On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Nathan Whitehorn
nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 10/14/11 14:10, Jayachandran C. wrote:
I'm planning commit this -CURRENT if there an no objections.
In the current implementation, phandle is used to store a pointer to
the location inside the device tree.
Am Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:55:28 +0400
schrieb Pavel Timofeev tim...@gmail.com:
That's what most people think.
Hi!
I'm not thinking this. This is made up by users who only adapt slowly
to changes and features. Look at the whole crowd which got furious about
the new Microsoft Office. I tell you, in
MHO different OS releases (Unix or not) are usually at the state of
FreeBSD current regarding stability. FreeBSD late BETA and early RC
are usually very stable. Therefore the approximate one month period
between the first beta and the release is adequate time.
I see your point, especially
On 10/13/11, Oliver Hartman wrote:
On 10/13/11 10:39, Johan Hendriks wrote:
Hello all.
I just used the 9.0 B3 installer, and it defaults to GPT, which is nice.
However, and there has been some discussions about it, it would be nice
if the installer warns me that i could get in trouble
Since today's morning I receive on every box this message shown below
while doing a 'portsnap fetch'.
What's wrong and how to repair?
Regards,
Oliver
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found.
Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap1.FreeBSD.org... done.
Fetching snapshot
On 10/15/11 01:12, Jayachandran C. wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Nathan Whitehorn
nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 10/14/11 14:10, Jayachandran C. wrote:
I'm planning commit this -CURRENT if there an no objections.
In the current implementation, phandle is used to store a pointer
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Nathan Whitehorn
nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 10/15/11 01:12, Jayachandran C. wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Nathan Whitehorn
nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 10/14/11 14:10, Jayachandran C. wrote:
I'm planning commit this -CURRENT if there an
On Oct 15, 2011, at 9:33 AM, Jayachandran C. wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Nathan Whitehorn
nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 10/15/11 01:12, Jayachandran C. wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Nathan Whitehorn
nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 10/14/11 14:10, Jayachandran
On 2011-10-15, at 18:48, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Oct 15, 2011, at 9:33 AM, Jayachandran C. wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Nathan Whitehorn
nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 10/15/11 01:12, Jayachandran C. wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Nathan Whitehorn
Currently I have a strange situation when I have running system on my zroot
but I can't import this pool when booted from memstick. I was trying to
understand what is going on and here are my observations. My partition table
is:
gpart show -l
= 34 250069613 ada0 GPT (119G)
34
Could owners of nge(4), tl(4), wb(4) and rl(4) driven hardware (as for
rl(4) only 8129 need testing, 8139 don't) please give the following
patch a try in order to ensure it doesn't break anything?
for 9/head:
http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/mii_bitbang.diff
for 8:
Dear all,
I would like to remind you that the next round of status reports
covering the third quarter of 2011 were due on October 15th, 2011. As
this initiative is very popular among our users, I would like to
ask you to submit your status reports as soon as possible, so that we
can compile
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 02:46:23AM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 15 Oct 2011, at 22:56, Marius Strobl mar...@alchemy.franken.de wrote:
Could owners of nge(4), tl(4), wb(4) and rl(4) driven hardware (as for
rl(4) only 8129 need testing, 8139 don't) please give the following
patch
13 matches
Mail list logo
