Re: HEADS UP: Removal of libobjc from the base system

2011-04-18 Thread Scott Long
On Apr 17, 2011, at 12:33 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: Yeah it's too outdated to be of any use. IMHO, you can axe libf2c too... Honest question here, is there a newer version of libf2c that lives in ports and is adopted by people who use fortran? The one that I find in the base system

Re: ukbs

2011-04-18 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Sunday 17 April 2011 20:43:15 Armin Pirkovitsch wrote: Hi! Out of curiousity - is currently someone working on ukbd? No. --HPS ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To

Re: `hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature' disappeared

2011-04-18 Thread John Baldwin
On Saturday, April 16, 2011 11:51:22 am Nick Ulen wrote: FreeBSD was successfully upgraded. uname -v FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0: Mon Apr 11 18:14:36 MSD 2011 root@test:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Everything seems to be working well except `hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature' disappeared

Re: `hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature' disappeared

2011-04-18 Thread David Wolfskill
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 08:05:40AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: ... output from: sysctl -a |grep acpi is here: https://privatepaste.com/ca08d4658b I suspect it is still there, but sysctl doesn't know how to display it anymore. This is probably due to the changes with formatting of

Removal of ICC (intel compiler) bits from mk

2011-04-18 Thread Dimitry Andric
Reviving an old thread(*), I would like to propose to finally remove the Intel C Compiler support from share/mk and other places. As mentioned in that thread, the ICC bits simply do not work anymore, and no one has volunteered to fix it for many years. Please review the attached patch, which

Re: Removal of ICC (intel compiler) bits from mk

2011-04-18 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:42:49 +0200 Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote: Reviving an old thread(*), I would like to propose to finally remove the Intel C Compiler support from share/mk and other places. As mentioned in that thread, the ICC bits simply do not work anymore, and no one has

Re: HEADS UP: Removal of libobjc from the base system

2011-04-18 Thread Pedro F. Giffuni
--- On Mon, 4/18/11, Scott Long sco...@samsco.org wrote: ... Yeah it's too outdated to be of any use. IMHO, you can axe libf2c too... Honest question here, is there a newer version of libf2c that lives in ports and is adopted by people who use fortran?  The one that I find in the

Re: `hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature' disappeared

2011-04-18 Thread mdf
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 5:05 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote: On Saturday, April 16, 2011 11:51:22 am Nick Ulen wrote: FreeBSD was successfully upgraded. uname -v FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0: Mon Apr 11 18:14:36 MSD 2011 root@test:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Everything seems to be

Re: HEADS UP: Removal of libobjc from the base system

2011-04-18 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 06:37:10 -0700 (PDT) Pedro F. Giffuni giffu...@tutopia.com wrote: --- On Mon, 4/18/11, Scott Long sco...@samsco.org wrote: ... Yeah it's too outdated to be of any use. IMHO, you can axe libf2c too... Honest question here, is there a newer version of

Re: `hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature' disappeared

2011-04-18 Thread mdf
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 5:05 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote: On Saturday, April 16, 2011 11:51:22 am Nick Ulen wrote: FreeBSD was successfully upgraded. uname -v FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0: Mon Apr 11 18:14:36 MSD 2011 root@test:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Everything seems to be

Re: HEADS UP: Removal of libobjc from the base system

2011-04-18 Thread Scott Long
On Apr 18, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Alexander Kabaev wrote: On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 06:37:10 -0700 (PDT) Pedro F. Giffuni giffu...@tutopia.com wrote: --- On Mon, 4/18/11, Scott Long sco...@samsco.org wrote: ... Yeah it's too outdated to be of any use. IMHO, you can axe libf2c too... Honest

Re: `hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature' disappeared

2011-04-18 Thread David Wolfskill
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 08:43:56AM -0700, m...@freebsd.org wrote: I don't seem to have a hw.acpi.thermal sysctl node on my box. Can someone please try this patch? Well, no magic smoke leaked out when I tried it, and: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #203 r220770M: Mon Apr 18 09:51:15 PDT 2011

Re: Removal of ICC (intel compiler) bits from mk

2011-04-18 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2011-04-18 16:34, Alexander Kabaev wrote: ... Please review the attached patch, which cleans up the ICC bits. You probably also want to remove the code that uses __INTEL_COMPILER in source tree if you want to be really thorough. Ok, new patch attached. Some of the contributed sources

RFC: let man(1) depend on users PATH?

2011-04-18 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
Greetings, the following patch is required to let man(1) continue to work if the user build WITHOUT_GROFF and has textproc/groff installed. I personally think relying on a sane $PATH while calling groff and co is ok to do. If there are good reasons against this, please speak your mind. The idea

Re: HEADS UP: Removal of libobjc from the base system

2011-04-18 Thread Pedro F. Giffuni
--- On Mon, 4/18/11, Scott Long sco...@samsco.org wrote: ... We do not have f2c in tree and it was disconnected from the build even longer than that. Guess I was looking on an old system, sorry for the noise. Scott Ugh.. pointyhat is all mine please... It's still linked in