Re: Random signals in {build,install}world recently?

2003-10-28 Thread Vallo Kallaste
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 02:46:03PM -0500, Andre Guibert de Bruet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Vallo Kallaste wrote: I went back to last known good kernel/world combination, which is from September 16. The next and problematic kernel/world pair is from September 30. So

5.1 - stl Kernel compile fails

2003-10-28 Thread Karl M. Joch
i added a stallion easy i/o to a 5.1 box. compiling the kernel fails with a lot of errors in stallion.c. any chance that this gets corrected soon? -- Best regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen, Karl M. Joch http://www.freebsd.at - Das Power Betriebssystem

Re: 5.1 - stl Kernel compile fails

2003-10-28 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 08:11:33AM +0100, Karl M. Joch wrote: i added a stallion easy i/o to a 5.1 box. compiling the kernel fails with a lot of errors in stallion.c. any chance that this gets corrected soon? Post the errors you're seeing so we don't have to guess. Kris pgp0.pgp

5.1-p10 lockups

2003-10-28 Thread Branko F. Grac(nar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Last days i'm having big troubles with my 5.1-p10 box. It's dual p3 1.2MHz, 1G of ecc ram with 900G on pst0 raid5 disk array. Kernel configuration is attached. My problems are lockups when i test apache (2.0.47, php 4.3.3 + turck mmcache and horde

Re: ULE page fault with sched_ule.c 1.67

2003-10-28 Thread Eirik Oeverby
Hi, Jeff Roberson wrote: On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Jonathan Fosburgh wrote: On Monday 27 October 2003 12:06 pm, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote: Hi, I just cvsupped and built a new kernel that includes sched_ule.c 1.67. I'm getting a page fault when working in Mozilla Firebird. It happens pretty soon,

GL slowdown with latest kernel

2003-10-28 Thread Yuri Khotyaintsev
I see a ~3x reduced GL performance as measured by glxgears. This is on a dual Athlon sysmem with Radeon 9000 Pro. Old kernel: [EMAIL PROTECTED] uname -a FreeBSD ice.irfu.se 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #3: Wed Oct 22 10:15:08 CEST 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/ICE

Re: Anyone object to the following change in libc?

2003-10-28 Thread Harti Brandt
(Cc set to current). On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Jordan K Hubbard wrote: JKHBack in the pre-panther timeframe, we received the following bug report: JKH JKHEarlier versions of Mac OS X (e.g., 10.2.6) return a value of -1 with JKHthe following program: JKH JKH#include stdlib.h JKH JKHmain() JKH{ int

Still gettnig NFS client locking up

2003-10-28 Thread Matt
I'm now running a kernel/world of October 26th on both NFS client and server machines. I am still seeing NFS lockups as reported by several people in these threads: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1296172+0+archive/2003/freebsd-current/20031026.freebsd-current

Re: Still gettnig NFS client locking up

2003-10-28 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Matt wrote: I'm now running a kernel/world of October 26th on both NFS client and server machines. I am still seeing NFS lockups as reported by several people in these threads:

Re: Radeon 7500 w/ DRI locking on restart of X

2003-10-28 Thread Eric Anholt
On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 11:06, Sean Welch wrote: Eric, I updated my 5.1-RELEASE system to CURRENT dated today at approx. 9:10 CDT to give your changes a try. I had a bit of a fright at first with kernel panics right at the end of the boot sequence but it turned out I had forgotten to disable

Re: 5.1 - stl Kernel compile fails

2003-10-28 Thread Karl M. Joch
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 08:11:33AM +0100, Karl M. Joch wrote: i added a stallion easy i/o to a 5.1 box. compiling the kernel fails with a lot of errors in stallion.c. any chance that this gets corrected soon? Post the errors you're seeing so we don't have to guess. Kris

Re: Repeatable panic from 'camcontrol devlist'

2003-10-28 Thread Thomas Quinot
* Greg 'groggy' Lehey, 2003-10-27 : I'm running a -CURRENT kernel built about a week ago, and on 'camcontrol devlist' I get the following repeatable panic: Fixed in vfs_bio.c rev. 1.418. Thomas. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: atapicam related panic

2003-10-28 Thread Thomas Quinot
* Stuart Walsh, 2003-10-18 : I have an easily reproducable panic when using atapicam. Vague trace This has nothing to do whatsoever with ATAPI/CAM! this is an inconsistency between cam_periph.c and vfs_bio.c, you need to update the latter to rev. 1.418 or newer. Thomas. -- [EMAIL

Forward: HEADS UP! Default value of ip6_v6only changed

2003-10-28 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, Our default of net.inet6.ip6.v6only was off in 4.X, and was changed to on on 5.X to follow NetBSD's practice. This behavior on 5.X breaks RFC2553/3493, and the change was intentional from security consideration. But, NetBSD changed it off by default. How do you think our default of on?

Re: GBDE performance on ZIP disks

2003-10-28 Thread Stefan Walter
Robert Watson, 28.10.03, 03:26h CET: [...slow gbde encrypted ZIP disk...] How do things look performance-wise if you do a raw sector read comparison with dd at various blocksizes? My recollection is that our msdos code Here are a few numbers (for reading - the ones for writing don't really

Re: Anyone object to the following change in libc?

2003-10-28 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Harti Brandt wrote: (Cc set to current). On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Jordan K Hubbard wrote: JKHBack in the pre-panther timeframe, we received the following bug report: JKH JKHEarlier versions of Mac OS X (e.g., 10.2.6) return a value of -1 with JKHthe following program:

Re: Anyone object to the following change in libc?

2003-10-28 Thread Harti Brandt
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote: DEOn Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Harti Brandt wrote: DE DE DE (Cc set to current). DE DE On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Jordan K Hubbard wrote: DE DE JKHBack in the pre-panther timeframe, we received the following bug report: DE JKH DE JKHEarlier versions of Mac OS X (e.g.,

Re: Forward: HEADS UP! Default value of ip6_v6only changed

2003-10-28 Thread Jeff W. Boote
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: Hi, Our default of net.inet6.ip6.v6only was off in 4.X, and was changed to on on 5.X to follow NetBSD's practice. This behavior on 5.X breaks RFC2553/3493, and the change was intentional from security consideration. But, NetBSD changed it off by default. How do

Re: GL slowdown with latest kernel

2003-10-28 Thread Barney Wolff
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 09:39:28AM +0100, Yuri Khotyaintsev wrote: I see a ~3x reduced GL performance as measured by glxgears. This is on a dual Athlon sysmem with Radeon 9000 Pro. I don't see a slowdown with a dual Athlon and Radeon 7500. Also, mouse is much smoother with glxgears in

Re: Anyone object to the following change in libc?

2003-10-28 Thread Richard Tobin
I think ISO-C is pretty clear here. It would be wise to raise this on comp.std.c which is read by several of the ISO C standard authors. Things that seem pretty clear often turn out not to be... -- Richard ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: Random signals in {build,install}world recently?

2003-10-28 Thread Barney Wolff
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 09:01:35AM +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote: Well, I have a system from the 25th that works just fine, we're looking between the dates of 9/25 - 9/30. It is fixed, grab newer sources. It seems mostly but not completely fixed. I got one sig11 (on touch :) building

Instant panic when trying to unload nvidia.ko

2003-10-28 Thread Miguel Mendez
Hi, I'm running -CURRENT from yesterday. In a futile attempt to make some use of my rusty RivaTNT card, I installed the nvidia kernel port, but it seems to be doing some weird stuff with memory. This appeared in the messages log: ... Oct 28 16:04:33 scienide kernel: malloc() of 32 with the

Re: Anyone object to the following change in libc?

2003-10-28 Thread Stefan Farfeleder
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 04:07:13PM +, Richard Tobin wrote: I think ISO-C is pretty clear here. It would be wise to raise this on comp.std.c which is read by several of the ISO C standard authors. Things that seem pretty clear often turn out not to be... This topic is discussed almost

Re: __fpclassifyd problem

2003-10-28 Thread Doug White
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, David Schultz wrote: I'm just catching up on -CURRENT, but I wanted to point out that this was fixed last night in: src/lib/msun/src/e_scalbf.c,v1.8 src/lib/msun/src/e_scalb.c,v1.10 The fix was to use the old versions of isnan() and isinf() specifically in

Re: 5.1-p10 lockups

2003-10-28 Thread Doug White
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, [ISO-8859-1] Branko F. Grac(nar wrote: Last days i'm having big troubles with my 5.1-p10 box. It's dual p3 1.2MHz, 1G of ecc ram with 900G on pst0 raid5 disk array. Kernel configuration is attached. My problems are lockups when i test apache (2.0.47, php 4.3.3 + turck

Re: UFS file system problem in either stable or current

2003-10-28 Thread Wes Peters
On Tuesday 28 October 2003 08:42 am, Dan Strick wrote: On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 06:23:20 -0500, Peter Schultz wrote: Dan Strick wrote: There seems to be an inconsistency between release 4.9-RC and 5.1 ufs support. If I fsck the same ufs (type 1 of course) file system on both releases, each

Re: 5.1 - stl Kernel compile fails

2003-10-28 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:21:09PM +0100, Karl M. Joch wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 08:11:33AM +0100, Karl M. Joch wrote: i added a stallion easy i/o to a 5.1 box. compiling the kernel fails with a lot of errors in stallion.c. any chance that this gets corrected

[current tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

2003-10-28 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-10-28 17:00:00 - tinderbox 2.2 running on cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org TB --- 2003-10-28 17:00:00 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2003-10-28 17:00:00 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q

kernel hangs with SMP/Hyperthreading

2003-10-28 Thread Bernhard Valenti
hi, i built a kernel with APIC_IO and SMP for my p4 with hyperthreading. when i try to boot the kernel it hangs during boot at: APIC_IO: Testing 8254 interrupt delivery doing while (read_intr_count(8) 6) ; /* nothing */ (sys/i386/isa/clock.c:1030) read_intr_count(8) returns 0

sound LOR patches

2003-10-28 Thread Mathew Kanner
Hello All, I tried to fix some LOR in -current and attached you will find some patches. I sent these to the -sound list but I didn't get a response. (Maybe I should mention that I'm also part of the -sound list). So now I don't know what's going in with sound and -current.

Re: kernel hangs with SMP/Hyperthreading

2003-10-28 Thread Scott Long
Hi, There is a discussion going on about strange interactions between the boot menu and SMP that sounds very much like what you describe. FOr a workaround, at the boot menu, select option 6, then type 'boot' at the prompt. Scott On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Bernhard Valenti wrote: hi, i built a

Re: 5.1 - stl Kernel compile fails

2003-10-28 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 08:11:33AM +0100, Karl M. Joch wrote: i added a stallion easy i/o to a 5.1 box. compiling the kernel fails with a lot of errors in stallion.c. any chance that this gets corrected soon? Is this an ISA or PCI card? ___ [EMAIL

Re: newfs by fstab directory name?

2003-10-28 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 01:26:23PM -0800, Wes Peters wrote: At work we do a lot of dynamic filesystem creation, so we added the ability to specify the 'special file' argument to newfs via the fstab mount point directory. Please see the attached patch. If nobody objects, I'll commit this

Re: ULE page fault with sched_ule.c 1.67

2003-10-28 Thread Arjan van Leeuwen
On Monday 27 October 2003 23:31, Jeff Roberson wrote: On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Jonathan Fosburgh wrote: On Monday 27 October 2003 12:06 pm, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote: Hi, I just cvsupped and built a new kernel that includes sched_ule.c 1.67. I'm getting a page fault when working in

LOR

2003-10-28 Thread Dmitry Sivachenko
Hello! When I establish a dialup link with my ISP using ppp(8), I get the following LOR (very recent -current): lock order reversal 1st 0xc47ab790 rtentry (rtentry) @ /usr/src/sys/net/rtsock.c:388 2nd 0xc442367c radix node head (radix node head) @ /usr/src/sys/net/route.c:133 Stack backtrace:

Another ATAng failure.

2003-10-28 Thread David Gilbert
I have tried several times in recent days to burn DVDs with burncd, growisofs and cdrecord ... all of which worked before atang. Growisofs complains that it can't flush it's buffers. Burncd doesn't complain ... but the resulting disk is not mountable. I thought at one point that some DVD images

page fault in propagate_priority

2003-10-28 Thread Dan Nelson
I've gotten the following panic twice in the last few days. I'm pretty sure truss has something to do with it, since I just started trussing something when it paniced. No crashdumps unfortunately, and the system locks up hard so I have to reset it. The fault address is 0x24 so it looks like a

OpenLDAP/nss_ldap/pam_ldap

2003-10-28 Thread Steve Lee
Question ? I am using FreeBSD 5.1 I have a linux server with openldap running on it authenticating Solaris and Linux box and now FreeBSD 5.1 I have gotten FreeBSD 5.1 to authenticate user remotely ssh ing to the box. They can log in, but when they log in, the system shows their userid

RE: page fault in propagate_priority

2003-10-28 Thread John Baldwin
On 28-Oct-2003 Dan Nelson wrote: I've gotten the following panic twice in the last few days. I'm pretty sure truss has something to do with it, since I just started trussing something when it paniced. No crashdumps unfortunately, and the system locks up hard so I have to reset it. The

Re: newfs by fstab directory name?

2003-10-28 Thread Wes Peters
On Tuesday 28 October 2003 12:05, David O'Brien wrote: On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 01:26:23PM -0800, Wes Peters wrote: At work we do a lot of dynamic filesystem creation, so we added the ability to specify the 'special file' argument to newfs via the fstab mount point directory. Please see the

Re: OpenLDAP/nss_ldap/pam_ldap

2003-10-28 Thread Timur I. Bakeyev
Hi, Steve! On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:52:51PM -0800, Steve Lee wrote: Question ? I am using FreeBSD 5.1 I have gotten FreeBSD 5.1 to authenticate user remotely ssh ing to the box. They can log in, but when they log in, the system shows their userid instead of the username when you

Re: OpenLDAP/nss_ldap/pam_ldap

2003-10-28 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Tuesday 28 October 2003 23:52, Steve Lee wrote: I have gotten FreeBSD 5.1 to authenticate user remotely ssh ing to the box. They can log in, but when they log in, the system shows their userid instead of the username when you do a ps. this tells me something might be wrong with

Re: newfs by fstab directory name?

2003-10-28 Thread Scott W
Wes Peters wrote: On Tuesday 28 October 2003 12:05, David O'Brien wrote: On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 01:26:23PM -0800, Wes Peters wrote: At work we do a lot of dynamic filesystem creation, so we added the ability to specify the 'special file' argument to newfs via the fstab mount point

buildworld fails with with de_AT locale

2003-10-28 Thread Bernhard Valenti
hi, a buildworld with a de_AT locale fails in src/lib/libedit, the file fcnl.h that gets created is broken. i found that problem in the mailing list(april this year), and wonder if this has still not been fixed? regards, bernhard ___ [EMAIL

Re: OpenLDAP/nss_ldap/pam_ldap

2003-10-28 Thread Steve Lee
Sorry for my ignorance, i am new to FreeBSD. i have tried to use it in the past ( 2years ago ) but decided to wait to till the nss_ldap support was added for nsswitch so i can use openldap. Now, when you say rebuild, how would i rebuild FreeBSD dynamically, or are you saying to rebuild the

Re: page fault in propagate_priority

2003-10-28 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Oct 28), John Baldwin said: On 28-Oct-2003 Dan Nelson wrote: I've gotten the following panic twice in the last few days. I'm pretty sure truss has something to do with it, since I just started trussing something when it paniced. No crashdumps unfortunately, and the

[current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2003-10-28 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-10-29 00:12:38 - tinderbox 2.2 running on cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org TB --- 2003-10-29 00:12:38 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2003-10-29 00:12:38 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q

Re: Forward: HEADS UP! Default value of ip6_v6only changed

2003-10-28 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Hajimu UMEMOTO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Our default of net.inet6.ip6.v6only was off in 4.X, and was changed to on on 5.X to follow NetBSD's practice. This behavior on 5.X breaks RFC2553/3493, and the change was intentional from security consideration. But, NetBSD changed it off by default.

Re: OpenLDAP/nss_ldap/pam_ldap

2003-10-28 Thread Bill Moran
Steve Lee wrote: Sorry for my ignorance, i am new to FreeBSD. i have tried to use it in the past ( 2years ago ) but decided to wait to till the nss_ldap support was added for nsswitch so i can use openldap. Now, when you say rebuild, how would i rebuild FreeBSD dynamically, or are you saying to

panic route.c:565

2003-10-28 Thread Jiri Mikulas
FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #3: Tue Oct 28 23:51:52 CET 2003 ~~~cut~~~ recursed on non-recursive lock (sleep mutex) rtentry @ /usr/src/sys/net/route.c:565 first acquired @ /usr/src/sys/net/route.c:182 panic: recurse ~~~cut~~~ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: ethercons: ethernet console driver for 5-current

2003-10-28 Thread arnvid
Terry Lambert writes: If Linux is using 0x0666, we should probably pick a different number since we're not wire compatible. Though coming up with a common protocol would be even better. 0x666 hex is 1638 decimal, and it's taken: cnip1638/tcp CableNet Info Protocol cnip

problems with sysinstall

2003-10-28 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
The first one: when I install -current on disk where WinXP on first slice, sysinstall brakes WinXP boot complete. I got 'Missing operation system' everytime. Even I've tried 'fixboot' and reinstall WinXP. Helps only 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad0 count=100' and reinstall WinXP on clean disk.

Re: panic route.c:565

2003-10-28 Thread Sam Leffler
On Tuesday 28 October 2003 04:40 pm, Jiri Mikulas wrote: FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #3: Tue Oct 28 23:51:52 CET 2003 ~~~cut~~~ recursed on non-recursive lock (sleep mutex) rtentry @ /usr/src/sys/net/route.c:565 first acquired @ /usr/src/sys/net/route.c:182 panic: recurse ~~~cut~~~ Any chance you

Re: Anyone object to the following change in libc?

2003-10-28 Thread Terry Lambert
Harti Brandt wrote: When applying %*d%d to the string 123 the first 'd' format matches the string 123 and the conversion yields the number 123. This is then thrown away because assignment is suppressed. The next format specified finds an EOF condition on the stream so this counts as an input

Re: Radeon 7500 w/ DRI locking on restart of X

2003-10-28 Thread Sean Welch
Okay. I won't worry about the messages then. I mentioned the suspend/resume problem only because it actually worked correctly when using option ForcePCIMode; I was shocked when it did and was hoping that your fix for AGP accelerated DRI would pull off the same trick. I should note here that I

Re: UFS file system problem in either stable or current

2003-10-28 Thread Dan Strick
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 06:23:20 -0500, Peter Schultz wrote: Dan Strick wrote: There seems to be an inconsistency between release 4.9-RC and 5.1 ufs support. If I fsck the same ufs (type 1 of course) file system on both releases, each claims that the other has left incorrect summary data in

[current tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

2003-10-28 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-10-29 05:00:00 - tinderbox 2.2 running on cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org TB --- 2003-10-29 05:00:00 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2003-10-29 05:00:00 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q