Mark Sergeant wrote:
Just seeking some general information. I've got a couple of dell 8 cpu
boxes here running FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE and am interested in peoples
thoughts on the best kernel configs for this type of machine. I'm
interested in the best way of making use of 8 cpu's and also seeing
:Can you add
:options PSM_DEBUG=2
:to your kernel config and recompile, then do a verbose boot (boot -v) and
:send me the output?
Jul 29 15:00:15 hostname kernel: Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project.
Jul 29 15:00:15 hostname kernel: Copyright (c) 1979,
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Thomas Moestl wrote:
On Mon, 2003/07/28 at 09:30:08 +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
Is this caused by -oS option?
- in making BOOTMFS in make release
cc -c -Os -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes
Robert Watson wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
After upgrading last night, one of the package machines found this:
I've bumped into some similar problems -- it's a property of how we
current lock select(). We hold the file descriptor lock for the duration
of polling each
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Ok, those of you coming with panics due to kmem exhaustion w/ USB, I
have fixed another leak. For some reason I assumed that big blocks
were being deallocated upon free, not being put back on the freelist.
(Have I mentioned how much it sucks that
Hi all,
I't is my goal to make dhclient really functional, so it can not only
be used with one interface, but several.
On a well known OS this works just fine. A first interface gets
initialized and the GW gets set as usual. But if a second interface
gets added, and the first one is still
Martin Blapp wrote:
I't is my goal to make dhclient really functional, so it can not only
be used with one interface, but several.
On a well known OS this works just fine. A first interface gets
initialized and the GW gets set as usual. But if a second interface
gets added, and the first
John-Mark Gurney writes:
Gary Jennejohn wrote this message on Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 12:58 +0200:
It appears to me that the test in usb_block_allocmem() should be
(p-tag-parent == tag || p-tag-parent == tag-parent) and NOT
p-tag == tag! That's because bus_dma_tag_create() uses the tag
Hi,
I am running FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT (22.07.03)
im trying to port a software, and on compile time i get
Tools_List.hpp:51:17: new.h: No such file or directory
Leading to lots of errors afterwards i.e. :
void* operator new(unsigned int, SAPDBMem_IRawAllocator)
RTEMem_Allocator.cpp:124: no
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 11:54, Kai Mosebach wrote:
Hi,
I am running FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT (22.07.03)
im trying to port a software, and on compile time i get
Tools_List.hpp:51:17: new.h: No such file or directory
Leading to lots of errors afterwards i.e. :
void* operator new(unsigned int,
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Kai Mosebach wrote:
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:54:25 +0200
From: Kai Mosebach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: new.h is missing
Hi,
I am running FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT (22.07.03)
im trying to port a software, and on compile time i get
Hi,
I'm currently down to this patch to allow a make release to complete
for -current:
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/release/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.801
diff -u -r1.801 Makefile
--- Makefile26 Jul 2003 06:47:40 -
Tried that too, but wasnt working either.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/sapdb/src/FreeBSD/sys/src/SAPDB] # locate new|grep
include
/usr/include/c++/3.3/backward/new.h
/usr/include/c++/3.3/new
is that sufficient for g++ to find ?
regards Kai
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Michael
is it possible to give an extra argument to an $extra_commands
command? the usual call to run_rc_command
run_rc_command $1
suggests otherwise, as $1 already is the name of the command to
be executed (start, stop, etc).
would this be possible/a good idea to implement?
thx, t.
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 09:56:48AM +0200, Martin Blapp wrote:
I't is my goal to make dhclient really functional, so it can not only
be used with one interface, but several.
Yay! This bites me badly on my laptop with a permanent fxp0 and a
sometimes-present wi0.
On a well known OS this works
On Tuesday, July 29, 2003, at 5:51AM, Kai Mosebach wrote:
Tried that too, but wasnt working either.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/sapdb/src/FreeBSD/sys/src/SAPDB] # locate new|grep
include
/usr/include/c++/3.3/backward/new.h
/usr/include/c++/3.3/new
/usr/include/c++/3.3/new ought to be it.
did you try
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: David Leimbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Juli 2003 13:57
An: Kai Mosebach
Cc: 'Michael Reifenberger'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: AW: new.h is missing
On Tuesday, July 29, 2003, at 5:51AM, Kai Mosebach wrote:
Tried
Hi,
can access dhclient (or dhcpd) on the local machine without authentification.
You can get omshell working without auth over tcp/ip - I managed this
today when playing. But a unix domain socket would be nicer because the
dhclient server binds to INADDR_ANY by default.
Cool. Do you
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 06:30:54AM -0400, John wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently down to this patch to allow a make release to complete
for -current:
[...]
Try setting the KERNEL_FLAGS=-DNO_WERROR instead.
without it, the following causes BOOTMFS to abort:
cc -c -Os -pipe -Wall
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 02:00:59PM +0200, Kai Mosebach wrote:
[...]
I was wondering, that in 4.x there is a folder /usr/include/g++
where all the stuff is found, and on 5.1-CURRENT its in
/usr/include/c++/3.3, where im not sure, whether g++ uses this path
automatically ?
/usr/libexec/cc1plus
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Ruslan Ermilov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Juli 2003 14:06
An: Kai Mosebach
Cc: David Leimbach; Michael Reifenberger; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: new.h is missing
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 02:00:59PM +0200, Kai Mosebach wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 02:01:36PM +0200, Martin Blapp wrote:
can access dhclient (or dhcpd) on the local machine without authentification.
You can get omshell working without auth over tcp/ip - I managed this
today when playing. But a unix domain socket would be nicer because the
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 02:09:24PM +0200, Kai Mosebach wrote:
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Ruslan Ermilov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Juli 2003 14:06
An: Kai Mosebach
Cc: David Leimbach; Michael Reifenberger; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: new.h is
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 01:13:51PM +0200, Tobias Roth wrote:
is it possible to give an extra argument to an $extra_commands
command? the usual call to run_rc_command
run_rc_command $1
suggests otherwise, as $1 already is the name of the command to
be executed (start, stop, etc).
would
This is an automated bi-weekly mailing of the FreeBSD 5.2 open issues list.
The live version of this list is available at:
http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/5.2R/todo.html
Automated mailing of this list will continue through the release of
FreeBSD 5.2.
FreeBSD 5.2
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
Martin Blapp wrote:
I't is my goal to make dhclient really functional, so it can not only
be used with one interface, but several.
On a well known OS this works just fine. A first interface gets
initialized and the GW gets set as usual. But
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Lukas Ertl writes:
Hi there,
I'm having again problems with a highly loaded 5.1-current machine. The
box is a 2.4GHz Dual Xeon (HTT enabled) with 1GB RAM and acts as a news
server/feeder running diablo. It's
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 09:41:54AM -0400, John De Boskey wrote:
- Ruslan Ermilov's Original Message -
No, I have nothing in my environment that should affect the
build, no /etc/make.conf in the chroot area..
But then again: running make rerelease is effectively just
Someone said few weeks ago that USB-wifi is not supported at all under
FreeBSD for now.
Olivier
Le Lun 28/07/2003 17:01, Paulo Roberto a crit :
Is there any on going work for this usb network interface?
thanks
Paulo
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo!
Robert Watson wrote:
[ ... ]
If there are other ideas, I'm open to them.
You could add kevents for interface arrival and departure, and add a
kqueue to the dhcpd to catch the arrival/departure events, and then just
act on them.
Some of those events already exist for routing
Hi all, hi Clement,
I updated the rcng jail start script to mount devfs and procfs
into the jail if wanted. Adding entries to /etc/fstab didn't
work properly, because the jail filesystem wasn't mounted when
the startup process wants to mount it.
Going this way allows us to control which jail
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Jens Rehsack wrote:
I updated the rcng jail start script to mount devfs and procfs into the
jail if wanted. Adding entries to /etc/fstab didn't work properly,
because the jail filesystem wasn't mounted when the startup process
wants to mount it.
Going this way allows
You may have a device (USB camera, pen drive, hard drive, ...) that begins
to get errors like ... Synchronize cache failed, status 0x35.
If the Sync cache fails with a reasonable error code, then the code
that silence these errors should be enhanced rather than have a quirk
entry added.
Just
I am attempting to install 5.1-RELEASE. The following items appear in
the log file. This section is repeated ~15 times, and then the install
procedure moves on to the ...probing devices ... screen and never
moves on from there (of course, never is the limit if my patience ... 30
minutes).
I am
On 29.07.2003 18:47, Robert Watson wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Jens Rehsack wrote:
I updated the rcng jail start script to mount devfs and procfs into the
jail if wanted. Adding entries to /etc/fstab didn't work properly,
because the jail filesystem wasn't mounted when the startup process
wants
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
You may have a device (USB camera, pen drive, hard drive, ...) that begins
to get errors like ... Synchronize cache failed, status 0x35.
If the Sync cache fails with a reasonable error code, then the code
that silence these errors should be
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:08:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
On 29.07.2003 18:47, Robert Watson wrote:
Someone, and unfortunately I appear to have lost track of who, had some
tweaks to the rcNG scripts to set up some reasonable devfs rules for a
jail, and apply them to the devfs mounted
TB --- 2003-07-29 16:00:04 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for alpha/alpha
TB --- 2003-07-29 16:00:04 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-07-29 16:03:25 - building world
TB --- cd
[ I sent this message to pilot-link-devel and coldsync-users. I'm
trying in freebsd-current and freebsd-hardware to see if I have
better luck. -rsi ]
So I've tried everything I could to sync my Sony Clie SJ10 (PalmOS
4.0) with FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE and 5-CURRENT including setting up ppp
over
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 19:24, Rajappa Iyer wrote:
ucom0: Palm, Inc. Palm Handheld, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 2
ucom0: init failed, STALLED
device_probe_and_attach: ucom0 attach returned 6
Try this: http://www.lphp.org/popups/articleswindow.php?id=13
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
Some of those events already exist for routing sockets, so in a worst case
scenario, you can hook up a routing socket to a kqueue :-).
Martin -- you might want to try the route monitor command sometime and
take a look at the vent stream there
Antoine Jacoutot [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 19:24, Rajappa Iyer wrote:
ucom0: Palm, Inc. Palm Handheld, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 2
ucom0: init failed, STALLED
device_probe_and_attach: ucom0 attach returned 6
Try this: http://www.lphp.org/popups/articleswindow.php?id=13
On 29.07.2003 19:21, Mike Makonnen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:08:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
Yeah, I'll take care of this. I had asked scott to mail me his final
patch so I could commit it, but I never heard back from him. I'll
dig out the revisions from my mail archives and combine
Terry Lambert wrote:
Martin Blapp wrote:
I't is my goal to make dhclient really functional, so it can not only
be used with one interface, but several.
On a well known OS this works just fine. A first interface gets
initialized and the GW gets set as usual. But if a second interface
gets added,
TB --- 2003-07-29 18:31:41 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2003-07-29 18:31:41 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-07-29 18:34:24 - building world
TB --- cd
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
...
Forget what I've said about NO_WERROR, it (unfortunately) only
applies to the userland.
Still, running make rerelease KERNEL_FLAGS=WERROR= gets the
release done.
I wondered why I get it, and similarly my nigthly buildkernel
completed without
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 06:14:17AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
...
Forget what I've said about NO_WERROR, it (unfortunately) only
applies to the userland.
Still, running make rerelease KERNEL_FLAGS=WERROR= gets the
release done.
I
In the last episode (Jul 29), Ruslan Ermilov said:
Hm, I always thought that -O2 and -Os are just useful aliases that in
effect only turn a few dozens of -f optimization flags, and that
switching some of them off later is allowed. I.e., -Os
-fno-strict-aliasing should work.
That does work,
[I'm CC'ing current because this seems to have a significant negative
impact on -current kernel stability, and we can use some more data,
in particular on non-i386 SMP machines]
Thanks to Lukas Ertl and Bosko we have found a clear indication that
UMA is in fact not reentrant (enough).
The
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
You could add kevents for interface arrival and departure, and
add a kqueue to the dhcpd to catch the arrival/departure events,
and then just act on them.
Instead of just adding the stuff to devd?
Currently, devd is in the business of
From: Mike Makonnen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:08:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
Someone, and unfortunately I appear to have lost track of who, had some
tweaks to the rcNG scripts to set up some reasonable devfs rules for a
jail, and apply them to the devfs mounted in a
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
[I'm CC'ing current because this seems to have a significant negative
impact on -current kernel stability, and we can use some more data,
in particular on non-i386 SMP machines]
I just committed a workaround for this problem, until JeffR
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 06:14:17AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
...
Forget what I've said about NO_WERROR, it (unfortunately) only
applies to the userland.
Still, running make rerelease
Below is my current patch to devfs and jail to support the mounting of devfs
and procfs in jails. This patch also allows a jail to specify what devfs
rule to apply to the jail. As well as defining a default jail devfs rule
in /etc/rc.d/devfs.
Scot
Index: etc/defaults/rc.conf
Hi Folks,
I had a closer loom at the OMAPI stuff in dhclient.
Just to say, I'm very disappointed. The only objects that exist are:
control and interface. The later is not inplemented at all.
It pretends to work, but if you look at the source there are
stubs only :P.
control does only release
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 12:09:18AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
[I'm CC'ing current because this seems to have a significant negative
impact on -current kernel stability, and we can use some more data,
in particular on non-i386 SMP
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Martin Blapp wrote:
control does only release leases and exit (state 2), I never managed
to make dhclient sleep (state 3) and wake up (state 2).
Odd:
%%%
# cat /etc/sleep_dhclient
#!/bin/sh
omshell /dev/null EOF
connect
new control
open
set state = 3
update
close
EOF
#
The indication of this is that the g_bio zone does not return to
zero USED as it should.
It looks like z-uz_cachefree is slightly out of date (updated in
zone_timout() every 20th second) and often too low (not taking the
z-uz_full_bucket list into account).
The enclosed patch recalculates the
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 01:23:21AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The indication of this is that the g_bio zone does not return to
zero USED as it should.
It looks like z-uz_cachefree is slightly out of date (updated in
zone_timout() every 20th second) and often too low (not taking the
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The indication of this is that the g_bio zone does not return to
zero USED as it should.
It looks like z-uz_cachefree is slightly out of date (updated in
zone_timout() every 20th second) and often too low (not taking the
z-uz_full_bucket list
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
:
: On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
:
: You could add kevents for interface arrival and departure, and
: add a kqueue to the dhcpd to catch the arrival/departure events,
: and then just act on
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin Blapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
:
: Hi Folks,
:
: I had a closer loom at the OMAPI stuff in dhclient.
:
: Just to say, I'm very disappointed. The only objects that exist are:
: control and interface. The later is not inplemented at all.
: It
TB --- 2003-07-30 04:00:05 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for alpha/alpha
TB --- 2003-07-30 04:00:05 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-07-30 04:02:05 - building world
TB --- cd
Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
Terry Lambert wrote:
You could add kevents for interface arrival and departure, and
add a kqueue to the dhcpd to catch the arrival/departure events,
and then just act on them.
Instead of just adding the stuff to devd?
The entire dhcpd code? Isn't that what dhcpd
Robert Watson wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
You could add kevents for interface arrival and departure, and
add a kqueue to the dhcpd to catch the arrival/departure events,
and then just act on them.
Instead of just adding the stuff to devd?
Currently, devd is
Hi,
Does anyone have an idea why the umass/scsi code behave differently
between if you boot with a device already plugged in as opposed to
plugging it in later? In my case it is a Sandisk Cruiser. If I plug
it in before booting, it works just great, but if I plug it in later,
it does not want to
66 matches
Mail list logo
