Alexander Motin wrote:
YAMAMOTO, Taku wrote:
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:07:38 +0300
Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
(snip)
So, what else did you do to reduce interrupts so much?
Ah, I think I see it now. My desktop has only C1 enabled. Is that it?
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:11:48 +0200
Gary Jennejohn gljennj...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:07:38 +0300
Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
Hmm. I applied your patches and am now running the new kernel. But I
only installed the new kernel and
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:11:48 +0200
Gary Jennejohn gljennj...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:07:38 +0300
Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
Hmm. I applied your patches and am now running the new kernel. But I
only installed
On Monday, August 30, 2010 5:53:43 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 30/08/2010 20:18 Mike Tancsa said the following:
At 12:51 PM 8/30/2010, Olivier Smedts wrote:
By any chance, is it disabled in BIOS ?
Hi,
There are a couple of options in the BIOS. There is a reboot the box if the
bios
On Monday, August 30, 2010 6:22:10 pm Xin LI wrote:
On 2010/08/27 06:34, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, August 26, 2010 8:50:01 pm Xin LI wrote:
Hi,
The attached patch changes FreeBSD/x86 back to FreeBSD/i386 on i386 and
FreeBSD/amd64 on amd64.
Comments welcome! I'll commit it in
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:11:48 +0200
Gary Jennejohn gljennj...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:07:38 +0300
Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
Hmm. I
I recorded the stack any time ts-ts_cpu was set and when a thread was
migrated by sched_switch() I printed out the recorded info. Here's
what I found:
XXX bug 67957: moving 0xff003ff9b800 from 3 to 1
[1]: pin 0 state 4 move 3 - 1 done by 0xff000cc44000:
#0 0x802b36b4 at
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:16 AM, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
I recorded the stack any time ts-ts_cpu was set and when a thread was
migrated by sched_switch() I printed out the recorded info. Here's
what I found:
XXX bug 67957: moving 0xff003ff9b800 from 3 to 1
[1]: pin 0 state 4 move 3 -
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:07:38 +0300
Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Yes, as I have said, at this moment empty ticks skipped only while CPU
is in C2/C3 states. In C1 state there is no way to handle lost events on
wake up. While it may be not very dangerous, it is
Jilles Tjoelker jil...@stack.nl writes:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:04:16PM +0300, Jaakko Heinonen wrote:
On 2010-06-15, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
- The iconv.h header files is supposed to be compatible with the GNU
version, i.e. sources should build with base iconv.h and GNU libiconv.
I've
Hello.
I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
mad, you can stop here.
The patchset is very experimental. It can eat your cookie and hurt your
teddy bear, so be warned. Don't try it for anything except testing.
This patchset is also a message we, as the FreeBSD
Hi,
The DTrace userland project is near completion and you can start using parts of
it right away (only on FreeBSD HEAD right now).
For more information on how to use DTrace with userland, please read:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/DTrace/userland
This project is being sponsored by the FreeBSD
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hello.
I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
mad, you can stop here.
Woohoo! Thanks for all your hard work on this!
Matt
___
On 1 September 2010 10:21, Rui Paulo rpa...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
The DTrace userland project is near completion and you can start using parts
of it right away (only on FreeBSD HEAD right now).
For more information on how to use DTrace with userland, please read:
This is awesome. Thank you!
-J
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hello.
I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
mad, you can stop here.
The patchset is very experimental. It can eat your cookie and hurt your
teddy
Hi,
I just upgraded from r210042 to r212073 and keep getting the panic
introduced in r211317:
panic: tcp_output: len = tso_segsz
db:0:kdb.enter.default bt
Tracing pid 12 tid 100063 td 0xff001881b000
kdb_enter() at kdb_enter+0x3d
panic() at panic+0x1c8
tcp_output() at tcp_output+0x1445
Pawel,
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
mad, you can stop here.
The patchset is very experimental. It can eat your cookie and hurt your
teddy bear, so be warned. Don't try it for anything except testing.
Thank you very much -
Infiniband is currently being worked on, sponsored by Panasas, Isilon
and someone else. It's coming along pretty well.
http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/ZFS-as-a-Linux-kernel-module-1069056.html
Too bad FreeBSD still lacks Infiniband support. Currently we use ZFS
on FreeBSD and
That's cool. Thank you for your work on it.
best regards,
hanzhu
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hello.
I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
mad, you can stop here.
The patchset is very experimental. It can eat
Cool, but i may try this on a VM and maybe try this on a expermential
production system after I test it on VM since a real system may help
the progress of the new ZFS sinc
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Zhu Han schumi@gmail.com wrote:
That's cool. Thank you for your work on it.
best
20 matches
Mail list logo
