I just installed the latest 4.0 snap off of ftp2.freebsd.org. Didn't
install the DES libraries...
I get this when trying to run tcpdump on the system:
unstable# tcpdump
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libcrypto.so.1" not found
enjoy
--
Jason Garman
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Jason Garman wrote:
I just installed the latest 4.0 snap off of ftp2.freebsd.org. Didn't
install the DES libraries...
I get this when trying to run tcpdump on the system:
unstable# tcpdump
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libcrypto.so.1" not found
Hmm. I
IMO (and I suggested this the other day), we should make the crypto
collection mandatory, and have sysinstall ask a question about whether to
point the libcrypt symlinks at libscrypt or libdescrypt (libdescrypt is
I'm still waiting for your diffs which do this. :)
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe:
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Ron 'The InSaNe One' Rosson wrote:
I am running CURRENT as of last week. I seem to be only able to get my
sound to work when I use:
option PNPBIOS
device pcm0
Here is the dmesg output:
unknown9: ESS0009 at port 0x800-0x807 on isa0
sbc0: ESS ES1879 at
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
IMO (and I suggested this the other day), we should make the crypto
collection mandatory, and have sysinstall ask a question about whether to
point the libcrypt symlinks at libscrypt or libdescrypt (libdescrypt is
I'm still waiting for your
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Richard J Kuhns wrote:
But then I'm back to my original question/problem: how to get ssh to ask
for a password using ssh-askpass. I've looked through the code (a little);
how would you feel about a patch to openssh/readpass.c that caused it to
call ssh-askpass if there's
IMO (and I suggested this the other day), we should make the crypto
collection mandatory, and have sysinstall ask a question about whether to
point the libcrypt symlinks at libscrypt or libdescrypt (libdescrypt is
I'm still waiting for your diffs which do this. :)
Well yeah,
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, John Hay wrote:
Can't it be handled the same way init, ppp and a few others are? The
binary shipped in the bin distribution is compiled/linked without crypto,
but then a version compiled/linked with it is included in the crypto
distribution.
Hmm. I didn't know that -
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Hmm. I didn't know that - probably it could. The question is then whether
make release correctly compiles everything without libcrypto (the original
poster suggests not).
Looks like it needs the following patch:
Index:
It also needs DISTRIBUTION=crypto inside that .if so that it will end up
in the crypto distribution. And maybe the exists(../../../crypto should
be exists(${.CURDIR}/../../secure) like the ppp/Makefile?
Hmm. I didn't know that - probably it could. The question is then whether
make release
http://phk.freebsd.dk/misc/b_iocmd.patch
B_WRITE is bogusly defined as zero, which is a perfect candidate
for coding and logic mistakes, we saw the most recent victim of
this bogosity as recently as a few days ago.
This patch moves the "io-command" aspect of the b_flags into a new
Ron 'The InSaNe One' Rosson wrote:
I am running CURRENT as of last week. I seem to be only able to get my
sound to work when I use:
option PNPBIOS
device pcm0
Here is the dmesg output:
unknown9: ESS0009 at port 0x800-0x807 on isa0
sbc0: ESS ES1879 at port
Ok, being a newbie to FreeBSD, I'm trying to get my laptop (WinBook XL2)
sound working under -CURRENT. If someone could point me to the relavent
docs, I'd be happy Here is what I'm finding:
dmesg reports:
chip2: ESS Technology Maestro 2E Audio controller port 0xec00-0xecff irq 5 at
device
It is most ironic that of course you were the loudest supporter of
SOS when he ripped out all my code that did EXACTLY all this.
(I might add that this was done without any warning to me. The
The commit messages being my first notice).
It was fully working and quite a few people were running it
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
This patch is the first step towards the stackable BIO system as
sketched out on http://www.freebsd.org/~phk/Geom/
you don't mention how you plan to get around the problem that
arbitrarily stacking devices means arbitrarily allocating minor
numbers. I used devfs to
On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 05:51:17PM -0800, John Polstra wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 05:59:09AM +, Paul Richards wrote:
Are expressions like ((uid_t)0-1) portable/safe ? Maybe that's a better
way of
It seems Julian Elischer wrote:
It is most ironic that of course you were the loudest supporter of
SOS when he ripped out all my code that did EXACTLY all this.
(I might add that this was done without any warning to me. The
The commit messages being my first notice).
It was fully working
After discussion with Soren off list, I'm bringing this onlist :)
Machine:
K6/2-450 on Asus P5A with 128 Meg PC133 (runnin 100) ram, Western Digital
Caviar AC23400L 4.3 gig, Sony DDU220E dvd rom
OS:
FreeBSD 3.x-STABLE for much time, switch to 4.0-CURRENT ~month and a half
ago?, been updating
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000 10:22:08 +0900, Yoshinobu Inoue [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
echo 24.113.25.85 | sed -e s/"\."/" "/g | awk '{$5 = $1*256 + $2; $6 = $3*256 +
$4; printf "2002:%x:%x:\n", $5, $6}'
Or, without only one extra process:
myaddr=24.113.25.85
OIFS="$IFS"
IFS=".$IFS"
set $myaddr
Am I the only one who thinks that having a .sample file containing active
settings is a not so great ting ?
Why not simply rename it to pccard.conf, pccard.conf.default or
default/pccard.conf
---
Nicolai Petri
Software-developer
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Hello,
While trying to compile Scilab-2.5 (the math/Scilab port is outdated),
I found that the "configure" script, when instructed to use the
GNU Fortran compiler, searchs for "g77". Unfortunately, this compiler
is installed as /usr/bin/f77. The solution is simple: "ln f77 g77",
but I think that
This patch is the first step towards the stackable BIO system as
sketched out on http://www.freebsd.org/~phk/Geom/
Please test review.
There's no code to test- it's just a sketch. It's fine as a start, but it's
important that you clarify the role of node device drivers in informing the
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Nicolai Petri (ML) wrote:
Am I the only one who thinks that having a .sample file containing active
settings is a not so great ting ?
Why not simply rename it to pccard.conf, pccard.conf.default or
default/pccard.conf
I assumed that the .sample was to emphasize
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 05:51:17PM -0800, John Polstra wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 05:59:09AM +, Paul Richards wrote:
Are
Today I have been having problems with applications being unable to find
shared libraries at run time with LD_LIBRARY_PATH set correctly. If the
library is moved into a directory set at boot time with ldconfig (via rc),
it works fine. I have tried it with several different libraries (both C and
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would prefer standard maxof() and minof() interfaces that work on
any arithmetic type. These can almost be written in portable C, at
least in C89 where types are restricted to char, signed char, ...,
long double:
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Matthew Jacob wrote:
This patch is the first step towards the stackable BIO system as
sketched out on http://www.freebsd.org/~phk/Geom/
Please test review.
{ as Poul reminded me, I missed the header line that had the patch - sorry
about that }
To
I've got two HD's in my machine: one's an older one (WDMA2) and the other
one, my main one, is newer (UDMA33). With recent kernel builds, I've
noticed some strange problems with the older HD. When I try to to
something like fsck -y on the drive, fsck just hangs. Also, if I have
that drive
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Patrick Hartling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today I have been having problems with applications being unable to find
shared libraries at run time with LD_LIBRARY_PATH set correctly. If the
library is moved into a directory set at boot time with ldconfig (via rc),
It seems Donn Miller wrote:
I've got two HD's in my machine: one's an older one (WDMA2) and the other
one, my main one, is newer (UDMA33). With recent kernel builds, I've
noticed some strange problems with the older HD. When I try to to
something like fsck -y on the drive, fsck just hangs.
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Soren Schmidt wrote:
It seems Donn Miller wrote:
I'm trying to determine if it's because my drive is bad, or was there
something that was changed in the ATA driver that may be causing
this? Output of dmesg:
There was a window where the ata driver had a problem
Well yeah, that's fun to say, but my days have been literally completely
full with getting other things ready for 4.0.
And you think mine haven't been? :) My point is simply that I'm going
to need a lot more than rough suggestions at this point if people want
to help. I don't have time to go
I do follow current, but I must be blind if I missed it. What is the
latest date for 4.0R ? Will there be instead another Release Candidate and
more testing ?
---Mike
Mike Tancsa,
The tag was laid down earlier today. Here is what my current kernel
claims to be at the moment:
FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #31: Mon Mar 13 10:59:41 EST 2000
Actually, there might be a couple fixes slipped in between now and the
release, but 4.0R exists. You may cvsup with the tag RELENG_4 now if you
I have had these problems ever since upgrading to -current about a
month ago. The kernel very regularly spews out messages like:
Mar 13 14:23:39 gemini /kernel: calcru: negative time of -2663631 usec for pid 568
(sshd2)
or a message that "microuptime() went backwards'. I have noticed that
I have had these problems ever since upgrading to -current about a
month ago. The kernel very regularly spews out messages like:
Mar 13 14:23:39 gemini /kernel: calcru: negative time of -2663631 usec for pid 568
(sshd2)
or a message that "microuptime() went backwards'. I have noticed
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
You'd be right, if you were right. :-) Pccardd expects what you said,
but defaults/rc.conf configures it to read pccard.conf.sample. In other
words, what is used is the .sample file, *NOT* the customized version,
unless you change that in
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, David E. Cross wrote:
I have had these problems ever since upgrading to -current about a
month ago. The kernel very regularly spews out messages like:
Mar 13 14:23:39 gemini /kernel: calcru: negative time of -2663631 usec for pid 568
(sshd2)
I know you've probably
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000 02:13:30 GMT, Paul Richards wrote:
I guess my next question is, are there any objections to
#define UID_MAX ((uid_t)0-1)
If you decide to go the static macro definition (instead of Bruce's
maxof() / minof() idea), please consider using UID_T_{MAX,MIN} or, even
better,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], "David E. Cross" writes:
I have had these problems ever since upgrading to -current about a
month ago. The kernel very regularly spews out messages like:
Mar 13 14:23:39 gemini /kernel: calcru: negative time of -2663631 usec for pid 568
(sshd2)
Disable APM in
Unheedful of thy elder's warnings, Kelly Yancey wrote:
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Nicolai Petri (ML) wrote:
Am I the only one who thinks that having a .sample file containing active
settings is a not so great ting ?
Why not simply rename it to pccard.conf, pccard.conf.default or
I noted the tag on the kernel today was updated to 5.0-CURRENT... where
is 4.0-RELEASE?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 06:12:22PM +1100, John Birrell wrote:
I deleted the weak definitions in the _THREAD_SAFE PRSYSCALL in
lib/libc/i386/SYS.h and the problem goes away. I don't understand why
Jason needed to add them in the first place.
I didn't need to add them. At some point during all
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 03:57:18PM -0500, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
I noted the tag on the kernel today was updated to 5.0-CURRENT... where
is 4.0-RELEASE?
Multiple choice test:
(1) There's a secret consipiracy going around to keep the release of it really,
really quiet.
(2) The consipiracy is
I'd like to solicit comments on pr 17304. This pr makes it possible
to build a kld outside of the kernel source area. This is useful in
our enviornment because we have lots of different FreeBSD machines
around and we build modules for embedded systems on one sthat are
"close" to the actual
Jim Bloom wrote:
The tag was laid down earlier today. Here is what my current kernel
claims to be at the moment:
I saw the RELENG_4 tag in my cvsup log, but I don't think that's the
same as the 4.0 release tag is it? That would be RELENG_4_0_0_RELEASE
surely.
--
Ben Smithurst / [EMAIL
auth e96ad1c2 subscribe freebsd-current [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], "David E. Cross" writes:
I have had these problems ever since upgrading to -current about a
month ago. The kernel very regularly spews out messages like:
Mar 13 14:23:39 gemini /kernel: calcru: negative time of -2663631 usec for pid
568 (sshd2)
Disable APM
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Nicolai Petri
(ML)" writes:
: Am I the only one who thinks that having a .sample file containing active
: settings is a not so great ting ?
No. It is bad. I was asleep at the time it happened, and didn't
notice until we were in code freeze. In hind sight, Id
hello *!
i was very happy to se, that the eisa bus attachment stuff had been reviewed
and comitted to the source tree. the kernel compiles w/o problems but
panics, when booting :-(
has anybody with an eisa board have had success (maybe my setup is somehow
wrong?!)
relevent kernel messages:
Can everyone please do a make world of RELENG_4 with my latest OpenSSH
changes, and verify that everything still works properly? The only thing
that should have changed is that it will now report a more descriptive
error when trying to talk to a server which uses long (1024 bit) keys and
you're
Is there actually a RELENG_4 (release) ? I have seen a couple messages saying
there is and a few saying there isnt.
On 13-Mar-00 Kris Kennaway wrote:
Can everyone please do a make world of RELENG_4 with my latest OpenSSH
changes, and verify that everything still works properly? The only thing
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 03:33:05PM -0800, William Woods wrote:
Is there actually a RELENG_4 (release) ? I have seen a couple messages saying
there is and a few saying there isnt.
There is a RELENG_4 branch, but no 4.0-RELEASE as yet.
Regards,
--Keith Stevenson--
--
Keith Stevenson
System
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 03:33:05PM -0800, William Woods wrote:
Is there actually a RELENG_4 (release) ? I have seen a couple messages saying
there is and a few saying there isnt.
There is a RELENG_4 (cvsup'ing my CVS repository took forever this
morning ;-), but there is not a 4.0 release tag
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, William Woods wrote:
Is there actually a RELENG_4 (release) ? I have seen a couple messages saying
there is and a few saying there isnt.
Do a cvsup and you'll soon find out :-)
Kris
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, in a never-ending search for enlightenment, Bill Fumerola wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 03:57:18PM -0500, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
I noted the tag on the kernel today was updated to 5.0-CURRENT... where
is 4.0-RELEASE?
Multiple choice test:
(1) There's a secret
Oh, it MUST be #4:-) (hide)
At 04:19 PM 3/13/00 -0500, Bill Fumerola wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 03:57:18PM -0500, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
I noted the tag on the kernel today was updated to 5.0-CURRENT... where
is 4.0-RELEASE?
Multiple choice test:
(1) There's a secret
echo 24.113.25.85 | sed -e s/"\."/" "/g | awk '{$5 = $1*256 + $2; $6 = $3*256 +
$4; printf "2002:%x:%x:\n", $5, $6}'
Or, without only one extra process:
myaddr=24.113.25.85
OIFS="$IFS"
IFS=".$IFS"
set $myaddr
IFS="$OIFS"
printf "2002:%x:%x:\n" $(($1 * 256 + $2)) $(($3 * 256 + $4))
It doesn't helps :(
The card consists of two chips the ES1370 plus a codec chip.
And if I remember correctly that one is different from the
AK4531 on the original Audio PCI card (they used a cheaper one
for the PCI64).
Creative probably bought Ensoniq because of the Audio PCI
card which seems
I am using the new pcm driver which works great, however, I managed to
remove the ln -s to dsp. I do not know what it was linked and 'sh MAKEDEV
snd' links dsp to dsp. How can I fix this?
pcm0: AudioPCI ES1371 port 0xef00-0xef3f irq 7 at device 16.0 on pci0
Thanks,
Aaron
- Aaron Hughes
-
I am using the new pcm driver which works great, however, I managed to
remove the ln -s to dsp. I do not know what it was linked and 'sh MAKEDEV
snd' links dsp to dsp. How can I fix this?
pcm0: AudioPCI ES1371 port 0xef00-0xef3f irq 7 at device 16.0 on pci0
^
sh MAKEDEV snd0 (you would
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Oliver Schonefeld wrote:
i was very happy to se, that the eisa bus attachment stuff had been
reviewed and comitted to the source tree. the kernel compiles w/o
problems but panics, when booting :-( has anybody with an eisa board
have had success (maybe my setup is somehow
Thanks Steve,
That did it, I figured it was something minor I had screwed up.
Aaron
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Steve Coltrin wrote:
I am using the new pcm driver which works great, however, I managed to
remove the ln -s to dsp. I do not know what it was linked and 'sh MAKEDEV
snd' links dsp to
On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 03:13:20PM -0500, Howard Leadmon wrote:
Hello,
I am getting the following errors out of FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT trying to
run an IRC server, and was wondering if anyone had any ideas or recommended
tunables I should set??
Mar 9 22:32:03 u
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 05:28:47PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
...
I would prefer standard maxof() and minof() interfaces that work on
any arithmetic type. These can almost be written in portable C, at
least in C89 where types are restricted to char, signed char, ...,
long double:
#define
Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: This is marvellous in it's simplicity of interface.
:
: Yet, using sizeof(char) and assuming that it's going to be 1, strikes me
: like a dangerous thing to do. I have never heard of machines where this
: isn't true, but I seem to recall that the
Hi,
I can't find the date or sender of the original email - the mailing list archives
haven't been updated since Feb 20 - but my Pentium 66 still panics during boot with a
kernel compiled today. Here's what I get...
atapci0: RZ 100? ATA controller !WARNING! buggy chip data loss possible port
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 05:28:47PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
...
#define isschar(type) (!isfloat(type) issigned(type) sizeof(type) == 1)
This is marvellous in it's simplicity of interface.
Yet, using sizeof(char) and assuming that
On 2000-Mar-14 15:42:52 +1100, Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 05:28:47PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
...
#define isschar(type) (!isfloat(type) issigned(type) sizeof(type) == 1)
This is marvellous in it's
I followed the suggestions from people earlier today. That is to
say that I have upgraded my BIOS to 1012, disabled APM in the BIOS,
and removed 'device apm' from the kernel config, however I still
receive lines like:
calcru: negative time of 20585525 usec for pid 477 (cvsup)
and also lines
[ Please redirect me to a better mailinglist if needed, I haven't had any
replies on this subject yet ]
I'm getting closer.
Basically, I have at home a win-machine behind a FreeBSD box with user-ppp
and isdn. It is cheaper for me to use an alternative ISP than ourselves to
get the machines at
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 09:00:26PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], "David E. Cross" writes:
I have had these problems ever since upgrading to -current about a
month ago. The kernel very regularly spews out messages like:
Mar 13 14:23:39
On 14-Mar-00 Vallo Kallaste wrote:
in the BIOS, no apm in kernel. Two PIII-550, one 20GB IBM disk (ATA).
Same symptoms as above, heavy disk I/O, I was stress-testing the
machine, except the machine hung for some unknown reason: I was able to
switch vty's and ping the machine but not
Try w/o PNPBIOS option. I had the similar problem,
and that fixed it.
Val
-
I followed the suggestions from people earlier today.
That is to
say that I have upgraded my BIOS to 1012, disabled APM
in the BIOS,
and removed 'device apm' from the kernel config,
however
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 04:40:43PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 14-Mar-00 Vallo Kallaste wrote:
in the BIOS, no apm in kernel. Two PIII-550, one 20GB IBM disk (ATA).
Same symptoms as above, heavy disk I/O, I was stress-testing the
machine, except the machine
On 14-Mar-00 Vallo Kallaste wrote:
You mean for Tyan mobo? No, it's version 1.16b nongraphical AMIBIOS
which come with board. I'm having exactly same board but with SCSI only
configuration for my workstation which works without any problem for
half a year now. Also SMP, two PIII-500.
It seems Greg Childers wrote:
Hi,
I can't find the date or sender of the original email - the mailing list archives
haven't been updated since Feb 20 - but my Pentium 66 still panics during boot with a
kernel compiled today. Here's what I get...
atapci0: RZ 100? ATA controller !WARNING!
77 matches
Mail list logo
