Juli Mallett (Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 12:18:38AM -0600) wrote:
This fixed yet?
xl0: discard frame w/o packet header
Fatal trap 12:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x20
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc01d47c6
stack pointer = 0x10:0xc5d33a90
frame pointer = 0x10:0xc5d33ab4
code segment= base
I am posting on behalf of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Attached is his patch for Asus WL100 wireless lan card.
Jiawei
--
Without the userland, the kernel is useless.
--inspired by The Tao of Programming
ASUS_WL100_diff_FreeBSD5.tar.gz
Description: application/tar-gz
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 10:07:35AM +0200, Petri Helenius wrote:
I think there is nothing really special about the driver there? The mbufs
are allocated in the driver and then freed when other parts in the kernel
are done with the packet? The issue I´m having is that mb_free takes
almost four
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 01:24, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 09:22:06PM +0800, Khairil Yusof wrote:
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 06:00, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
For the first time I compile current-p3 - current-p4 with
-march=pentium2 -O2 -mmmx -pipe and aparently everything works ok
There's probably a tightloop of frees going on somewhere. It's tough
for me to analyze this as I cannot reproduce it. Have you tried
running your tests over loopback to see if the same thing happens?
What is the definition of tightloop? The received packet mbufs are freed
when the
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 05:00:42PM +0200, Petri Helenius wrote:
There's probably a tightloop of frees going on somewhere. It's tough
for me to analyze this as I cannot reproduce it. Have you tried
running your tests over loopback to see if the same thing happens?
What is the
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 10:47:17PM +0800, Khairil Yusof wrote:
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 01:24, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 09:22:06PM +0800, Khairil Yusof wrote:
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 06:00, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
For the first time I compile current-p3 - current-p4 with
Hello all
Mission control has launched the retro-rocket module to de-orbit
KerberosIV (AKA eBones).
This package has had a long and illustrious career with FreeBSD;
it is now time for a graceful retirement in the ports tree.
The de-orbiting process will happen this weekend, in stages.
Long
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 09:41:07AM +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
All interactive tasks are very responsive. My nice -5'd looping process
is getting 70% of the cpu and my compile is taking the rest. nice +20 may
not behave as well as in sched_4bsd right now. I'm going to work on that.
On 07-Mar-2003 Juli Mallett wrote:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x20
fault code= supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc01d47c6
stack pointer = 0x10:0xc5d33a90
frame pointer = 0x10:0xc5d33ab4
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 08:57:01AM -0800, Kris Kennaway
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As noted in Jeff's original mail, niced processes do not behave nicely
yet.
Yes, I'm sorry that slipped off my first reading. Otherwise, the new
scheduler is very useable for me. Thanks for pointing out, Kris.
--
Gang,
During the make depend stage of buildworld, I get the following:
=== kerberos5/libexec/hpropd
=== kerberos5/libexec/k5admind
cp
/p/scratch/marcel/ia64/kerberos5/libexec/k5admind/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/kadm5/private.h
kadm5/private.h
cp: kadm5/private.h: Permission denied
*** Error
Petri Helenius wrote:
There's probably a tightloop of frees going on somewhere. It's tough
for me to analyze this as I cannot reproduce it. Have you tried
running your tests over loopback to see if the same thing happens?
What is the definition of tightloop? The received packet
In article local.mail.freebsd-current/[EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
Petri Helenius wrote:
There's probably a tightloop of frees going on somewhere. It's tough
for me to analyze this as I cannot reproduce it. Have you tried
running your tests over loopback to see if the same thing
I've got a 160GB ide drive in my FBSD box. It's got an old ide controller that doesn't
support big ide drives. Yet freebsd recognizes the drives full capacity, allows me to
partition it, and newfs it. After writing about 47GB of data to the drive, I start
getting these.
ad5: WRITE command
Okay... Perhaps I'm just a dumbass with a failing drive? For the longest time, I've
thought the hardware needed to support the large drives. From the reading I've just
done, that doesn't seem to be the case. I certainly hope this brand new drive isn't
failing tho. I really hate doing hardware
I'm getting this error when trying to compile kernels for the last
few days:
cc -c -O -pipe -march=athlon -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-p
rototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-e
xtensions -ansi -g -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/usr/src/sys
On Wednesday, 26 February 2003 21:13, C. Kukulies wrote:
My ASUS board has a SiS 963 chip and I would like to get rid from the extra
3COM card I have presently in my system.
Is there a chance to get the built in 100MBit network adapter in the
chipset working somehow?
I have an ASUS P4S8X with
I'm hoping some of you have played with dvarchive in the past or may have a
use for it in the future.
http://dvarchive.sourceforge.net
It seems to work okayish with linux-sun-jdk141
With jdk-1.4.1p3, it almost works. It has a server component that launches
and binds two sockets. Port 80 and one
On Wednesday 05 March 2003 07:42, Pete Carah wrote:
I don't know how system-specific this problem is, but:
Sony VAIO R505ES
Sound is Intel ICH3 + Yamaha.
This or something closely related has been happening for weeks.
Several times earlier this week and last week sound panic'd, and
also
Hi All,
To help myself more easily check the kernel dump, I added two new command. One
is ps, the other is kldstat. I know we can print the kernel data manually to
get the same information. I still think this is useful. This can help the
newbies to get the information without many knowledge
People have been saying that 5.0-CURRENT problems belong here.
I don't know if this is Gnome2 or Xfree86...
I noticed tonight that the Gnome2 desktop terminal stopped working.
When I open a terminal window, I do not get a command prompt. I have a
flashing solid block cursor in the top left
I've been getting a few of these on 5.0 lately:
Mar 7 21:31:07 kern.crit bento kernel: failed to set signal flags properly for ast()
Is there any additional debugging information I can provide to help
track this down?
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 00:15, Tom Parquette wrote:
People have been saying that 5.0-CURRENT problems belong here.
I don't know if this is Gnome2 or Xfree86...
Both work fine for me in -CURRENT.
I noticed tonight that the Gnome2 desktop terminal stopped working.
What changed between the last
Hi,
this may be unrelated, but for about ten days or so, I have problems
where gnometerminal will stop updating after a while. I can still use
the menus, close it, etc. - but all output is suspended. Most of the
time, selecting Reset from the menu repeatedly will eventually get me
back to a
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 09:41:07AM +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
Althought much better, KDE is still almost unusable, XFree and KDE
startup takes a lot more time and starting plain xterm under KDE
takes x3 time than usual. When I kill one of the seti
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 11:30:34PM -0800, Lars Eggert wrote:
Hi,
this may be unrelated, but for about ten days or so, I have problems
where gnometerminal will stop updating after a while. I can still use
the menus, close it, etc. - but all output is suspended. Most of the
time, selecting
I'd been keeping up with current (world/kernel) every other week or so,
and until this week I had no real problems. But after the build I did on
March 3rd my soundcard driver (4Front's SBLive/Audigy driver) causes a
kernel panic on load. If I don't load the driver the system boots fine,
and runs
29 matches
Mail list logo
