sscanf(3) is broken in 5-CURRENT [SIGBUS]

2001-06-02 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Hi, It seems that something is wrong with sscanf(3) in -current - in some cases it may cause SIGBUS. I failed to reproduce the problem on 4-STABLE, so it is a -current specific bug. Attached please find small showcase that exposes the bug in question and a backtrace after SIGBUS. Please fix.

Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigio

2001-06-02 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 09:28:57PM +0900, Seigo Tanimura wrote: David It would also be nice to get a timeline on the commit schedule for this. Test of 2 weeks should be enough, followed by commit in 15 June. I request that this be on hold until we actually get -current Alphas usable again.

dirpref and RELENG_4 fsck

2001-06-02 Thread Kris Kennaway
Was it determined that the fsck corruption problems which were seen with fsck after the introduction of the dirpref changes do not affect RELENG_4? I haven't seen any MFC of changes to the RELENG_4 fsck code, and I'm kind of worried now that I've reverted my current system back to RELENG_4 :-)

Re: dirpref and RELENG_4 fsck

2001-06-02 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010602 18:46] wrote: Was it determined that the fsck corruption problems which were seen with fsck after the introduction of the dirpref changes do not affect RELENG_4? I haven't seen any MFC of changes to the RELENG_4 fsck code, and I'm kind of worried now

Problems booting recent -current

2001-06-02 Thread Tony Fleisher
I just tried to boot a -current kernel cvsupped at Sat Jun 2 14:11:35 PDT 2001, and was thrown the following error trying to boot to single-user (transcribed by hand): src/sys/kern/kern_sync.c:385 sleeping with eventhandler locked from src/sys/kern/subr_eventhandler:159 This came up

Re: usr.sbin/pim6[sd]d will be removed soon.

2001-06-02 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
I wouldn't mind, but what exactly does pim do and do you need both pim6dd and pim6sd? - Original Message - From: Hajimu UMEMOTO [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 11:38 AM Subject: usr.sbin/pim6[sd]d will be removed soon. Hi, I

Re: usr.sbin/pim6[sd]d will be removed soon.

2001-06-02 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
hi, On Sat, 2 Jun 2001 12:22:03 -0500 David W. Chapman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: dwcjr I wouldn't mind, but what exactly does pim do and do you need both pim6dd dwcjr and pim6sd? pim6[ds]d are an IPv6 mutlicast routing daemon. pim6dd is for dense mode and pim6sd is for sparse mode.

usr.sbin/pim6[sd]d will be removed soon.

2001-06-02 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, I heared from itojun that usr.sbin/pim6[sd]d has non-BSD license and does not allow fee-based redistribution. So, I will remove them from the tree soon. NetBSD was already done. Could someone please make them ports? ftp.kame.net:~ftp/pub/kame/misc has pim6[sd]-*.tar.gz. -- Hajimu UMEMOTO