On Friday 26 October 2012 00:40:42 Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Nikolai Lifanov
lifa...@mail.lifanov.com wrote:
...
HEAD, sorry
No worries. Nothing coming to mind in the svn commits immediately, so
it might be a complex interaction issue. I would see if you
TB --- 2012-10-26 05:31:42 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-26 05:31:42 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
Since a couple of weeks I occasionally notice that a command accessing
cd0 hangs and once that happens I haven't found a way to get cd0
working again through software without rebooting.
No kernel complaints are logged, but afterwards somewhat related
commands hang as well.
In this case I noticed
On 10/26/2012 02:43 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Friday 26 October 2012 00:40:42 Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Nikolai Lifanov
lifa...@mail.lifanov.com wrote:
...
HEAD, sorry
No worries. Nothing coming to mind in the svn commits immediately, so
it might be a
TB --- 2012-10-26 15:12:31 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-26 15:12:31 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
Running make tinderbox locally I see failures that aren't being
reported by the automated tinderbox builds. I'm curious what's
different about the environment. Failures are in the following:
arm ARMADAXP kernel failed, check _.arm.ARMADAXP for details
mips SENTRY5 kernel failed, check
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:26 AM, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Running make tinderbox locally I see failures that aren't being
reported by the automated tinderbox builds. I'm curious what's
different about the environment. Failures are in the following:
arm ARMADAXP kernel failed, check
On Oct 26, 2012, at 1:08 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:26 AM, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Running make tinderbox locally I see failures that aren't being
reported by the automated tinderbox builds. I'm curious what's
different about the environment. Failures are in the
TB --- 2012-10-26 19:36:07 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-26 19:36:07 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
On Oct 26, 2012, at 1:08 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:26 AM, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Running make tinderbox locally I see failures that aren't being
reported by the automated tinderbox builds. I'm curious what's
different about the environment. Failures are in the
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
On Oct 26, 2012, at 1:08 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:26 AM, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Running make tinderbox locally I see failures that aren't being
reported by the automated tinderbox builds. I'm
TB --- 2012-10-26 22:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-26 22:20:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2012-10-27 00:42:16 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-10-27 00:42:16 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
13 matches
Mail list logo
