This is an automated bi-daily mailing of the FreeBSD 5.1 open issues list.
The live version of this list is available at:
http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/5.1R/todo.html
Automated mailing of this list will continue through the release of
FreeBSD 5.1.
FreeBSD 5.1
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 11:32:06 +0200
Stefan Bethke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Dienstag, 03.06.03, um 07:57 Uhr (Europe/Berlin) schrieb Andreas
Klemm:
ad2: UDMA ICRC error cmd=read fsbn 74689079 of 74689079-74689206
retrying
ad2: UDMA ICRC error cmd=read fsbn 74689079 of
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 06:28:26PM -0400, James Tanis wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2003 17:39:18 -0400 (EDT)
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It has been committed. Build rtld with WITH_LIBMAP defined and then
setup a libmap.conf.
--
Alright, I compiled and installed
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 09:04:11AM -0700, Hiten Pandya wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 08:17:03AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
Hiten Pandya wrote:
My fingers have been itching to do this since the day phk@ planted this
idea in my brain (re: cdevsw initialisations). Basically, it changes
cc -O -pipe -nostdinc -I/usr/include -I. -I/usr/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aicasm
-D__FBSDID=__RCSID -c aicasm_scan.c
cc -O -pipe -nostdinc -I/usr/include -I. -I/usr/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aicasm
-D__FBSDID=__RCSID -c aicasm_macro_scan.c
cc -O -pipe -nostdinc -I/usr/include -I.
Are there anybody who can upgrade to 5.1-RC1 successfully with Xeon
or Pentium4 ? I can newly install 5.1-RC1, but I can not upgrade from
5.1-BETA or 5.1-RC1 to 5.1-RC1 with Xeon or Pentium4 without panics.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 03 Jun 2003 23:52:38 +0900 (JST)
Masachika ISHIZUKA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there anybody who can upgrade to 5.1-RC1 successfully with Xeon
or Pentium4 ? I can newly install 5.1-RC1, but I can not upgrade from
5.1-BETA or 5.1-RC1 to 5.1-RC1 with Xeon or Pentium4 without panics.
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: You should look at kobj, it's precisely this sort of dynamic
: dispatching that it was designed to support.
Too bad it is a little slow and not MP safe in its implementation.
Warner
Are there anybody who can upgrade to 5.1-RC1 successfully with Xeon
or Pentium4 ? I can newly install 5.1-RC1, but I can not upgrade from
5.1-BETA or 5.1-RC1 to 5.1-RC1 with Xeon or Pentium4 without panics.
Here, here. I was doing installworld and got a double fault. After
rebooting with
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 23:52:38 +0900 (JST)
From: Masachika ISHIZUKA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are there anybody who can upgrade to 5.1-RC1 successfully with Xeon
or Pentium4 ? I can newly install 5.1-RC1, but I can not upgrade from
5.1-BETA or 5.1-RC1 to 5.1-RC1 with
I got this strange message and a core dump after installing
5.1-RC1 cdrom iso
checking if c++ supports bool types... yes
checking if conversion of longlong to float works... Segmentation fault
(core du
mped)
no
configure: error: Your compiler cannot convert a longlong value to a float!
If you
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 08:56:59AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: You should look at kobj, it's precisely this sort of dynamic
: dispatching that it was designed to support.
Too bad it is a little slow and not
I'm trying to upgrade RELENG_4 to RELENG_5_1 using source and make
buildworld compiles
a while and then stops with:
Question is if this is supported and if yes, what should I do differently?
Pete
cc -fpic -DPIC -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -DPTHREAD_KERNEL
On Tue, 03 Jun 2003 18:51:59 +0300
Petri Helenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade RELENG_4 to RELENG_5_1 using source and make
buildworld compiles
a while and then stops with:
Question is if this is supported and if yes, what should I do
differently?
Pete
Got your
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
If you have had issues with libthr on SMP or umtx panics, the following
patch may solve these issues.
http://www.chesapeake.net/~jroberson/umtxlocks.diff
This patch fixes several race conditions and other issues with umtx.
Actually, no it doesn't.
Bryan Liesner wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
If you have had issues with libthr on SMP or umtx panics, the following
patch may solve these issues.
http://www.chesapeake.net/~jroberson/umtxlocks.diff
This patch fixes several race conditions and other issues with umtx.
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: I'm not sure that kobj actually needs to be MP safe if the kobj
: struct is always embedded in a structure at a higher level i.e.
: a use of kobj in say the device driver code will not interact with
: it's use by
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Scott Long wrote:
Actually, I think it's cam in general that's causing the panic with
these changes.
Please see kern/52718
I didn't see a backtrace in the PR. Is there one that you can share
with us?
It panics during boot and, unfortunately, no dump is produced.
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 01:54:36AM -0500, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
On 02-Jun-2003 Nicolas Souchu wrote:
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 01:52:57AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
viapropm is seriously broken for other reasons and needs professional
help.
What kind of breakage? Setting
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On (2003/06/01 23:53), Narvi wrote:
The absence of credible Java support in FreeBSD has lost us significant
penetration in the past, and it would be disastrous if the perceptions
of the past shaped the future.
credible rather sounds like
I don't know for how long this has been broken but vmstat
always reports 0 (zero) for the number of system calls
executed which is virtually impossible.
This is on a system built
FreeBSD darkstar 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #1: Tue Jun 3 02:48:51
CEST 2003
darkstar# vmstat -s | grep system
++ 03/06/03 20:47 +0200 - Pawel Worach:
| I don't know for how long this has been broken but vmstat
| always reports 0 (zero) for the number of system calls
| executed which is virtually impossible.
|
| This is on a system built
| FreeBSD darkstar 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #1: Tue Jun 3
Is there anyone that has succesfully used acpiconf -s 4?
I'm very interested in your reports. If you haven't tried yet, but are
willing to help me, please report me your findings.
Thanks
Mark
--
Mark SantcroosRIPE Network Coordination Centre
http://www.ripe.net/home/mark/
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 12:02:44PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2003 18:51:59 +0300
Petri Helenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade RELENG_4 to RELENG_5_1 using source and make
buildworld compiles
a while and then stops with:
Question is if this is
I put my test results in:
http://anarcat.ath.cx/acpi-test/
I have done other tests using a build made after the recent ACPI
import and bugfixes, and I will update the info there when completely
done.
A.
On Tue Jun 03, 2003 at 05:32:05PM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote:
Is there anyone that has
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 18:19, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: I'm not sure that kobj actually needs to be MP safe if the kobj
: struct is always embedded in a structure at a higher level i.e.
: a use of kobj in say the
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 12:56:01 -0700
Crist J. Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, I didn't have any trouble building RELENG_5_1 on RELENG_4, but I
have been getting the same failure originally quoted when building
HEAD on RELENG_4 for several days now.
I suggest that the original poster
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Pete Fritchman wrote:
++ 03/06/03 20:47 +0200 - Pawel Worach:
| I don't know for how long this has been broken but vmstat
| always reports 0 (zero) for the number of system calls
| executed which is virtually impossible.
|
| This is on a system built
| FreeBSD darkstar
I have made some Benchmark on my inspiron 8500 (Intel 82801DB (ICH4) -
UDMA100)
and i am geting very Bad results on the 5.1, i have got beter results on 5.0
dmesg
--
5.0R -- http://www.x123.info/src/i8500/dmesg.5.0R
5.1B2 -- http://www.x123.info/src/i8500/dmesg.5.1B2
Check out the output
On 2003.06.03 22:20:56 +0200, Sebastian Yepes [ESN] wrote:
I have made some Benchmark on my inspiron 8500 (Intel 82801DB (ICH4) -
UDMA100)
and i am geting very Bad results on the 5.1, i have got beter results on 5.0
Beta2 still had all the debugging options in the kernel, so unless you
Bryan Liesner wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Scott Long wrote:
Actually, I think it's cam in general that's causing the panic with
these changes.
Please see kern/52718
I didn't see a backtrace in the PR. Is there one that you can share
with us?
It panics during boot and, unfortunately, no dump is
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 21:04, Paul Richards wrote:
The tradeoff with using an index into an array is that there'd be a
heavy penalty for growing the array if an extra method didn't fit, but
that would be exceptionally rare and with our present usage we'd never
have that happen.
I'm not sure
Hi
I still get a
fxp0: device timeout
on my Thinkpad T30 with a newly installed 5.1BETA2. Browsing the
archives showed that people had success with
hint.fxp.0.prefer_iomap=1
on a T30 and 5.1BETA1. Any ideas why this doesn't help in my case?
thx, t.
I am trying to get ggv link against libc_r instead libthr, but it doesn't
work as expect.. Maybe, I must have done something wrong?
# cat /etc/libmap.conf
libc_r.so.5 libthr.so.1
libc_r.so libthr.so
[/usr/X11R6/bin/ggv]
libc_r.so.5
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Doug, am I missing something?
I think we can have more than 256 methods, en toto, since any object
can implement multiple interface types and we don't know, a-priori,
how many different interfaces a given object
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Scott Long wrote:
It's very hard to imagine Jeff's patches causing a problem at the point
that the PR mentions. Have you confirmed the problem in a kernel that
was build in a totally clean environment?
Scott
If you mean a kernel build with standard optimizations, yes I
On 02-Jun-2003 Paul Richards wrote:
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 21:04, Paul Richards wrote:
The tradeoff with using an index into an array is that there'd be a
heavy penalty for growing the array if an extra method didn't fit, but
that would be exceptionally rare and with our present usage we'd
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Baldwin writes:
On 02-Jun-2003 Paul Richards wrote:
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 21:04, Paul Richards wrote:
The tradeoff with using an index into an array is that there'd be a
heavy penalty for growing the array if an extra method didn't fit, but
that would be
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
I have an asr based RAID controller (Adaptec 2400A), though it is an IDE
RAID controller, it uses the SCSI asr driver. My controller has
worked very well with FreeBSD 5.x, and the server is currently running
5.1-BETA. The only thing that doesn't
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 01:23:35AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jun 03), Andreas Klemm said:
Hi,
my console today shows the following error message from my disk:
ad2: UDMA ICRC error cmd=read fsbn 74689079 of 74689079-74689206 retrying
ad2: UDMA ICRC error cmd=read
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 22:36, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Baldwin writes:
On 02-Jun-2003 Paul Richards wrote:
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 21:04, Paul Richards wrote:
The tradeoff with using an index into an array is that there'd be a
heavy penalty for
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 11:32:06AM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote:
Am Dienstag, 03.06.03, um 07:57 Uhr (Europe/Berlin) schrieb Andreas
Klemm:
ad2: UDMA ICRC error cmd=read fsbn 74689079 of 74689079-74689206
retrying
ad2: UDMA ICRC error cmd=read fsbn 74689079 of 74689079-74689206
retrying
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 22:00, Tobias Roth wrote:
Hi
I still get a
fxp0: device timeout
I get these as well. Is it on irq9 by any chance, along with acpi0 ?
--
Tis a wise thing to know what is wanted, wiser still to know when
it has been achieved and wisest of all to know when it is
In the last episode (Jun 03), Andreas Klemm said:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 01:23:35AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jun 03), Andreas Klemm said:
ad2: UDMA ICRC error cmd=read fsbn 74689079 of 74689079-74689206 retrying
ad2: UDMA ICRC error cmd=read fsbn 74689079 of
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: The possible methods available in an interface are fixed, they're
: defined in the .m files.
No it isn't. One can add additional interfaces at any time without
breaking binary compatibility, so you don't know, a
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 10:59:22PM +0100, Paul Richards wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 22:00, Tobias Roth wrote:
fxp0: device timeout
I get these as well. Is it on irq9 by any chance, along with acpi0 ?
No. It's on irc 11 device 8 (as dmesg states). All irqs in bios are
set to 11
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 11:40:40PM +0800, leafy wrote:
I got this strange message and a core dump after installing
5.1-RC1 cdrom iso
checking if c++ supports bool types... yes
checking if conversion of longlong to float works... Segmentation fault
(core du
mped)
no
configure: error:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 05:32:05PM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote:
Is there anyone that has succesfully used acpiconf -s 4?
I'm very interested in your reports. If you haven't tried yet, but are
willing to help me, please report me your findings.
Hello Mark, I may not be totally
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 23:09, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: The possible methods available in an interface are fixed, they're
: defined in the .m files.
No it isn't. One can add additional interfaces at any time
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul Richards wr
ites:
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 22:36, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
I thought the point in KOBJ was that it was extensible so you could
KLD load stuff which added more methods ?
Not exactly. It allows for dynamic binding of methods that implement a
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 23:17, Tobias Roth wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 10:59:22PM +0100, Paul Richards wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 22:00, Tobias Roth wrote:
fxp0: device timeout
I get these as well. Is it on irq9 by any chance, along with acpi0 ?
No. It's on irc 11 device 8
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 00:03, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul Richards wr
ites:
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 22:36, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
I thought the point in KOBJ was that it was extensible so you could
KLD load stuff which added more methods ?
Not exactly. It
I found the problem; it only occurs if I try to boot with my Palm cradle
attached to COM1. Remove it, and everything works fine.
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 11:20:27PM -0400, Guy Middleton wrote:
I'm posting a follup to -current, since I get a similar but different problem
with the 5.1-BETA2 CD.
Hmm, I didn't have any trouble building RELENG_5_1 on RELENG_4, but I
have been getting the same failure originally quoted when building
HEAD on RELENG_4 for several days now.
I suggest that the original poster double-check that he has RELENG_5_1
and not HEAD. And I do have buildworld logs.
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 10:15:41AM +1000, Matthew Gardiner wrote:
Hmm, I didn't have any trouble building RELENG_5_1 on RELENG_4, but I
have been getting the same failure originally quoted when building
HEAD on RELENG_4 for several days now.
I suggest that the original poster
On 2003-06-04 10:15 +, Matthew Gardiner wrote:
Just a quick question, what version of GCC is going to appear in FreeBSD
5.1? I heard that it maybe GCC 3.2.3 and that GCC 3.3 (depending on its
stability) will be used for 5.2. Could someone either confirm or correct me
on this
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 03:50:00PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
I am trying to get ggv link against libc_r instead libthr, but it doesn't
work as expect.. Maybe, I must have done something wrong?
Make sure that you have rev 1.6 of src/libexec/rtld-elf/libmap.c. It fixes
a bug in the
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:03:19 -0400
From: The Anarcat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I put my test results in:
http://anarcat.ath.cx/acpi-test/
I have done other tests using a build made after the recent ACPI
import and bugfixes, and I will update the info there when
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 23:00:21 +0200
From: Tobias Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
I still get a
fxp0: device timeout
on my Thinkpad T30 with a newly installed 5.1BETA2. Browsing the
archives showed that people had success with
hint.fxp.0.prefer_iomap=1
On Tue Jun 03, 2003 at 06:17:10PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:03:19 -0400
From: The Anarcat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I put my test results in:
http://anarcat.ath.cx/acpi-test/
I have done other tests using a build made after the
I gave it a final try and mounted an empty disk into my laptop.
Using the MKS2D.EXE found on the Dell support site I created a hibernation
partition on the beginning of the disk (It needs to be within 8 GB of the
start of the disk).
And guess what... I can now suspend to disk using acpiconf -s
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 04:01:16PM -0700, Hiten Pandya wrote:
Hello Mark, I may not be totally correct, but it has always
helped me to check if a particular ACPI state was supported by
my system:
# sysctl hw.acpi.supported_sleep_state
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 18:01:52 -0700, David P. Reese Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 03:50:00PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
I am trying to get ggv link against libc_r instead libthr, but it
doesn't work as expect.. Maybe, I must have done something wrong?
Make sure that you
On Tue, 03 Jun 2003 21:04:11 -0500, Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 18:01:52 -0700, David P. Reese Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 03:50:00PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
I am trying to get ggv link against libc_r instead libthr, but it
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
It seems like the [/path/to/exec] and [exec] don't work?
ftp://ftp.jurai.net/users/winter/libmap-test.tar
Untar that in src/libexec/rtld-elf/
cd test/
make
./test-libmap /path/to/exec library-name
--
| Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 22:51:59 -0400 (EDT), Matthew N. Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
It seems like the [/path/to/exec] and [exec] don't work?
ftp://ftp.jurai.net/users/winter/libmap-test.tar
Untar that in src/libexec/rtld-elf/
cd test/
make
./test-libmap
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Bryan Liesner wrote:
Actually, no it doesn't. I was able to use kern_umtx v 1.3 only if I
removed atapicam from my kernel config. These patches (now committed?)
panic the system whether I use atapicam or not. With kern_umtx v1.2
there is no panic at all, with or
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:54:30AM -0700, David P. Reese Jr. wrote:
[...]
: The datasheet states that the command bits are RW but fixed at 0.
A snip of code from sys/dev/pci/pci.c:pci_enable_io_method():
pci_set_command_bit(dev, child, bit);
command = PCI_READ_CONFIG(dev,
Paul Richards wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 09:04:11AM -0700, Hiten Pandya wrote:
And how many times is vfc_register() called? Its not in the
patch of an I/O operation or anything. Its just a mount time
overhead which will go through -- a one time thing.
On Mon, Jun
Sebastian Yepes [ESN] wrote:
I have made some Benchmark on my inspiron 8500 (Intel 82801DB (ICH4) -
UDMA100)
and i am geting very Bad results on the 5.1, i have got beter results on 5.0
dmesg
--
5.0R -- http://www.x123.info/src/i8500/dmesg.5.0R
5.1B2 --
Scott Long wrote:
Bryan Liesner wrote:
It's very hard to imagine Jeff's patches causing a problem at the point
that the PR mentions. Have you confirmed the problem in a kernel that
was build in a totally clean environment?
The changed code is not protecting a traversal of a proc
struct
Zbynek Houska wrote:
Dear all,
when I tryied to mount an iso image over network (using samba) my computer
unexpectedly crashed.
I issued this command : mdconfig -a -t vnode -f
/path/to/my/file/mounted/on-local-machine
and since that kernel crashed, no ping response, nothing at all. I've
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
Scott Long wrote:
Bryan Liesner wrote:
It's very hard to imagine Jeff's patches causing a problem at the point
that the PR mentions. Have you confirmed the problem in a kernel that
was build in a totally clean environment?
The changed code is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
=== geom/geom_vol_ffs
I'm getting this error when I buildkernel:
cd: can't cd to /usr/src/sys/modules/geom/geom_vol_ffs
*** Error code 2
Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/geom.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules.
*** Error code 1
Stop in
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Robert Watson wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Bryan Liesner wrote:
Actually, no it doesn't. I was able to use kern_umtx v 1.3 only if I
removed atapicam from my kernel config. These patches (now committed?)
panic the system whether I use atapicam or not. With kern_umtx
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 07:29:31AM +, Nicolas Souchu wrote:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:54:30AM -0700, David P. Reese Jr. wrote:
[...]
: The datasheet states that the command bits are RW but fixed at 0.
A snip of code from sys/dev/pci/pci.c:pci_enable_io_method():
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 04:15:43PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
phoenix on my sparc64 crashed while idle with the following:
Fatal error '_waitq_insert: Already in queue' at line 321 in file
/usr/src/lib/libc_r/uthread/uthread_priority_queue.c (errno = 2)
Any ideas?
Kris
One of the
Mike Loiterman wrote:
=== geom/geom_vol_ffs
I'm getting this error when I buildkernel:
cd: can't cd to /usr/src/sys/modules/geom/geom_vol_ffs
*** Error code 2
Google search just showed that this was added in the beginning of May
'03. Any ideas?
cvs update -d
--
Skip
On Tuesday 03 June 2003 12:00 am, Paul Richards wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 23:09, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: The possible methods available in an interface are fixed, they're
: defined in the .m files.
Hi,
I have a Sony VAIO (PCG-R505TFP) which has an interrupts related problem (this
problem was previous posted elsewhere as Weird as* sound problem). This problem
has been confirmed on at least one other Sony VAIO model (I forget which).
They're both Intel i830M chipset based.
Basically, the
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 21:04, Paul Richards wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 18:19, M. Warner Losh wrote:
Notice how thread 1's _m gets set based on the results of the kobj
lookup, and we have a race, even if thread1 and thread2 took out their
driver instance locks.
That means we have to
Good Explain.
The same problem is in my PCG-R505DC.
Jun Su
--- Iain Templeton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I have a Sony VAIO (PCG-R505TFP) which has an
interrupts related problem (this
problem was previous posted elsewhere as Weird as*
sound problem). This problem
has been confirmed on
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 10:01:07AM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote:
On Tuesday 03 June 2003 12:00 am, Paul Richards wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 23:09, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: The possible methods available
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 12:09:00PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 21:04, Paul Richards wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 18:19, M. Warner Losh wrote:
Notice how thread 1's _m gets set based on the results of the kobj
lookup, and we have a race, even if thread1 and thread2
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 13:24, Paul Richards wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 10:01:07AM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote:
On Tuesday 03 June 2003 12:00 am, Paul Richards wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 23:09, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Richards [EMAIL
Hi,
I've added definitions for a few of the devices that I have connected up
to my system at the moment.
Regards,
Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant
Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/--- usbdevs.origWed Jun 4 18:10:45 2003
+++ usbdevs
I have opened a PR with a cleaner patch:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=52959
A.
--
Seul a un caractère scientifique ce qui peut être réfuté. Ce qui n'est
pas réfutable relève de la magie ou de la mystique.
- Popper, Karl
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 09:44:38AM +0800, leafy wrote:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 03:55:47PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Post the code it's trying to run. It's possible it's buggy.
Kris
#include stdio.h
typedef long long longlong;
main()
{
longlong ll=1;
float f;
FILE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, June 03, 2003 9:09 AM Fernando Gleiser
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you run mergemaster(8) after buildworld/installworld ?
I did but, I must have skipped the pam file. My fault. Thanks for
the help.
-
89 matches
Mail list logo
