, get over it. bde didn't slam *YOU* in the commit messages. You
were never mentioned personally. Also, taking your complaint to
-current is not proper proceedure for handling grievances.
While this is true, I think the overall point he made was reasonable
considering how often Bruce
In message 86708.917669...@zippy.cdrom.com Jordan K. Hubbard writes:
: While this is true, I think the overall point he made was reasonable
: considering how often Bruce has corrected others for needless
: commentary in the commit logs and I'd be happy to see everyone follow
: their own rules at
forum. If Matt wished to make this point, he should have done so in a
less inflamitory manner especially in such a public forum. That's
been a problem lately in this forum, and I cannot express easily in
words how strongly I object to it.
Fair enough - maybe everyone involved should just
I've just committed the FreeBSD svr4 emulator, which has been built
by adapting the stirling work of Christos Zoulas from the NetBSD project
to FreeBSD.
I hope I haven't left anything out or broken the world, but I'm sure
I'll hear about it if I have :-)
To use it:
1. Add pseudo-device
In message 199901300636.raa20...@atdot.dotat.org Mark Newton writes:
: It's early days yet, folks -- You'll probably have trouble getting 100%
: functionality out of most things (specifically, poll() on a socket doesn't
: look like it works at the moment, so Netscape doesn't work (among other
:
There have been changes to rc and rc.conf lately to autostart Vinum. But
on my system it does not auto load at start and I wind up manually loading
the module, reading the config and mounting the volume. Any help if
figuring out why this is not working would be appreciated.
rc.conf now sets a
Warner Losh wrote:
In message 199901300636.raa20...@atdot.dotat.org Mark Newton writes:
: It's early days yet, folks -- You'll probably have trouble getting 100%
: functionality out of most things (specifically, poll() on a socket doesn't
: look like it works at the moment, so Netscape
Looks like not. David O'Brien have just showed me points
to fix. May be he will be?
Willing to, but I am waiting until I can compile it and test it under
4.0-CURRENT. (esp. since that is where it will have to be added first)
--
-- David(obr...@nuxi.com -or- obr...@freebsd.org)
To
We currently have routines like fork1() and killpg1() in /sys/kern/*
to implement generic functionality for actions with more than one
front-end.
NetBSD has done something similar for signals, so that emulators
with non-BSD signal semantics can implement their way of doing things
as an
In message 19990129204521.a73...@znh.org Zach Heilig writes:
: On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 11:02:48AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
: Yes. I agree with that.
: if (a | b c % d ^ e)
: should have been written as:
: if (((a | (b (c % d))) ^ e) != 0)
:
: I don't know why I'm getting into
96 matches
Mail list logo
