Re: bmake/contrib framework for egcs

1999-03-13 Thread Vladimir Kushnir
Excellent, I'll have a free weekend then :-) BTW, do you plan to include egcs' g77 as well? On Sat, 13 Mar 1999, David O'Brien wrote: > Yes. What I was working on is newer than the CVS repository. I'm > chasing several issues & moving things around. I haven't been keeping > the CVSup'able tota

Re: HEADS UP: new loader.rc stuff

1999-03-13 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> This stuff oughta be somewhere, soonest. If it's not man page, at least > a temporary distillation of it in a file in sys/boot, to be tossed once > there's a man page. *chuckle* It's like taking candy from a baby, I tell you! I can't help but notice that Chuck is a committer, and under the ru

Re: bmake/contrib framework for egcs

1999-03-13 Thread David O'Brien
> gnu/lib/libstdc++/Makefile this part of CFLAGS shoild be > -I${EGCSDIR}/gcc/cp/inc rather than -I${EGCSDIR}/gcc/cp/inc/exception > (after all, ${EGCSDIR}/gcc/cp/inc/exception is a file). Yes. What I was working on is newer than the CVS repository. I'm chasing several issues & moving things ar

Re: HEADS UP: new loader.rc stuff

1999-03-13 Thread Chuck Robey
On Sun, 14 Mar 1999, Andrzej Bialecki wrote: > On Sat, 13 Mar 1999, Chuck Robey wrote: > > > > load kernel > > > load -t userconfig_script /kernel.config > > > > > > and then putting your pnp configuration line on /kernel.config (if > > > it is not there already). > > > > This is good info for

Diskless boot stopping at "NFS ROOT:..."

1999-03-13 Thread Nicholas Esborn
This is a problem I have had on two seperate systems, running 3.0-RELEASE and now 3.1-STABLE built about a week ago. The systems were brought up seperately. Unfortunately since this machine never comes up to any usable state, I don't have detailed logs of its boot output. I'll try to summarize:

Re: bmake/contrib framework for egcs

1999-03-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Mar 13, 1999 at 11:33:23PM +0200, Vladimir Kushnir wrote: > Hello, here's where cpp died. There's a small error in freebsd.h: ^ freebsd-elf.h > INCLUDE_DEFAULTS array d

Re: HEADS UP: new loader.rc stuff

1999-03-13 Thread Andrzej Bialecki
On Sat, 13 Mar 1999, Chuck Robey wrote: > > load kernel > > load -t userconfig_script /kernel.config > > > > and then putting your pnp configuration line on /kernel.config (if > > it is not there already). > > This is good info for current, right? And I don't need to worry about > "userconfig_s

Re: HEADS UP: new loader.rc stuff

1999-03-13 Thread Chuck Robey
On Sun, 14 Mar 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > If you are running -stable This is the -current list, and I'm running current. I don't have the file "userconfig_script" nor /kernel.config. , you'll be able to use it if you import > -current's sys/boot and sys/sys/linker.h, cd /sys/boot ; make de

Re: HEADS UP: new loader.rc stuff

1999-03-13 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Chuck Robey wrote: > > Daniel, I'm having a little trouble getting this to work. I don't see > any kind of example loader.conf, or loader.conf.local, I made the file > you asked, below (/boot/loader.rc) ... I didn't have a loader.conf, so > on boot, it issues me an error on that. I have a new p

Re: bmake/contrib framework for egcs

1999-03-13 Thread Alex Zepeda
On Sun, 14 Mar 1999, Vladimir Kushnir wrote: > Thanks, I'll try, but what I mean is egcs compiled binaries are bigger > even for C, not C++, and as if memory serves -Os is -O2 subset. So > probably I'll just have to accept this increase in binaries size :-(. Ah > well, it ain't all that muc

Re: bmake/contrib framework for egcs

1999-03-13 Thread Vladimir Kushnir
Thanks, I'll try, but what I mean is egcs compiled binaries are bigger even for C, not C++, and as if memory serves -Os is -O2 subset. So probably I'll just have to accept this increase in binaries size :-(. Ah well, it ain't all that much, anyway. Oh, incidentally, I forgot to add that (wh

Re: bmake/contrib framework for egcs

1999-03-13 Thread Alex Zepeda
On Sat, 13 Mar 1999, Vladimir Kushnir wrote: > BTW, binaries compiled with egcc are still larger than with stock gcc. Is > there a way to shrink them (beyond what's possible with -O optimisation)? Try -Os, -fno-exceptions* -fno-rtti* or any combo of the above. * Don't do this with libraries, j

Re: bmake/contrib framework for egcs

1999-03-13 Thread Vladimir Kushnir
Hello, here's where cpp died. There's a small error in freebsd.h: INCLUDE_DEFAULTS array defined in a wrong way (patch attached). Now cpp doesn't die anymore. There's an another problem, though. For somereason libgcc doesn't want to compile with base c++ (conflict in "new", it seems). It does compi

Re: HEADS UP: new loader.rc stuff

1999-03-13 Thread Chuck Robey
On Wed, 10 Mar 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > A new loader.rc mechanism has been introduced. Nothing has changed > with loader, mind you, and you can continue to use your current > loader.rc (if any) unchanged, but Jordan thinks it might be better > to install a loader.rc using the new mechanism

ERRATA NOTICE: FreeBSD 3.1-RELEASE

1999-03-13 Thread freebsd-errata-update
** ** THIS IS AN AUTOMATIC ERRATA UPDATE FOR FREEBSD 3.1-RELEASE ** ** You can retrieve the complete ERRATA from: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/3.1-RELEASE/ERRA

Re: pcic.c & {,un}register_pcic_intr declarations

1999-03-13 Thread Mark Murray
Mike Smith wrote: > > I have card* compiled in (perhaps I should have mentioned that?), and > > pcic* kldloaded. > > > > > This makes the pcic module useless, and, as I said, renders any > > > combination other than 100% static *broken*. > > > > Rubbish! Why is my system working? > > Because you