Yes. But our 5.0-RELEASE is will non-polished; so I think having the
compiler in the same shape is OK if it means we can get bugs fixed and
our needs taken care of.
But it's still a relase. :-)
Many IA-64, and AMD x86-64 bug fixes and improvements aren't merged back
to the 3.{1,2} branch.
Hi,
Job control still does not work correctly on -CURRENT built on
Aug 11 13:52:57 EST 2002 (~4 hours ago):
$ su
Password:
cinq# suspend
Suspended (signal)
$ fg
su
cinq# suspend
Suspended (signal)
$ fg
su
cinq# Stopped (tty output)
(I get disconnected)
The problems with chpass getting
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 02:03:40 +1000 (EST) Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't know how open() of a disk device can be interrupted by a
signal in practice. Most disk operations don't check for signals.
How close is our open() to the standards? Does any of them specify EINTR
as a
Hi,
I have a 5.0-CURRENT system (build date 25th of May) with SMP kernel.
Because my SMP mainboard is under repair I placed the disk in a
temporary uniprocessor machine. When I try to boot, the following panic
occurs:
panic: pmap_bootstrap: no local apic! (non-SMP hardware?)
cpuid = 0; lapic.id
Hello,
On 14:43+0100, Aug 10, 2002, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
Hi,
For a few months now I have been seeing the following problems with the
ftpd in current. When transferring a large file, ftpd seems to
consistantly fail after almost all of the file hass been transferred. The
example
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bruce Evans writes:
I don't know how open() of a disk device can be interrupted by a signal
in practice. Most disk operations don't check for signals.
Does the PCATCH tsleep in diskopen() that I mentioned seem a likely
candidate? Anyway, below is a simple program
On Sat, 10 Aug 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
Bruce Evans wrote:
No, but the 3Com driver apparently is. The sio driver wants to have
fast interrupts. It can't have them with the irq is shared, so its
worst-case interrupt latency for a single serial port is increased
from about 50 usec to
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 02:03:40 +1000 (EST) Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't know how open() of a disk device can be interrupted by a
signal in practice. Most disk operations don't check for signals.
How close is our open() to
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
This is sendfile(2) mis-behaviour arised after rev.1.109
sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c but I think the real problem in vn_rdwr(),
sys/kern/vfs_vnops.c. Here is my patch but I really need somebody with
vfs clue. I CC'ed Robert Watson as an author of
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
This is sendfile(2) mis-behaviour arised after rev.1.109
sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c but I think the real problem in vn_rdwr(),
sys/kern/vfs_vnops.c. Here is my patch but I really need somebody with
vfs clue. I CC'ed Robert Watson as an author of
Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on Sunday, August 11, 2002 at 11:33:07
---
: It's not a secret anymore... There is a NEW product available in the United States
:and it is
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
OS: FreeBSD-current DP1 (dmesg attached)
Laptop: Toshiba Tecra 8100 (docked)
Hardware: 3Com Bluetooth USB dongle, 3Com Bluetooth PC-CARD
Xircom CBT PC-CARD (with 16550A UART)
First of all, irq 11 gets shared between PC-CARD
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
I've been tracking each of -STABLE -CURRENT for a while now, so
it's been almost a year since I tried the -STABLE - -CURRENT upgrade
path. Still, I was a bit skeptical when someone on the #FreeBSD
channel at irc.sage-members.org indicated that the make installworld
was failing for him,
Since pkg-comment contains only a single line, wouldn't it be more subtile
to put it in a COMMENT field as does NetBSD, instead of using a file? I think
it would speed up updates.
Sam
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Since pkg-comment contains only a single line, wouldn't it be more subtile
to put it in a COMMENT field as does NetBSD, instead of using a file? I think
it would speed up updates.
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~eric/ports-comment.diff
Will Andrews said that portmgr would be going over this
Hi, I'm intrigued by KSE and would like to write some
program to test it. Is there a PThread library using
KSE for scheduling?
Thanks,
ed
__
Do You Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
http://www.hotjobs.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail
Hello David,
First off, sorry for the lot of snippage but this mail was really
long...
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 11:37:06AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
...
OK; I brought it back up under today's -STABLE, and looking at the typescript
file, I see that it ends thusly:
...
=== usr.bin/checknr
It's me again...
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 11:37:06AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
* reboot (single-user mode)
Now, at this step, I see something a bit odd:
Console: serial port
BIOS drive A: is disk0
BIOS drive C: is disk1
BIOS 639kB/523200kB available memory
FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap
Hi!
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
This is sendfile(2) mis-behaviour arised after rev.1.109
sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c but I think the real problem in vn_rdwr(),
sys/kern/vfs_vnops.c. Here is my patch but I really need somebody with
[[ I've read the rest of this thread ]]
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maksim Yevmenkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: My tests are very simple. I plug USB dongle and one PC-CARD
: and try to pump data between them as fast as possible. The
: data blocks sizes are between 63 and 1500
Ed Yu wrote:
Hi, I'm intrigued by KSE and would like to write some
program to test it. Is there a PThread library using
KSE for scheduling?
the Kernel support for KSE treads is only partially implemented.
Ihe user library is only in initial stages of design..
Any recent talk about KSE
On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 18:07, Ian Dowse wrote:
[replying to an old message]
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexander Leidi
nger writes:
On 7 Mai, Benjamin Lewis wrote:
| DUMP: slave couldn't reopen disk: Interrupted system call
Try the attached patch.
[...]
I was just looking
I am forwarding this to -current as I think it needs more neurons on it..
I am presently unable to spend any due to work commitments, and due to a sort-of
personal confusion about tis stuff anyhow..
David Xu wrote:
does anyone believe that su behaviours correctly?
we are talking that
David Xu wrote:
want, and all job control gets weird. I suguest this job control
assumption should be removed, strange thing is why su calls fork()?
why doesn't call directly execvl()? I don't see su calls fork() in
OpenBSD.
This has to do with PAM, AFAIK. Someone has to call PAM
--- Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 17:41:20 +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 06:28:54 -0700, David Xu wrote:
does anyone believe that su behaviours correctly?
I not believe in that first, so why I remove tcsetpgrg() in my
Hi Folks,
I got this kernel panic yesterday and this has happened twice in the
last two days.
--
/usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with inp locked from
/usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_usrreq.c:1013
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel
An Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 09:35:34AM +0530, Sid Carter schreib :
I got this kernel panic yesterday and this has happened twice in the
last two days.
--
/usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with inp locked from
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
--- David Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 17:41:20 +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 06:28:54 -0700, David Xu wrote:
does anyone believe that su behaviours correctly?
I not believe in that
David Xu wrote:
following is patch for su, I can type suspend and stop $$ without the
problem you described, I have tested it under tcsh and bash, all works
for me.
[ ... ]
Looks like a patch to a user space program to deal with POSIX
non-compliance of the host OS.
-- Terry
To Unsubscribe:
31 matches
Mail list logo
