On 20/08/2012 21:43, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi all,
Since 1.0-rc6 release, everything looks ready for a final release of 1.0, I'll
give more details on the release commit bit :) this is planned for 30th august
2012.
Congratulations, it's great! :)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
on 21/08/2012 04:59 Scott Long said the following:
This gets brought up from time to time, and I honestly thought that I swept
most of the problems up a few years ago. The mistake that I made in the mlx
driver that was recently corrected was evidence of a previous sweep.
If anyone wants to
Hi all,
After last update my home machine begin doin some strange things -
Aug 21 08:28:25 home kernel: fxp0: link state changed to UP
Aug 21 08:28:25 home kernel: fxp0: link state changed to DOWN
Aug 21 08:28:27 home kernel: fxp0: link state changed to UP
Aug 21 08:28:33 home dhclient: New IP
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Vitalij Satanivskij sa...@ukr.net wrote:
Hi all,
After last update my home machine begin doin some strange things -
...
Try reverting r239356 -- if that works, then please let jhb@ know.
-Garrett
___
Hello, Garrett.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 15:18:05:
GC Try reverting r239356 -- if that works, then please let jhb@ know.
I'm confused by this commit, because it seems (from comment alone),
that dhclient will not work without devd anymore (with synchronous
dhcp option in rc.conf).
Am I
Hello, Lev.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 15:40:35:
GC Try reverting r239356 -- if that works, then please let jhb@ know.
LS I'm confused by this commit, because it seems (from comment alone),
LS that dhclient will not work without devd anymore (with synchronous
LS dhcp option in rc.conf).
Hello, Garrett.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 15:40:35:
GC Try reverting r239356 -- if that works, then please let jhb@ know.
LS I'm confused by this commit, because it seems (from comment alone),
LS that dhclient will not work without devd anymore (with synchronous
LS dhcp option in
Today I ran into a problem with FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r239477
recompiling the VBox kernel module:
=== Cleaning for virtualbox-ose-kmod-4.1.18_1
=== virtualbox-ose-kmod-4.1.18_1 is marked as broken: Does not compile
on FreeBSD 8.2.
*** [all] Error code 1
Stop in
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 22:24:56 +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote:
Hello,
If you are not using geli(4) on -CURRENT (AKA FreeBSD 10) you can safely
ignore this mail. If you are, please read on!
-CURRENT users of geli(4) should be advised that, a geli(4) device may
have weak master key, if
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 03:45:48PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Lev.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 15:40:35:
GC Try reverting r239356 -- if that works, then please let jhb@ know.
LS I'm confused by this commit, because it seems (from comment alone),
LS that dhclient will not
Hi Baptise,
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:43:13PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Since 1.0-rc6 release, everything looks ready for a final release of 1.0, I'll
give more details on the release commit bit :) this is planned for 30th august
2012.
Current was supposed to switch to pkgng by
On Mon, August 20, 2012 17:54, Randy Bush wrote:
-O allowed it to buildworld!
Should be marginally faster compiling too .. good to hear :-)
imb
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 03:26:43PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi Baptise,
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:43:13PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Since 1.0-rc6 release, everything looks ready for a final release of 1.0,
I'll
give more details on the release commit bit :) this is
On 2012-08-19 16:01, Randy Bush wrote:
...
c++ -O2 -pipe -DIPFIREWALL_NAT -march=pentium
-I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmcore/../../../contrib/llvm/include
-I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmcore/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/include
-I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmcore/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/VMCore
On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 7:53:08 am Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Garrett.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 15:40:35:
GC Try reverting r239356 -- if that works, then please let jhb@ know.
LS I'm confused by this commit, because it seems (from comment alone),
LS that dhclient will not
Hello, John.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 17:34:31:
JB Humm. devd is the more common case, and we explicitly don't use devd to
start
JB dhclient on boot even when devd is enabled (so out of the box dhcp would
first
JB be started by rc, but would be restarted by devd).
It is strange, and,
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 19:04 +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, John.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 17:34:31:
JB Humm. devd is the more common case, and we explicitly don't use devd to
start
JB dhclient on boot even when devd is enabled (so out of the box dhcp would
first
JB be
Hello, Ian.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 19:16:03:
IL It has worked this way for me for years. Does it somehow not work this
IL way for everyone?
Please, read comment to r239356. Starting from this revision
dhclient exists on interface down and _remiove_ IP address from
interface. Removal
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 19:26 +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Ian.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 19:16:03:
IL It has worked this way for me for years. Does it somehow not work this
IL way for everyone?
Please, read comment to r239356. Starting from this revision
dhclient exists on
Garrett Cooper wrote:
GC On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Vitalij Satanivskij sa...@ukr.net wrote:
GC Hi all,
GC
GC After last update my home machine begin doin some strange things -
GC
GC ...
GC
GC Try reverting r239356 -- if that works, then please let jhb@ know.
GC -Garrett
Yes i'm
Hello, Ian.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 19:55:07:
IL I don't know what teardown the configured lease in that comment means,
IL but it doesn't mean that the interface loses its current configuration,
IL or that any existing connections are perturbed.
Sorry, but comment in PR:
On 2012-08-21 13:45, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Lev.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 15:40:35:
GC Try reverting r239356 -- if that works, then please let jhb@ know.
LS I'm confused by this commit, because it seems (from comment alone),
LS that dhclient will not work without devd
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 21:01 +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
IL The important point is that if you unplug the cable then plug it into a
IL different network, now the right thing will happen -- you will acquire
IL an address on the new network. That's the reason that this change is an
IL
Hello, Ian.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 21:36:30:
IL Perhaps the right solution is to add a dhclient command line option to
IL operate in the historical buggy mode: it doesn't exit on link status
IL changes, and fails to work properly if those link status changes are
IL happening because the
Hello, Ian.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 21:36:30:
IL I think it's funny how people have this knee-jerk reaction against C++
IL apps. The devd executable is not exactly an example of bloatware: 374k
IL statically linked (so it already includes this C++ runtime that you
IL think is large).We
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:40:27PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Ian.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 21:36:30:
IL Perhaps the right solution is to add a dhclient command line option to
IL operate in the historical buggy mode: it doesn't exit on link status
IL changes, and fails to
On 8/21/2012 6:34 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
Humm. devd is the more common case, and we explicitly don't use devd to
start
dhclient on boot even when devd is enabled (so out of the box dhcp would
first
be started by rc, but would be restarted by devd).
That sounds reasonable. People who
On 8/21/2012 6:46 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
I would also like to just remove pkg_* tools from RELENG_10 if that fits the
schedule.
Um, no?
Until pkg becomes mandatory (which can't happen for several years) the
pkg_* tools can't be removed altogether.
What _would_ be useful is what should
Hello, Slawa.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 21:47:46:
SO Not re-request lease, simple renew.
Sorry, I'm not very strong in exact terms here.
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:17:36AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
On 8/21/2012 6:46 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
I would also like to just remove pkg_* tools from RELENG_10 if that fits the
schedule.
Um, no?
Until pkg becomes mandatory (which can't happen for several years) the
pkg_* tools
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 8/21/2012 6:46 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
I would also like to just remove pkg_* tools from RELENG_10 if that fits the
schedule.
Um, no?
...
What _would_ be useful is what should have been done many years ago when
On 8/21/2012 11:47 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 8/21/2012 6:46 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
I would also like to just remove pkg_* tools from RELENG_10 if that fits the
schedule.
Um, no?
...
What _would_ be useful
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:47:36AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 8/21/2012 6:46 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
I would also like to just remove pkg_* tools from RELENG_10 if that fits
the
schedule.
Um, no?
...
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:18:15PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
SO Not re-request lease, simple renew.
Sorry, I'm not very strong in exact terms here.
dhcp client can sent different requests:
DHCPDISCOVER from 0.0.0.0 to 255.255.255.255
DHCPREQUEST from 0.0.0.0 to SERVER_IP (from
On 8/21/2012 12:05 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
1/ if it fits the schedule: get rid of pkg_* tools in current to be
able to have a fully pkgng only 10-RELEASE
I think it would fit better with historic precedents to make pkg
optional (but default on) in 10, and mandatory in 11. As stated
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:38:04PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
On 8/21/2012 12:05 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
1/ if it fits the schedule: get rid of pkg_* tools in current to be
able to have a fully pkgng only 10-RELEASE
I think it would fit better with historic precedents to make pkg
On 8/21/2012 12:42 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:38:04PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
On 8/21/2012 12:05 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
1/ if it fits the schedule: get rid of pkg_* tools in current
to be able to have a fully pkgng only 10-RELEASE
I think it would fit
On Aug 21, 2012, at 6:46 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 03:45:48PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Lev.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 15:40:35:
GC Try reverting r239356 -- if that works, then please let jhb@ know.
LS I'm confused by this commit, because it
On Aug 21, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 21:01 +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
IL The important point is that if you unplug the cable then plug it into a
IL different network, now the right thing will happen -- you will acquire
IL an address on the new network.
On Aug 21, 2012, at 11:42 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Ian.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 21:36:30:
IL I think it's funny how people have this knee-jerk reaction against C++
IL apps. The devd executable is not exactly an example of bloatware: 374k
IL statically linked (so it already
On Aug 21, 2012, at 1:51 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 8/21/2012 12:42 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:38:04PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
On 8/21/2012 12:05 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
1/ if it fits the schedule: get rid of pkg_* tools in current
to be able to have a
On 8/21/2012 1:08 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
On Aug 21, 2012, at 1:51 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 8/21/2012 12:42 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:38:04PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
On 8/21/2012 12:05 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
1/ if it fits the schedule: get rid of
Hello, Warner.
You wrote 22 августа 2012 г., 0:02:18:
WL Haven't looked at the dhclient issues surrounding this tread, but
WL C++ size and bloat of devd is an argument not supported by the objective
facts.
Ok, lets leave C++ alone, but intended address removal (See PR
comments) is POLA
Hello, Warner.
You wrote 22 августа 2012 г., 0:04:41:
BTW, typical MIPS SoC-based router has only 16MiB of flash. And,
yes, FreeBSD doesn't fit well in this size now, but why add another
mandatory program, only role of which is to monitor network cable and
re-run the same program every
Hello, Warner.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 23:56:11:
WL mosh helps.
And what helps in case of on-line backup? Not every network protocol
and protocol implementation, unfortunately, supports automatic
resume :(
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org
On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 9:34:31 am John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 7:53:08 am Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Garrett.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 15:40:35:
GC Try reverting r239356 -- if that works, then please let jhb@ know.
LS I'm confused by this commit,
On 20.08.12 10:32, Doug Barton wrote:
On 08/15/2012 03:18, Alexander Motin wrote:
It is quite pointless to speculate without real info like mentioned
above KTR_SCHED traces.
I'm sorry, you're quite wrong about that. In the cases I mentioned, and
in about 2 out of 3 of the cases where users
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 14:04 -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
On Aug 21, 2012, at 11:42 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Ian.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 21:36:30:
IL I think it's funny how people have this knee-jerk reaction against C++
IL apps. The devd executable is not exactly an
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 8/21/2012 1:08 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
On Aug 21, 2012, at 1:51 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 8/21/2012 12:42 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:38:04PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
On 8/21/2012 12:05 PM,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 01:56:11PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
On Aug 21, 2012, at 6:46 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 03:45:48PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Lev.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 15:40:35:
GC Try reverting r239356 -- if that works,
On 2012-Aug-21 19:42:17 +0300, Vitalij Satanivskij sa...@ukr.net wrote:
Look's like dhclient do down/up sequence -
Not intentionally.
Aug 21 19:21:00 home kernel: fxp0: link state changed to UP
Aug 21 19:21:01 home kernel: fxp0: link state changed to DOWN
Aug 21 19:21:01 home dhclient: New IP
Hello, Ian.
You wrote 22 августа 2012 г., 1:38:04:
IL For example, this script can replace devd as a daemon that restarts
IL dhclient when any link comes back up...
IL Of course the right thing to do is invoke the proper rc scripts rather
IL than dhclient directly... this is just to illustrate
Hello, John.
You wrote 22 августа 2012 г., 1:25:23:
JB Ok, this is what I came up with, somewhat loosely based on OpenBSD's
dhclient.
JB I tested that it survives the following:
JB - Unplugging/replugging does not kill an existing ssh session
JB - Using ifconfig down/up does not kill an
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 02:36:23AM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Ian.
You wrote 22 августа 2012 г., 1:38:04:
IL For example, this script can replace devd as a daemon that restarts
IL dhclient when any link comes back up...
IL Of course the right thing to do is invoke the proper rc
On 2012-Aug-21 17:25:23 -0400, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
Ok, this is what I came up with, somewhat loosely based on OpenBSD's dhclient.
I tested that it survives the following:
I've also done some limited testing on both bge and fxp NICs and
haven't run into any problems. In
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 05:25:23PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 9:34:31 am John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 7:53:08 am Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Garrett.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 15:40:35:
GC Try reverting r239356 -- if that works,
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 08:27:01AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2012-Aug-21 19:42:17 +0300, Vitalij Satanivskij sa...@ukr.net wrote:
Look's like dhclient do down/up sequence -
Not intentionally.
Aug 21 19:21:00 home kernel: fxp0: link state changed to UP
Aug 21 19:21:01 home kernel:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Doug Barton wrote:
I don't think we have ever done a complete replacement of major
infrastructure in one release.
You mean like sysinstall can be used as an installer on 9 that would
do something meaningful with the current infrastructure we provide?
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Aug 21, 2012, at 4:15 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 01:56:11PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
On Aug 21, 2012, at 6:46 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 03:45:48PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Lev.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г.,
On Aug 21, 2012, at 5:00 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 02:36:23AM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Ian.
You wrote 22 августа 2012 г., 1:38:04:
IL For example, this script can replace devd as a daemon that restarts
IL dhclient when any link comes back up...
60 matches
Mail list logo
