On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
After building a new kernel, remote serial gdb no longer works. When
I issue a 'continue' command, I lose control of the system, but it
doesn't continue running. Has anybody else seen this?
It works as well as it did a few months ago here.
Once again our vinum build failed. This time it could do over 90% of
14 hours of work and we didn't got a panic just a hang. Only we
could do while system was printing ata error messages was to press
reset button. Difference to earlier situation is that we put back old
3c905 xl-card and removed
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Kevin Oberman wrote:
ACPI attaches the bus twice. See sys/dev/acpica/acpi.c:
Thanks. That explains why I get the message twice, but why do I get it
at all when the device is disabled in the device.hints file?
Dunno. That's
On 2003-09-29 13:33:06 (-0700), Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Kevin Oberman wrote:
From: John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 29-Sep-2003 Kevin Oberman wrote:
I recently noticed that, when I boot with ACPI on my IBM T30, I get
errors trying to probe the BIOS
On Tuesday, 30 September 2003 at 16:23:35 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
After building a new kernel, remote serial gdb no longer works. When
I issue a 'continue' command, I lose control of the system, but it
doesn't continue running. Has anybody
My troublesome system uses an Adaptec Serial ATA RAID 1210SA which has the
SiI3112 RAID chip. I have only one drive connected, so no RAID functionality.
Here is my verbose dmesg using the 9/28/03 snapshot:
http://www.computinginnovations.com/dmesg.html
-Derek
At 12:38 PM 9/29/2003
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thorsten Greiner writes
:
Hi,
inspired by the recent posting of the gbde tutorial I went out and
set up an encrypted partition using geom_bde on my laptop. When
trying to umount this partition the umount fails with:
# umount /crypto
umount: unmount of
Hi Derek Ragona,
you wrote.
DR My troublesome system uses an Adaptec Serial ATA RAID 1210SA which has the
DR SiI3112 RAID chip. I have only one drive connected, so no RAID functionality.
DR Here is my verbose dmesg using the 9/28/03 snapshot:
DR http://www.computinginnovations.com/dmesg.html
* Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Did you call gbde detach before the umount ?
No.
You need to unmount first.
Yes, that's what I tried. I then get the fsync: giving up on dirty
message. When I shut down the box, it tries to sync the dirty
buffers and finally says giving up on 2
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Tuesday, 30 September 2003 at 16:23:35 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
After building a new kernel, remote serial gdb no longer works. When
I issue a 'continue' command, I lose control of the
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
Are you running seti, rc4, etc? Any programs that sit in the background
and consume 100% of the cpu?
I'm running KDE (using libc_r), and run setiathome and/or dnetc in the
background. I've also tried killing the background tasks, but it makes
little
Hi,
I don't understand why boot/device.hints are installed with
distribute target instead distribution, in the Makefile:
# $FreeBSD: src/etc/Makefile,v 1.313 2003/05/06 07:25:17 dougb Exp $
I build FreeBSD-4.8 with a shell script near like this:
export DESTDIR=/usr/src/dest/fbsd-48
Hello
My questoin is about status of wicontrol TX power control in current ?
Anybody planing to commit it into wicontrol ?
I use modified patch from imp for three months
it works well, but problem is, that if card is reseted by wi_reset - i
guess,
value from register is owerwrited by default (I
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 07:24:48PM -0700, Lars Eggert wrote:
Bernd,
Bernd Walter wrote:
What does USB_DEBUG with hw.usb.debug=2 and hw.usb.ugen.debug=2 say?
it says this:
usbd_setup_pipe: dev=0xc3f9d980 iface=0xc3efbaa0 ep=0xc3f192c8
pipe=0xdb936974
ugenwrite: transfer 5 bytes
It just seems that there are alot of issues w/ 4.9, doesn't seem stable at
all.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bernd Walter wrote:
Can you please do this again with additionaly hw.usb.ohci.debug=10 set.
error=13 makes me believe that this could be a OHCI driver problem.
Here you go:
Sep 30 08:49:49 host192 kernel: usbd_setup_pipe: dev=0xc3f66c00
iface=0xc3ee5e80 ep=0xc3eee458 pipe=0xdd0a3974
Sep 30
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:52:05AM -0400, Eriq Lamar wrote:
It just seems that there are alot of issues w/ 4.9, doesn't seem stable at
all.
The answer is probably no. Of course, your vague statement
about 4.9 not being stable makes it hard to judge whether 5.1
is a better choice than 4.9.
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 04:01 am, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Tuesday, 30 September 2003 at 16:23:35 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
After building a new kernel, remote serial gdb no longer works.
John,
[...]
: Julian and Ruslan are busy at the moment. M. Warner Losh has sent
e-mail
: to core@ and asked for commit bit for me. in the mean time i'd like to
: commit this and resolve all issues in time for 5.2-RELEASE.
:
: I can give it a go if no one else wants to do it.
Hello All,
I set up a box
(FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Tue Sep 23 00:21:31 CEST 2003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC,
compiled from the sources the day before)
showing the erratic behaviour. Verbose boot logs are available at
http://cheasy.dyndns.org/bootlogs/ .
If anybody
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 10:51:56PM +0200, John Hay wrote:
i see, is that a problem? i can clean up the patch and remove these entries.
(frankly i thought CVS should take care of it).
I don't think it will break cvs, it might just cause some extra bloat.
Maybe just get rid of those parts
From: Eriq Lamar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:52:05 -0400
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It just seems that there are alot of issues w/ 4.9, doesn't seem stable at
all.
Yes, but there are a lot of issues in 5.1, too. And some are the same
ones. The ATAng issues are hitting both
In my continuing quest to figure out what's wrong with ACPI in -CURRENT
on my laptop, I've tried going back to the old ata drivers (worked, but
made no difference), ended up blowing my computer up (weird fsck problem
crept in), went back to 5.1, moved up to -CURRENT again, and started
plugging
I have now found a way to reproduce the DMA problems some setups seems
to be having with the SiI3112A SATA chip.
Now, if I use real SATA drives, (and I mean real SATA drives, the
WD Raptor fx is not a real SATA device but just a PATA device
with a build in PATA-SATA converter chip) it works just
Sam Leffler writes:
It reliably locks up for me when you break into a running system; set a
breakpoint; and then continue. Machine is UP+HTT. Haven't tried other
machines.
Perhaps related, perhaps a red-herring: With a single P4 + HTT, +
SMP kernel, if I break into the ddb debugger
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 10:06:40PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
I have now found a way to reproduce the DMA problems some setups seems
to be having with the SiI3112A SATA chip.
Now, if I use real SATA drives, (and I mean real SATA drives, the
WD Raptor fx is not a real SATA device but just a
I have been getting a similar panic for several weeks
now. I cvsup-ed and built a new kernel yesterday
(9/29) and it still doesn't see it. This is with a
SIS 630 chipset UDMA controller.
--- Tilman Linneweh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Updated my -CURRENT yesterday and got the following
It seems Will Andrews wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 10:06:40PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
I have now found a way to reproduce the DMA problems some setups seems
to be having with the SiI3112A SATA chip.
Now, if I use real SATA drives, (and I mean real SATA drives, the
WD Raptor fx is
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 10:22:33PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
No what I mean is that the Raptor is a PATA device fitted with a
marvell PATA-SATA converter on board, its not a pure SATA
design, but just the old stuff they used to make with the marvell
chip kludged on the back :)
The power
It seems Will Andrews wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 10:22:33PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
No what I mean is that the Raptor is a PATA device fitted with a
marvell PATA-SATA converter on board, its not a pure SATA
design, but just the old stuff they used to make with the marvell
chip
* Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-30 10:54]:
Did you call gbde detach before the umount ? You need to unmount
first.
After investigating further I think I have found the reason for the
problem. When I created the disklabel for the partition I was lazy
and entered a size of 200
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thorsten Greiner writes:
* Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-30 10:54]:
Did you call gbde detach before the umount ? You need to unmount
first.
After investigating further I think I have found the reason for the
problem. When I created the disklabel for
Great news to hear Søren.
Do you know when a snapshot with the fix will be available? Since I cannot
complete a buildworld using the SATA drive without the fix.
Thanks for the fix.
-Derek
At 10:06 PM 9/30/2003 +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
I have now found a way to reproduce the DMA
I'm not sure what's causing these ACPI problems in this recent -CURRENT,
but I've found where it's hanging. It's on this line:
as = AcpiEvaluateObject(h, _BIF, NULL, bif_buffer);
in acpi_cmbat.c in sys/dev/acpica/. The function AcpiEvaluateObject is
found in contrib/dev/acpica/nsxfeval.c, which
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 10:04:42PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote:
I'm not convinced this is the right direction to move in. The problem
is that users are beginning to expect that pseudo-interfaces be created
with network interface cloning, but tun, tap, and vmnet aren't. I'm
Same about ef(4)
Due to an electrician flipping the wrong circuit breaker this morning, I
had my servers go down hard ... they are all -STABLE, with one of the four
taking a *very* long time to fsck:
jupiter# ps aux | grep fsck
root 361 99.0 2.3 95572 95508 p0 R+4:21PM 121:13.21 fsck -y /dev/da0s1h
Please do not start new threads for the same problem as it makes it hard
to track down what your problem even was originally. I assume your
problem is hangs during boot, it appeared since 5.1R, and it goes away if
you enable options INVARIANTS. Is that right?
-Nate
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Jeremy Bingham wrote:
On 23/09/03 18:07 -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
Enable options DDB. When it hangs, press CTRL-ALT-ESC and then tr to
get a traceback.
While ACPI influences this problem, I am uncertain it is the root cause.
-Nate
Way ahead of you there. I
On 30/09/03 14:48 -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
Please do not start new threads for the same problem as it makes it hard
to track down what your problem even was originally. I assume your
problem is hangs during boot, it appeared since 5.1R, and it goes away if
you enable options INVARIANTS. Is
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Jeremy Bingham wrote:
On 30/09/03 14:48 -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
Please do not start new threads for the same problem as it makes it hard
to track down what your problem even was originally. I assume your
problem is hangs during boot, it appeared since 5.1R, and it
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 18:42:21 -0300 (ADT)
From: Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Due to an electrician flipping the wrong circuit breaker this morning, I
had my servers go down hard ... they are all -STABLE, with one of the four
taking a *very* long time to
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:35:34PM +0200, Pawel Malachowski wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 10:04:42PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote:
I'm not convinced this is the right direction to move in. The problem
is that users are beginning to expect that pseudo-interfaces be created
with network
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Current has two major changes re speeding up fsck.
The most significant is the background operation of fsck on file system
with soft updates enabled. Because of the way softupdates works, you are
assured of metadata consistency on reboot, so the
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Now,I don't/wouldn't have softupdates enabled on / .. does the 'background
fsck' know to not background if softupdates are not enabled?
Yes, this is no problem, if the FS doesn't have SU, it just checks it the
old way. Since / is usually rather
On Sep 30, 2003, at 3:30 PM, Soren Schmidt wrote:
It seems Will Andrews wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 10:22:33PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
No what I mean is that the Raptor is a PATA device fitted with a
marvell PATA-SATA converter on board, its not a pure SATA
design, but just the old stuff
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 01:04:51AM +0200, Lukas Ertl wrote:
are either of these enhancements back-patchable to the 4.x fsck, or do
they require some non-4.x compatible changes to work?
It's not just the fsck application itself, background fsck basically needs
file system snapshots, which
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 06:15:58PM -0500, David Leimbach wrote:
Yeah... I feel somewhat betrayed. Time to switch to a different drive
brand :)
I should have bought a Maxtor 10K III U160 SCSI drive instead. :)
Getting an appropriate controller would have been more expensive,
but the drive's
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote:
are either of these enhancements back-patchable to the 4.x fsck, or do
they require some non-4.x compatible changes to work?
It's not just the fsck application itself, background fsck basically needs
file system snapshots, which are only available on
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 04:44:30PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 20:28:20 -0300 (ADT)
From: Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote:
are either of these enhancements back-patchable to the 4.x fsck, or do
they require some
Lukas Ertl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not just the fsck application itself, background fsck basically needs
file system snapshots, which are only available on UFS2, and I'm not sure
if they can be backported to UFS1 at all.
Huh? Snapshots are available for both UFS1 and UFS2, but only on
Here are iostat 5 results for my USB thumb drive on a uhci(4) controller
with 5.1-CURRENT. On windows on the same box, it runs reasonably quickly.
On FreeBSD, it really lags. This is for a cp of a large file to a
msdosfs-mounted flash drive.
da0
KB/t tps MB/s
1.07 41 0.04
1.00 41
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Current has two major changes re speeding up fsck.
The most significant is the background operation of fsck on file system
with soft updates enabled. Because of the way softupdates works, you are
assured of metadata consistency on reboot, so
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Basically:
1. Do not call makedev().
2. If you do cloning, please look at the patches I posted
for if_tun/if_tap for how to do it.
show an actual document please, explaining how this works from the
user's POV..
On Tuesday, 30 September 2003 at 16:13:09 -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Sam Leffler writes:
It reliably locks up for me when you break into a running system; set a
breakpoint; and then continue. Machine is UP+HTT. Haven't tried other
machines.
Perhaps related, perhaps a red-herring:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: So now I wonder if there is any magic constant which the slice size
: needs to be a multiple of...?
:
: Not that I know off.
Actually, there is, but it isn't constant. slices need to be an even
number of
I'm working on getting the AFS client to work under FreeBSD. I just
compiled a -current kernel with DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS, and before I could
even load the AFS module I had the system stop with the following
locking assertion:
getdirtybuf: 0xc2678000 interlock is not locked but should be
Backtrace
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
Here are iostat 5 results for my USB thumb drive on a uhci(4) controller
with 5.1-CURRENT. On windows on the same box, it runs reasonably quickly.
On FreeBSD, it really lags. This is for a cp of a large file to a
msdosfs-mounted flash drive.
57 matches
Mail list logo
