On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 12:18:45AM +0100, Jens Rehsack wrote:
Aurelien Nephtali wrote:
Hi,
I've upgraded from 4.2.0 to 4.2.1 and now X11 doesn't want to start :/
I've attached the error log.
Any help would be appreciated :)
-- Aurelien
1) How did you upgrade?
2) What's the name of
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 10:11:29 +0100, Aurelien Nephtali
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I've upgraded from 4.2.0 to 4.2.1 and now X11 doesn't want to start :/
I've attached the error log.
1) How did you upgrade?
2) What's the name of your machine?
Aurelien I've
Aurelien Nephtali wrote:
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 12:18:45AM +0100, Jens Rehsack wrote:
Aurelien Nephtali wrote:
Hi,
I've upgraded from 4.2.0 to 4.2.1 and now X11 doesn't want to start :/
I've attached the error log.
Any help would be appreciated :)
-- Aurelien
1) How did you upgrade?
2)
Hi,
just tried to upgrade to RC2. But when I start 'make buildworld', I get
the following output:
bash-2.05b# make -j4 buildworld
Running test variables
PASS: Test variables detected no regression, output matches.
Running test targets
Makefile, line 53: warning: duplicate script for target
On (23/12/02 11:55), Gernot A. Weber wrote:
Building an up-to-date make(1)
But it is compiling anyway. Are these errors anything I have to worry
about? Or should it be no problem to do a 'make installworld' after
compilation has finished?
Yes it is, the checks at the beginning only check if
On 2002-12-22 17:19, walt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Hasenbein wrote:
I've tried to upgrade to -current a few minutes ago. Before
upgrading I had FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE-p2
After a make buildworld / make buildkernel /make installkernel
and rebooting, I still have FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE-p2
The system panics when I mount my Windows 2000 NTFS partition. It is
easily repeatable on -RC1 and -CURRENT as of December 20. Hardware is
AMD Duron, KT133, Fujitsu IDE UDMA 66 HDD, with ACPI enabled.
Short backtrace:
db tr
Debugger()
panic(c04474ce, c76e96f8, 2 c76e96f8,
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 03:12:50PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2002-12-22 17:19, walt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Hasenbein wrote:
I've tried to upgrade to -current a few minutes ago. Before
upgrading I had FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE-p2
After a make buildworld / make buildkernel
Hello -current,
I'm seeing a bit (12 or more per day) of
PAWS ack-on-ack loop avoided in my /var/log/messages
Which appears to just be triggered by a mechanism to drop
bad packets. Is this correct? Is this something I should be
concerned about?
Thanks in advance,
./muk
--
m. kolb [EMAIL
Hi all,
I'm trying to get my laptop running, with some success, but the
network card is not very friendly to me.
none3@pci0:4:0: class=0x02 card=0x105517c0 chip=0x09001039 rev=0x91 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Silicon Integrated Systems (SiS)'
device = 'SiS900 Fast Ethernet/Home
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 04:22:22PM +0100, Martin Blapp wrote the words in effect of:
Hi all,
I'm trying to get my laptop running, with some success, but the
network card is not very friendly to me.
none3@pci0:4:0: class=0x02 card=0x105517c0 chip=0x09001039 rev=0x91 hdr=0x00
Hi,
Dec 23 15:17:03 kernel: sis0: Ethernet address: ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
Dec 23 15:17:03 kernel: sis0: MII without any PHY!
Dec 23 15:17:03 kernel: device_probe_and_attach: sis0 attach returned 6
Dec 23 15:17:03 kernel: sis0: SiS 900 10/100BaseTX port 0x2000-0x20ff mem
It seems Martin Blapp wrote:
--- sys/dev/ata/ata-dma.c.origMon Dec 23 14:44:39 2002
+++ sys/dev/ata/ata-dma.c Mon Dec 23 15:49:20 2002
@@ -632,7 +632,9 @@
ata_find_dev(parent, 0x06351039, 0) || /* SiS 635 */
ata_find_dev(parent, 0x06401039, 0) || /*
I've gotten this two days in a row (but wasn't configured to get a core
dump the 1st day):
kernel.debug + vmcore + src tree available to trusted individuals.
Sources are from Sat Dec 21 11:00 PST 2002.
GNU gdb 5.2.1 (FreeBSD)
This GDB was configured as i386-undermydesk-freebsd...
(kgdb)
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 10:13:29AM -0500, Matthew Kolb wrote:
Hello -current,
I'm seeing a bit (12 or more per day) of
PAWS ack-on-ack loop avoided in my /var/log/messages
Which appears to just be triggered by a mechanism to drop
bad packets. Is this correct? Is this something I should
This is 100% identical to my panic.
My system is a dual athlon/2G system too.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], David O'Brien writes:
---
#0 doadump () at ../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:232
232dumping++;
(kgdb) bt
#0 doadump () at ../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:232
#1 0xc01eac9e in
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andy Farkas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
:
: $FreeBSD: src/UPDATING,v 1.228 2002/10/30 20:11:07 imp Exp $
:
: To upgrade from 4.x-stable to current suggests:
:
: cd src/sys/boot ; make install [6]
:
: This does not work. You need to:
:
: cd
Hi Soeren,
This does not work correctly, your ATA timings are way out of wack
since botht ATA100 and ATA133 SiS chips uses different register
layouts...
I know. This is just a workaround. At least my box does not hang during
boot and ATA100 seems to work. No crash since then.
Do you have a
The printf() is only in HEAD for feedback purposes. I'd like to leave
it in there just a little while longer (maybe a week at the rate things
are going). It looks like more people are hitting this bug(fix) then
we previously thought would hit it, which is actually somewhat
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 09:23:30AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
The printf() is only in HEAD for feedback purposes. I'd like to leave
it in there just a little while longer (maybe a week at the rate things
are going). It looks like more people are hitting this bug(fix) then
On Monday, December 23, 2002, at 12:23 PM, Matthew Dillon wrote:
The printf() is only in HEAD for feedback purposes. I'd like to
leave
it in there just a little while longer (maybe a week at the rate
things
are going). It looks like more people are hitting this bug(fix)
then
In the last episode (Dec 23), Matthew Dillon said:
The printf() is only in HEAD for feedback purposes. I'd like to
leave it in there just a little while longer (maybe a week at the
rate things are going). It looks like more people are hitting this
bug(fix) then we previously thought would
Got another panic with a Sat Dec 21 11:00 PST 2002 kernel:
GNU gdb 5.2.1 (FreeBSD)
This GDB was configured as i386-undermydesk-freebsd...
(kgdb) core-file /var/crash/vmcore.1
panic: lockmgr: draining against myself
panic messages:
---
panic: lockmgr: draining against myself
cpuid = 1; lapic.id =
:I've got this on my development box which doesn't run any services.
:I don't remember exactly what I've been doing when these appeared;
:probably printing some connection data like IPs and ports from TCB
:would help.
:
:
:Cheers,
:--=20
:Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA,
:[EMAIL
Hi,
Dec 23 15:17:03 kernel: sis0: Ethernet address: ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
Dec 23 15:17:03 kernel: sis0: MII without any PHY!
Dec 23 15:17:03 kernel: device_probe_and_attach: sis0 attach
returned 6
Dec 23 15:17:03 kernel: sis0: SiS 900 10/100BaseTX port
0x2000-0x20ff mem
I was just going through the list of projects at the FreeBSD website. I
didn't see one for the installer. I was curious if anyone was working on
an upgrade/replacement for sysinstall... I know of Jordan's paper on the
subject, et al, but curious if anyone was doing anything more than maintaining
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 03:39:05PM -0500, Brian J. McGovern wrote:
I was just going through the list of projects at the FreeBSD website. I
didn't see one for the installer. I was curious if anyone was working on
an upgrade/replacement for sysinstall... I know of Jordan's paper on the
subject,
Hi,
I forgot to drop into single user mode before doing make installworld. The
process finished without any obvious errors. Should I do it again in
single user mode or is it safe and enough to reboot the computer after
compiling the new kernel? It is no machine with hundreds of users. During
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Brian J. McGov
ern writes:
I was just going through the list of projects at the FreeBSD website. I
didn't see one for the installer. I was curious if anyone was working on
an upgrade/replacement for sysinstall... I know of Jordan's paper on the
subject, et al, but
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 09:58:59PM +0100, Gernot A. Weber wrote:
I forgot to drop into single user mode before doing make installworld. The
process finished without any obvious errors. Should I do it again in
single user mode or is it safe and enough to reboot the computer after
compiling the
:Hello -current,
:
:I'm seeing a bit (12 or more per day) of
:PAWS ack-on-ack loop avoided in my /var/log/messages
:
:Which appears to just be triggered by a mechanism to drop
:bad packets. Is this correct? Is this something I should be
:concerned about?
:
:Thanks in advance,
:
:./muk
:
:--
From: Gernot A. Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 3:58 PM
Hi,
I forgot to drop into single user mode before doing make installworld. The
process finished without any obvious errors.
I do this all the time when upgrading remotely. The primary issue with
rebooting
I am currently testing FreeBSD 5.0-DP2 on my Sony Vaio FX-210 laptop. I am
having some error messages from the ACPI driver, so I figured I would report
them just in case. If anyone needs any more information, perhaps more
verbose debug output or something, please let me know.
I am getting the
I'm not sure for how long but at least last couple of weeks any attempt to
mount CD with UDF gives
panic: lockmgr: locking against myself
plus quiet reboot (no dump, no break to DDB - nothing) on my -CURRENT box.
uname -a output:
FreeBSD kushnir1.kiev.ua 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #1: Sun
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 10:55:05 -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
That's very odd. I see them on my development box too which is just
talking FreeBSD-FreeBSD. We should not be seeing them at all.
I got about 200 of them per 6 hours. Nothing unusual, small webserver +
SMTP.
--
Andrey
Hi,
Can someone who has a mpt(4) device tell me if their interrupt frequency
is as absurd as mine is?
\begin{verbatim}
mckinley% vmstat -i
interrupt total rate
clock 272238 1019
ohci1 1 0
fxp0
All,
Just a quick report - testing 5.0 rc2 on a dual xeon 2.0G (Supermicro p4dce+).
Seems that if I compile the kernel with CPU greater that I486_CPU, the
machine will boot, startx, be usable for a random period of time and then
lock up.
I dont know if the lockups occur in single CPU mode or
Vladimir Kushnir wrote:
I'm not sure for how long but at least last couple of weeks any attempt to
mount CD with UDF gives
panic: lockmgr: locking against myself
plus quiet reboot (no dump, no break to DDB - nothing) on my -CURRENT box.
uname -a output:
FreeBSD kushnir1.kiev.ua 5.0-CURRENT
Hello,
I'm trying to figure out how to get apm to run on 5.0 RC1. I have a Thinkpad
390x; apm worked on 4.7.
If I run apmd -d, I get:
apmd[776]: start
apmd: cannot open device file `/dev/apmctl': No such file or directory
Okay, I think. I look for /dev/MAKEDEV, it's missing. After some
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sean LeBlanc wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to figure out how to get apm to run on 5.0 RC1. I have a Thinkpad
390x; apm worked on 4.7.
If I run apmd -d, I get:
apmd[776]: start
apmd: cannot open device file `/dev/apmctl': No such file or directory
You are running ACPI
In message 004b01c2aade$812bfb00$f100a8c0@JEREMIAH, Jeremiah Gowdy wrote:
I am currently testing FreeBSD 5.0-DP2 on my Sony Vaio FX-210 laptop. I am
having some error messages from the ACPI driver, so I figured I would report
them just in case. If anyone needs any more information, perhaps more
All,
Sorry about the largely incorehant post previously. Here are some more
details:
DMESG - I just know someone is going to ask.
The bad cookie messages - machine is served by linux running on a sparc. Does
not seem to cause a problem.
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 10:40:33AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
that the pcc struct return convention had something to do with it.
Did we really mean to change this? It is a relatively recent change. From
cvs history:
% RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/contrib/gcc/config/freebsd.h,v
% Working
You want email addresses; we've got lots of fresh ones.
Face it, there's no way you're going to extract 400 million email addresses
with some flimsy email extractor program you downloaded from the web.
You're lucky if you can extract 2 million in a year!
Our email addresses are even targeted in
44 matches
Mail list logo
